COOPERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT

Keywords: : public administration, civil society, cooperation, cooperative, public institution.

Abstract

The trend of growth in the modern world of scale and number of problems and contradictions of a social nature, unfortunately, takes place in Ukraine in particular. Therefore, it is time to find adequate ways for the state to overcome a number of socio-economic problems. At the same time, with the further spread of the idea of public administration and the efforts of our state to move to a qualitatively new level of public administration through reforms, which, admittedly, are not always systemic, more and more attention is drawn to such a participant in public administration as civil society. It is in this context that the author proposes to look at such a rather new phenomenon as cooperation and its formalized manifestation - cooperative. To this end, the author presents the positions of the pioneers of cooperative thought and analyzes some existing approaches of modern scientists to the definition of such concepts as “cooperation” and “cooperative”, which shows that cooperation, first and foremost, scientists understand as a process of cooperation. Also common is the scientific position that a cooperative is considered a collection of cooperatives and their associations. However, there is a clear lack of unity among scholars in their views on the essence and content of such a concept as “cooperation”, and hence the concept of “cooperative”. The author emphasizes that cooperation has great potential in terms of its participation in the process of public administration, because as a component of civil society it can formulate certain collective interests, articulate pressing problems of society and participate in the process of public policy and its subsequent process implementation, while assuming part of the burden of implementing decisions. Along with this, cooperation is able to give some feedback to the state, a real assessment of the results of the latter, and this is no less important.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amosov, O., Havkalova, N. (2015). Kontseptualni zasady publichnoho upravlinnia: arkhetypnyi pidkhid. Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka, 1, 8–12. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pubupr_2015_1%28spets.__4 [in Ukrainian].

Volyk, A.M. (2000). Rozvytok silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii v krainakh Zakhidnoi Yevropy (rezultaty ta mozhlyvosti zastosuvannia v ahropromyslovomu vyrobnytstvi Ukrainy). Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Haietska-Kolotylo, Ya.Z. (2003). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi formy silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii v Ukraini. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Gdyshinskij, A. (1914). K voprosu o prirode kooperacii (otvet g. Barybinu). Vestnik kooperacii, 9, 61–64 [in Russian].

Gibner, N.P. (1911). Sistema kooperacii. Moskva [in Russian].

Honcharenko, V.V. (2002). Stanovlennia svitovoi systemy kredytnoi kooperatsii: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Horbonos, F.V., Pavlenchyk, N.F. (2006). Teoretychni aspekty suti kooperatsii iak ekonomichnoho iavyscha v ahrarnij ekonomitsi. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, spets. vyp. (serp.), 21–25 [in Ukrainian].

Surmin, Yu.P., Bakumenko, V.D., Mykhnenko, A.M. and other. (2010). Entsyklopedychnyj slovnyk z derzhavnoho upravlinnia [in Ukrainian].

Zinovchuk, V.V. (2000). Silskohospodarska kooperatsiia: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Levin, E. (1914). Chto takoe kooperaciya (kriticheskij ocherk). Vestnik kooperacii, 6-7, 63–93 [in Russian].

Gorbunov-Posadov, I. (Ed.). (1910). Mirovoj perevorot v ekonomicheskoj zhizni: Kooperaciya v Velikobritanii. Moskva [in Russian].

Minenko, M.A. (2013). Transformatsiia systemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia v suchasni modeli rehuliuvannia suspilstva. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, 6. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Duur_2013_6_3 [in Ukrainian].

Pazhitnov, K. (1915). K voprosu o sushchnosti kooperacii i ee opredelenii. Vestnik kooperacii, 6, 2–23 [in Russian].

Pantelejmonenko, A.O. (2011). Stanovlennia i rozvytok zhytlovoi kooperatsii u

Velykobrytanii. Naukovyj visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 5, 333–341. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvpusk_2011_5_70 [in Ukrainian].

Pekarskij, V. (1914). Chto takoe kooperaciya i kooperativ (otvet E. Levinu). Vestnik kooperacii, 9, 43–61 [in Russian].

Podolskij, I.M. (1914). Novyj trud po teorii i praktike kooperacii. Vestnik kooperacii, 2, 37–49 [in Russian].

Prylipko, S.M. (2019). Publichne upravlinnia rozvytkom obsluhovuiuchoi kooperatsii silskykh terytorij v Ukraini. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Skopnenko, O.I., Tsymbaliuk, T.V. (2006). Suchasnyj slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv: blyzko 20 tys. sliv i slovospoluchen [in Ukrainian].

Tugan-Baranovskij, M.I. (1992). Socialnye osnovy kooperacii. Moskva [in Russian].

Ushkarenko, Yu.V. (2010). Rozvytok silskohospodarskoi kooperatsii (teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka). Doctor’s thesis. Zhytomyr [in Ukrainian].

Published
2021-02-17
How to Cite
Myroshnychenko , A. (2021). COOPERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 1(72), 55-51. https://doi.org/10.34213/tp.21.01.07
Section
The Development of Public Administration System in Ukraine