Peculiarities of subjectivity of public organization in public-management relations of service-oriented state and society
Abstract
The peculiarities of the subjectivity of the NGO in the conditions of the service-oriented state are analyzed. An attempt has been made to unify the judgments of scholars and to offer their own understanding of the phenomenon of the subjectivity of public organization. Emphasis is placed on the components of NGO activity in the context of public-management relations. The author's components of her subjectivity, the characteristic conditions of functioning of the civil society institution in cooperation with the state, etc., are offered. The categorical problem of "subjectivity" is at the epicenter of attention for certain research tasks in many scientific fields and in many ways is substantively similar (for example, philosophy, psychology, political science, sociology, pedagogy, etc.). We emphasize on it from the point of view of the active manifestation of personal-collective, psychological-group constituents, since the category of "public" focuses the spectrum of the study of all phenomena and processes around the human, social, and social. Therefore, we can design the category also for groups of people, citizens, which, in our case, in particular, are united in social institutions – public organizations. A public organization is not only an object of public-state life, which is influenced by internal and external factors, but also a subject, since its activity affects other objects, subjects, phenomena and processes. In doing so, it, by exercising self-regulation, influences both its activity (autonomously) and the actions of other entities (in cooperation), in particular and through the mentioned components of activity.
Concluding to the problem under study, let us emphasize on our understanding of the entity's definition of subjectivity. We regard it as a conscious, purposeful and responsible social-role activity, which is manifested in the readiness of the institution to perform service-oriented socially useful activities. Subjectivity initiates synergies in the system of public-management relations and gives new target quality to the processes that are carried out.
Downloads
References
Melnychenko, V. (2009). Vdoskonalennia vzaiemodii publichnoi administratsii z hromadianamy jak priorytet administratyvnoi reformy. Reforma publichnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini: vyklyky, stratehii, majbutnie. І.А. Hrytsiak (Ed). Кyiv: К.І.S. 127–142 [in Ukrainian].
Misiura, V. (2015). Servisna sutnist derzhavnoi polityky jak osnova modernizatsii derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Derzhavnoho upravlinnia, issue 12. URL: http://www. dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=933 [in Ukrainian].
Moskalenko, S. (2006). Problema subiektnosti hromadskykh orhanizatsij u sferi sotsialnoi polityky v Ukraini. URL: http://academy.gov.ua/ej/ej11/txts/10msospu.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Osnitskij, А.К. (1996). Problemy issledovaniia subiektivnoj aktivnosti. Voprosy psikhologii, 1, 5–20 [in Russian].
Petrovskij, V.А. (2002). Lichnost v psikhologii: paradigma subiektnosti. Rostov-na-Donu: Fenix [in Russian].
Rubinshtein, S. (2002). Оsnovy obshej psikhologii. SPb: Piter. [in Russian].
Riabets, І.V. (2012). Naukovo-teoretychnyi analiz katehorij “subiektnist” ta “subiektnist maibutnioho fakhivtsa”. Filosofiia ta psykholohiia osvity. 130–136. URL: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/5901/Riabets_Naukovo_teoretychnyi_analiz.pdf?sequence=1
[in Ukrainian].
Salnikov, S.Z. (2016). Rozuminnia subiektnosti v konteksti formuvannia I rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva. URL: http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/16780/1/Sal%CA%B9nikov.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Sokurianskaia, L.G. (2006). Studienchestvo na puti k drugomu obshestvu: tsennostnyj diskurs perekhoda: monografiia. Kharkov [in Russian].
Subiektnist osobystosti v konteksti politychnoji hry. (2010). Zhurnal verkhovnoji Rady Ukrainy “Viche”. URL: http://www.viche.info/journal/1833/ [in Ukrainian].
Troshchynskyj, V. (2007). Humanitarna sytuatsiia v Ukraini kriz pryzmu socialnoho samopochuttia liudyny. Stratehiia reformuvannia systemy gerzhavnoho upravlinnia na zasadakh demokratychnoho vriaduvannia. О.Yu. Оbolenskoho, S. V. Siomina (Ed.). Кyiv: Vyd-vо NАDU. Т. 4.
–174.
Farina, Ya. (2012). Subiekt і subiektnist jak socialni fenomeny: naukovi interpretatsii. Naukovi pratsі: naukovo-metodychnyj zhurnal. Ser.: Sutsiologia. Т. 184, issue 172, 42–46. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Npchdusoc_2012_184_172_10 [in Ukrainian].
Yakobchuk, V.P., Tyshchenko, S.V., Puhachova, N.S. (2018). Innovatsijni pidkhody do publichnoho upravlinnia v konteksti intelektualizatsii suspilstva. Іnvestytsii: praktyka i dosvid. Issue 6.
URL: http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=6003&i=17 [in Ukrainian].
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
