COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF LOGIC IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERITAGE OF ARISTOTLE, L. EULER, P. LODIUS, B. RUSSELL

  • Oleksandra Holovko Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Social and Economic Disciplines, National Research Institute No. 4, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-5944
Keywords: logic, history of logic, Aristotle, L. Euler, P. Lodius, B. Russell, concept, comparative analysis, description

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to carry out a comparative analysis of the content of the concepts of logic, presented in the philosophical heritage of Aristotle as the founder of classical formal logic, Leonard Euler as an outstanding representative of the Enlightenment era, thanks to which the possibility of visualizing logical relationships between concepts appeared, Petro Lodiy, an outstanding Ukrainian philosopher-logician, who systematized the logical knowledge of his time, and Bertrand Russell - mathematician, philosopher, publicist, founder of the modern philosophy of logical analysis. The relevance of the article is due to the need to understand the historical evolution and meaningful content of the key concepts of logic, which is the foundation of rational cognition. Analysis of the heritage of outstanding thinkers who worked in different eras and represented different scientific paradigms allows us to identify both universal and specific features of the development of logical thought. The article uses historical-philosophical, comparative and systemic methods of analysis. The consideration of Aristotle focuses on his «Organon», where logic appears as a theory of proof and a tool for knowing the real. His contribution to the development of syllogistic and the classification of judgments is analyzed. The work of L. Euler is considered through the prism of «Euler's Ring» (diagrams), which became a powerful tool in visualizing the scope of concepts and the relationships between them, which contributed to greater clarity of logical operations, especially in the context of relationships between classes. The legacy of P. Lodia, in particular his "Logical Guidelines", is analyzed as an attempt to systematize and adapt European logical traditions to the needs of academic education in Ukraine at the beginning of the 19th century. B. Russell presented his own philosophical concept, the theory of definite descriptions, which consists in denying the existence of concepts-subjects. He rejects the ontological status of abstract entities and concepts are the result of long-term and thorough descriptions (descriptions) of things, phenomena, and events.

The scientific novelty of the article lies in the identification of common methodological approaches and significant differences in the interpretation of logical concepts. In particular, it is established how the formal, verbally-oriented approach of Aristotle was transformed into a visual-mathematical one in L. Euler, was systematized in a didactic form by P. Lodius and was criticized by B. Russell for a transcendental approach to determining the essence of concepts. The practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of using its results in teaching courses in logic, history of philosophy and methodology of science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bodnarchuk, I. S. (2015). History of Eastern Philosophy in the Studies of B. Russell: Dissertation . Candidate of Philosophical Sciences: 09.00.05. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Bodnarchuk_Liubov/Istoriia_skhidnoi_filosofii_u_doslidzhenniakh_B_Rassela.pdf. (In Ukrainian)

Hnatyuk, Ya. S. (2009). Lectures on the History of Logic: Teaching Aid. Publisher I. Ya. Tretyak. Retrieved from http://194.44.152.155/elib/local/sk/sk751266.pdf. (In Ukrainian)

Denysenko, M. S. (1961). Philosophical Views of P. D. Lodia. Scientific Records of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, VII, 39–43.

Dobrovolsky, V. (2007). Theory Tested for Centuries. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: General Scientific and Public-Political Journal, (8), 57–59. (In Ukrainian)

Kyryk, D. (2000). Life and Activities of P. D. Lodiya. Philosophical Thought, (2), 110–132. (In Ukrainian)

Konversky, A. E. (2024). Traditional Logic: Textbook (3rd ed., revised and supplemented). Center for Educational Literature. Retrieved from https://jurkniga.ua/contents/traditsiyna-logika-pidruchnik.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqw9pO7qH9tTR-gRX54OLeC5HPPNVNgP4_GMsRd3ric90kTnfQG. (In Ukrainian)

Kravchuk, I. (2008). Petro Lodiy as a representative of Ukrainian academic philosophy: diss. ... candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.05. T. G. Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Retrieved from https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0408U004737. (In Ukrainian)

Logic: textbook. (2022). (O. G. Danylyan, Ed.). Pravo. Retrieved from https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/SENMK/pidr_logika_2021.pdf. (In Ukrainian)

Mozgova, N. (2014). The purpose of logic in the theory of knowledge of Petro Lodii. Versus, (2), 24–27. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vers_2014_2_5. (In Ukrainian)

Panafidina, O. P. (2017). Foreword to the publication: Bertrand Russell. The art of philosophizing. Lecture 1. The art of rational assumption. Retrieved from https://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/bitstream/0564/1755/1/%D0%9E%D0%9F%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%84%D1%96%D0%B4%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%281%29.pdf. (In Ukrainian)

Pecheransky, I. (2011). The category of "reason" in the work of Petro Lodiy and Kyiv academic philosophy... East, 4(111), 137–141. Retrieved from https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/33737. (In Ukrainian)

Russell, B. (1995). History of Western Philosophy. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://litopys.org.ua/russel/rus.htm. (In Ukrainian)

Usenko, I. V. (2016). Music I. B. Lodiy: philosopher, jurist, educator. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, (2), 12–19. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Chkup_2016_2_4. (In Ukrainian)

Philosophical thought of Ukraine: names and ideas: teaching-methodical. manual. (2003). (S. M. Vozniak et al.). Play. Retrieved from https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Vozniak_Stepan/Filosofska_dumka_Ukrainy_imena_ta_idei.pdf. (In Ukrainian)

Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. (2002). (V. I. Shynkaruk, Ed.). Abrys. Retrieved from https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Shynkaruk_Volodymyr/Filosofskyi_entsyklopedychnyi_slovnyk.pdf. (In Ukrainian)

Chyzhevsky, D. (1992). Essays on the History of Philosophy in Ukraine.

Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. Retrieved from https://www.uvm.edu/~lderosse/courses/lang/Russell(1905).pdf.

Russell, B. (1963). Principia mathematica. Cambridge at the University press. Retrieved from https://lesharmoniesdelesprit.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/whiteheadrussell-principiamathematicavolumei.pdf.

Russell, B. (1983). Why I am not a christian and the faith of a rationalist. Rationalist press association national secular society. Retrieved from https://racionalistasusp.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/russell001.pdf.

Published
2025-12-30
Cited
How to Cite
Holovko, O. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF LOGIC IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERITAGE OF ARISTOTLE, L. EULER, P. LODIUS, B. RUSSELL . The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (72), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2025-72-08