DIGITAL CITY: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  • Nataiia Popova PhD In Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-1017
  • Mykyta Miazin PhD Student of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4901-8789
Keywords: digital city, smart city, network, anthropocentrism, cognitive city, smart contracts, social practices

Abstract

This article is an attempt to rethink established views on digital cities, offering a new philosophical perspective on their complex nature. The authors propose alternative models for the development of urban space, based on the principles of technodemocracy and inclusivity, and develop innovative approaches to understanding urban space in the digital age. The article provides an analysis of the conceptual metamorphoses of urban discourse in the context of the digital mediatization of the sociocultural landscape. It explores the shift in the semantic fields of the concepts «smart city» and «digital city» through the lens of a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach, which allows for the deconstruction of dominant narratives of technological determinism. The article articulates a conceptual dichotomy between «cities with technologies» and «cities for technologies», which functions as an epistemological matrix for understanding the ambivalence of digital urban space as both a repressive and emancipatory topos. The ontological status of the digital city is examined as a palimpsest of heterogeneous semiotic practices and modes of signification, opposing interpretations of the city as a network of interconnected sensory nodes. The conceptual metaphor of the «labyrinth-network» is critically analyzed, which explicates the dialectical tension between the centripetal architectonics of the panoptic «smart city» and the rhizomatic structure of the «cognitive city». The article also explores the role of artificial intelligence in the transformation of urban space and how this technology can alter our understanding of urban subjectivity. The authors argue for the necessity of further deconstruction of the narratives of technocratic urbanism and the formation of alternative models for the development of urban space, based on the principles of technodemocracy, inclusivity, and epistemic pluralism. The article contributes to the development of theoretical conceptualizations of the digital city, offering an innovative interpretive framework for understanding the dialectical interaction between technological artifacts and social practices in the context of an urban chronotope that is in a state of permanent becoming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Landry, C. (2020). Creative City Making: Its Power and Potential. Folio. P. 252.

Popova, N., Perchyk, A., Myazin, M., & Bednarskyi, S. (2024). Digital Modernity: A Philosophical View on Urbanism and Digital Humanities. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteia, (70), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2024-70-11

Khrabrov, H. (2023). (Cyber)Leisure Spaces. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteia, (69), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2022-69-3

Khrabrova, V. (2024). The Morality of Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics of Truths. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteia, (70), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2024-70-13

Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2021, 28 червня). As AI spreads, experts predict the best and worst changes in digital life by 2035. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/06/28/as-ai-spreads-experts-predict-the-best-and-worst-changes-in-digital-life-by-2035/

Bratton, B. H. (2015). The stack: On software and sovereignty. MIT Press.

Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press.

Fraser, B. (2015). Digital cities: The interdisciplinary future of the urban geo-humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.

Georgiou, M. (2022). Being human in digital cities. Routledge.

Gordon, E., & de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Wiley-Blackwell.

Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Verso.

Harvey, D. (1997). Contested cities: Social process and spatial form. В N. Jewson & S. MacGregor (Ред.), Transforming cities: Urban processes and structure (с. 19-41). Routledge.

Iveson, K. (2011). Mobile media and the strategies of urban citizenship: Discipline, responsibilisation, politicisation. В M. Foth, L. Forlano, C. Satchell, & M. Gibbs (Ред.), From social butterfly to engaged citizen: Urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement (с. 55-70). MIT Press.

Killmister, S. (2023). A metaphysics of dehumanization. Philosophers' Imprint, 23, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.2299

Kitchin, R. (2016). Reframing, reimagining and remaking smart cities. SocArXiv. https://osf.io/cyjhg/

Komninos, N. (2020). Smart cities and connected intelligence: Platforms, ecosystems and network effects. Routledge.

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic.

McQuire, S. (2008). The media city: Media, architecture and urban space. Sage.

McQuire, S. (2016). Geomedia: Networked cities and the future of public space. Polity.

Miazin, M. (2024). Python and the point rush in DeFi. Gearheart.io. https://gearheart.io/blog/python-and-the-point-rush-in-defi/

Mumford, L. (1937). What is a city? Architectural Record, 82(4), 59-62.

Overall, C. (2022). The role of care. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 38-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2022.2063361

Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.

Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2016). The city of tomorrow: Sensors, networks, hackers, and the future of urban life. Yale University Press.

Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.

Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (2006). Revolutionary wealth. Knopf.

Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W. W. Norton & Company.

Wirsbinna, A., Grega, L., & Juenger, M. (2023). Assessing factors influencing citizens' behavioral intention towards smart city living. Smart Cities, 6(6), 3093-3111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6060156

Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/217913

Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Blackwell. 431-438 pp.

Published
2024-12-30
Cited
How to Cite
Popova, N., & Miazin, M. (2024). DIGITAL CITY: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (70), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2024-70-04