THE NEW LOGIC OF CULTURE IN METAMODERNIST AESTHETICS
Abstract
The aim of this study is to identify the characteristics of metamodernism as a new cultural paradigm. For this purpose, a comparison of the specifics of the cultural break of the early 20th and 21st centuries will be used. The attitude of these eras to aesthetics as a new force of persuasion, a manifestation of “soft power”, was chosen as the main criterion for comparison. This, in turn, allows us to assess the new role of culture and art in modern processes of social construction. Special attention is paid to understanding how metamodernism not only structures artistic production, but also forms a new anthropology of the subject living in a state of interdimensional oscillation. This approach allows us to consider metamodernism not simply as another aesthetic trend, but as a symptom of deeper shifts in collective sensuality and cultural imagination.
The cultures of modernism and metamodernism reflect fundamental changes in economic and social life. They give rise to those artistic forms that explain these general transformations. Object-centrism, networkedness, visuality are concepts that provide the theoretical basis of modern culture. The resurgence of modernism is reflected in the idea of the art openness. Modern art is filled with experiments with colors, shapes, textures, attempts at their new theoretical explanation in the form of concepts of various "turns of culture". Culture has emerged as a special sphere of constructing the emotional and psychological experience of reality. The collage, quotation, hypertextuality of the culture of modernism and postmodernism are realized in the atmosphere of new sincerity, meta-irony, new sensuality, which came along with the paradigm of metamodernism. The focus is on the relationship between environmental qualities and human states, which provokes a feeling of nostalgia as a sign of a new cultural paradigm. The structure of sensibility captures the moment of birth of a mental image that has not yet grown into a discourse.
Metamodern aesthetics is a new theory of perception and practice of aesthetic work. It is realized in the structure of "nostalgia", not as a reproduction, but as a reconstruction of human experience. This occurs through the construction of the authenticity of space and human identity, as associations with certain experiences, practices, preferences.
Thus, metamodernism uses the cultural archive of modernism and adapts it to contemporary aesthetics, which actively interacts with current social and cultural practices. Attention is focused on the fixation of emotional impact. Both the ontology and the meaning of works of art have changed, which forms the methodological task of art criticism not to describe, but to explain the works of contemporary authors.
Downloads
References
Artemenko, A.P. (2022). Multiculturalism as an Element of Postmodern Social Practice. Ideology and Politics. (Re)Inventing Multiculturalism in Ukraine: Models, Practices, and Discourses, No. 2(21), pp. 8–18. (in Ukrainian).
Artemenko, A.P. (2023). Aesthetics as the Realization of "Soft Power": The Exploitation of Perceptual Capacity. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. Philosophical Sciences: Academic Journal. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Publishing House, Issue 1 (93), pp. 109–123. (in Ukrainian).
Florida, R. (2018). Homo Creativus: How the New Class is Conquering the World. Kyiv: Nash Format. 380 p> (in Ukrainian).
Böhme G. (1993) Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics. Thesis Eleven; 36; 113 https://web.archive.org/web/20180329014449/http://desteceres.com/boehme.pdf
Benjamin, W. (2005) The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Transcribed: by Andy Blunden. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm
Bourdieu, P. (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Polity Press. 168.
Childish B., Thomson Ch. (2015) Remodernism. // Supplanting the Postmodern. An Anthology of Writings on the Arts and Culture of the Early 21st Century / Rudrum D., Stavris N. (eds.). New York – London – New Delhi – Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic. https://dokumen.pub/supplanting-the-postmodern-an-anthology-of-writings-on-the-arts-and-culture-of-the-early-21st-century-9781501306877-9781501306860-9781501306907-9781501306891.html
Castells, M. (1998) End of Millennium, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. III. Cambridge, Massachusetts; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Dempsey B.G. (2023) Metamodernism: Or, The Cultural Logic of Cultural Logics Paperback . ARC Press. 226 р.
Drayton T. (2024) Metamodernism in Contemporary British Theatre: A Politics of Hope/lessness. - Methuen Drama. 224 p.
Hanzi Freinacht. (2017) The Listening Society. A Metamodern Guide to Politics. Book One. Metamoderna ApS
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Standing, G. (2011) The Precariat. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.hse.ru/data/2013/01/28/1304836059/Standing.%20The_Precariat__The_New_Dangerous_Class__-Bloomsbury_USA%282011%29.pdf
Schumacher, P. (2008) Parametricism as Style - Parametricist Manifesto London https://rasmusbroennum.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/schumacher__patrik_-_parametricist_manifesto-2008.pdf
Storm J., А., J. (2021) Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. The University of Chicago Press, 275 р.
Turner, L. (2015) Metamodernism: A Brief Introduction. Berfrois, 10, https://web.archive.org/web/20171102170029/http://www.berfrois.com/2015/01/everything-always-wanted-know-metamodernism/
Turner, L. (2011) Metamodernist // Manifesto https://web.archive.org/web/20170628051328/http://www.metamodernism.org/
Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. (2010) Notes on metamodernism Journal of Aesthetics & Culture Volume 2. - Issue 1. Article: 5677 | Published online: 25 Jan 2017 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677#d1e400