PHENOMENOLOGICAL-EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF SUBJECTIVATION

  • Olga Dolska Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Professor of Department of Philosophy, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-8282
  • Fu Hоng Head of Education Department Joint Sino-Ukrainian Platform for Innovative Cooperation, Heilongjiang Huayue Oriental Culture Communication Co., Ltd., High-Technology Industrial Development Zone, scientific and technological innovation and entrepreneurship Innovation. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-7226
Keywords: subjectivation, phenomenology, epistemology, body, bodily rationality, intellectual sensuality

Abstract

Recent research has made it possible to trace the nature of the formation of subjectivation. The term, which came from the philosophy of M. Foucault, was considered in the context of historical nature of the subject, peculiarities of its social design. But recently, understanding of such complex terminology is becoming increasingly possible if we turn to modern research in cognition, biology, epistemology. The starting point for this is the activity approach. It opens the way to understanding formation of features and characteristics of the subject. Activity context of the subject's existence makes it possible to understand the nature and conditions of the process of subjectivation, ie its formation.

Modern philosophy is characterized by interdisciplinarity, so we were interested in the work of representatives of phenomenology of body movement and research on the influence of music, creating meaning of music based on ideas of modern epistemology, based on research in psychology, biology, semiotics. Of particular interest are the works that examine body movement and musical sound in the context of the search for biological roots of gesture and sound, which is evidence of a naturalized turn in modern epistemology. This article was inspired by G. Kovtun's modern production of A. Khachaturian's ballet "Spartacus" (which premiered recently at the Kharkiv National Opera and Ballet Theater), because it is in it that one can clearly feel phenomenology as a method, note the infinity of the cognitive role of art and to think about epistemological basis of the relationship between the world around us and our bodily capabilities in the form of a gesture, a sound under the conditions of reproduction of certain meanings by them. Phenomenological-epistemological dimension reveals new horizons of human evolution, because cognition seems to unfold in new contexts, and the performance expands the heuristic spectrum of our environment. One begins to think about the importance of bodily rationality under the effective force of musical sound and bodily gesture.

Based on phenomenological method, by which perceptions are recognized as a special heuristic system, and the conclusions of modern epistemology, which indicate the need to take into account the peculiarities of the body, on the one hand, in complex interaction with the environment, on the other, can focus on design. Possibilities of the subject's life and trace the process of subjectivation from its ontological to epistemological characteristics.

This perspective of understanding the complex process of subjectivation (namely, phenomenological and epistemological dimensions) also allows us to emphasize the differences between those who know and those who observe (as opposed to the study of things and events from only one position). This becomes the basis for understanding the methodological nature of such modern terms as second-order observer and external observer, which allows us to regard subjectivation as a tool or special methodological option in the study of modern scientific thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annett, J. (1996). On knowing how to do things: a theory of motor imagery. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, pp. 65-69.

Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sens du mouvement. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Brentari, C. (2015). Jakob von Uexküll. The Discovery of the Umwelt between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology. Biosemiotics. Part of the Biosemiotics book series. V. 9. Dordrecht: Springer. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9688-0.

Claus, E., Kull, K. (2011). Towards a Semiotic Biology: Life is the Action of Signs. London: Imperial College Press. https://www.academia.edu/727564/Towards_a_Semiotic_Biology_Life_is_the_Action_of_Signs

Decety, J. (1996). Do imagined actions share the same neural substrate? Cognitive Brain Research, №3, pp. 87-93.

Deecke, L. (1996). Planning, preparation, execution, and imagery of volitional action. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, pp. 59-64.

Dolsk,a O., Lobas, V. (2021). Embodied rationality as a mode of the visibility of Ethics (to the question of the toolkit of Constructivism). Filosofiya-Philosophy. V. 30, №2, 2021. P. 126-138.

Dolska, O. (2020). Time to think about bodily Rationality (the stands of the sporting events are empty!), 37-46. URL: https://www.intechopen.com/books/neuroplasticity-insights-of-neural-reorganization/music-and-brain-plasticity-how-sounds-trigger-neurogenerative-adaptations

Iyer, V. (2002). Embodied Mind, Situated Cognition, and Expressive Microtiming in African-American Music. Music Perception, 19, №3, pp. 387-414.

Jeannerod, M. (1994). The Representing Brain: Neural Correlates of Motor Intention and Imagery. Behavioural Brain Sciences, №17, pp.187-202.

Kul, K. (2001). Jakob von Uexküll: A paradigm for biology and semiotics. Semiotica (Special Issue), 134, 1/4.

Lakoff, G., Johnson M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Maturana, H. (1978). “Biology of Language: the Epistemology of Reality”. In: Miller, G. & E. Lenneberg (Eds.). Psychology and biology of Language and Thought. New York: Academic Press, pp. 27-46.

Paillard, J. (1994). La conscience. In: Richelle, M., J.Requin & M.Robert (Eds.). Traité de psychologie expérimentale.2. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 639-684.

Reybrouck, M. (2001). Musical Imagery between Sensory Processing and Ideomotor Simulation. In: Godøy, R.I. & H.Jörgensen (Eds.). Musical Imagery. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 117-136.

Reybrouck, M. (2005). Body, mind and music: musical semantics between experientialcognition and cognitive economy. Trans-Revista. Transcultural de Música, №9. URL: https://www.sibetrans.com/trans/articulo/180/body-mind-and-music-musical-semantics-between-experiential-cognition-and-cognitive-economy

Reybrouck, M., Vuust P., Brattico E. (2017). Music and Brain Plasticity: How Sounds Trigger Neurogenerative Adaptations. Submitted: March 29th 2017 Reviewed: January 23rd 2018Published: June 6th 2018. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74318

Saslaw, J. (1996). Forces, Containers and Paths: The Role of Body-Derived Image Schemas in the Conceptualization of Music. Journal of Music Theory. №40/2, pp. 217-244.

Scheerer, E. (1984). Motor theories of cognitive structure: a historical review. In: Prinz, W. & A.Sanders (Eds.). Cognition and motor processes. Berlin: Springer.

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2008). The Roots of Morality. University Park, PA: State University of Pennsylvania Press.

Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cognitive science and Human Experience. Cambridge (Ma)-London: MIT Press.

Viviani, P. (1990). Moto-perceptual interactions: the evolution of an idea. In: Piatielli Palmarini, M. (Ed.). Cognitive Science in Europe: Issues and Trends. Golem Monograph Series, 1, pp. 11-39.

Uexküll von J.В. (1940/1982). The Theory of Meaning. Semiotica, 42, pp. 25-82.

Uexküll, J.B., Kriszat, G. (1956). Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten. Bedeutungslehre. Mit einem Vorwort von Adolf Portmann. ROWOHLT HAMBURG. URL: https://monoskop.org/images/1/1f/Uexkuell_Jakob_von_Streifzuge_durch_die_Umwelten_von_Tieren_und_Menschen_Ein_Bilderbuch_unsichtbarer_Welten_1956

Gofman I. (2000) Tehniki prezentatsii. Abels H. Interaktsiya, identichnost, prezentatsiya: vvedenie v interpretativnuyu sotsiologiyu. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteyya. (In Russian)

Luhmann, N. (2007) “What ist the case?” and “What is hidden behind it?” – Two sociologies and the theory of society. Russian Sociological Review, 6, 3, 100-116. (In Russian)

Published
2021-05-31
Cited
How to Cite
Dolska, O., & HоngF. (2021). PHENOMENOLOGICAL-EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF SUBJECTIVATION. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (63), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2021-63-06