LITURGICAL ANTIPHONS IN THE UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX TRADITION: PRACTICES AND PERSPECTIVES OF CREATIVITY

  • Andriy М. Tsebenko Candidate of Historical Sciences (PhD), Doctor of Theology (Th.Dr), Senior lecturer of the Department of history, museum studies and cultural heritage Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-0494
Keywords: divine liturgy, liturgical tradition, antiphonal practices

Abstract

The article examines the varieties and modern practices of using liturgical antiphons in the Ukrainian liturgical practice. The specifics of the use of antiphons among all Orthodox Ukrainian denominations are considered. A unifying model of the use of established and newly created liturgical antiphons as one of the segments of liturgical reform needed by the Church is offered. It is stated that the integration of the latest antiphonal texts into the church practice will contribute to enrichment and diversification of the liturgical tradition. Taking into account the newly-formed antiphons among the variety of practices, the author's vision of the application of spiritual and liturgical heritage and Greek liturgical tradition of the new era in modern worship is presented. The author's diversifications of antiphonal practice are singled out to model the relevant section of the future Ukrainian Typicon of St Sophia of Kyiv

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sunday Octoechosc and General menaion (mineia). (2001). Кyiv: Publishing Department of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate. (In Ukrainian).

Igumnov, P. (1983). Antiphons of the Theotokos group of Twelve Great Feasts at the Liturgy (according to the modern Greek Rite). Journal of the Moscow Patriarchate, 6, 64-68. (In Russian).

Liturgicon or Sluzhebnyk. (2005). Kyiv – Kharkiv – Lviv. (In Ukrainian).

Mateos, H., Taft, P. (2009). The development of Byzantine the liturgy. Кyiv: QUO VADIS, 2009. (In Ukrainian).

The Menaion. August, part 2. (2002). Moscow: Publishing Council of the Russian Orthodox Church. (In Russian).

The Festal Menaion, part 1. (2002). Кyiv: Publishing Department of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate. (In Ukrainian).

The Festal Menaion, part 2. (2002). Кyiv: Publishing Department of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate. (In Ukrainian).

Pechatnov, V. (2008). The Divine Liturgy in Russia and in Greece. A Comparative Study of the Contemporary Ordo. Moscow: Palomnik, 2008. (In Russian).

Saint German of Constantinople. (1995). Legend about the Church and consideration of the Sacraments / will enter. article by P.I. Meyendorff, translation and preface. E. M. Lomize. Moscow: Martis. (In Russian).

Wybrew, H. (2000). The Orthodox Liturgy: The Development of the Eucharistic worship in the Byzantine Rite. Moscow: Bible-Theological Institute, 2000. Retrieved from: http://yakov.works/library/20_u/br/u.htm. (In Russian).

Instructions for worship for 2018 for clergymen. (2018). Кyiv: Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Calendar commission. Synodal Information and Educational Department. (In Ukrainian).

Uspensky, N. (2006). Byzantine Liturgy: Historical and Liturgical Research. Anaphora: An Experience of Historical and Liturgical Analysis. Moscow: Publishing Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2006. (In Russian).

Tsebenko, A. (2019). Liturgical antiphons in the Orthodox tradition: the history of formation and practice of application. Orthodox Theological Collection. Pravoslávny teologický zborník, XLV(30). 153-169. (In Ukrainian).

Divine service of the feast of the Baptism of Rus. (1988).Moscow: Publishing Council of the Russian Orthodox Church. (In Russian).

Ustav: The Liturgical Order of Services for the year of the Incarnate Lord 2019. Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA. Retrieved from:: https://uocofusa.org/. (In English).

Published
2021-05-31
Cited
How to Cite
TsebenkoA. М. (2021). LITURGICAL ANTIPHONS IN THE UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX TRADITION: PRACTICES AND PERSPECTIVES OF CREATIVITY. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (63), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2021-63-04