PHENOMENOLOGICAL RECEPTION OF WAR AS A HUMAN EXPERIENCE: THE EXAMPLE OF OCCUPATION
Abstract
The article focuses on the conceptualization of the experience of occupation based on the phenomenological descriptions of life under occupation proposed by Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre. The philosophical potential of the phenomenological methodology is demonstrated by its use in critical war studies, which rethink this phenomenon from the perspective of human experience, rejecting the dominant approach to war as a continuation of politics by other means. Analyzing the research of the representative of critical studies of war, Shane Brighton, the phenomenological potential of the works of Carl von Clausewitz is revealed in the context of rethinking war as the excess of being over knowledge. It is also demonstrated how the understanding of war proposed by E. Levinas is used in interdisciplinary studies of this phenomenon to understand the impact of war on people's lives. At the same time, the author distinguishes between the reference to descriptions of war in works of literature and phenomenological works made by Sh. Brighton to generalize how war is experienced, and phenomenological descriptions of the experience of war itself. The consideration of the essays by M. Merleau-Ponty and J.-P. Sartre helps to demonstrate how the phenomenological methodology is used to describe the direct experience of war, particularly the experience of occupation. The article shows that the phenomenological approach allows not only to rethink war as a generative force, as S. Brighton does, but also to conceptualize specific experiences of war. Thus, using the examples of descriptions of life under occupation offered by M. Merleau-Ponty and J.-P. Sartre, it is shown that the experience of authentic life under occupation can be conceptualized as the experience of struggle in the ranks of the Resistance movement. The conducted research allows us to conclude that it is necessary to use phenomenology to achieve a truly human understanding of war, that is, to understand it as a phenomenon that confronts people with a choice to save their own lives as private individuals and live an illusory freedom or to participate in the Resistance movement and sacrifice their lives in the fight for the freedom of all citizens. The results obtained indicate the need for further phenomenological research of war experiences, which will involve the analysis not only of the experience of occupation, but also other forms of experiencing war.
Downloads
References
Boichenko, M. (2024). The main directions of counteraction to the “Russian world” in Ukraine: the tasks of decolonization. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 29(2), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-2-4 [in Ukrainian].
Yermolenko, A. Resistance instead of Negotiations: Answer of the Ukrainian philosopher Anatoly Yermolenko to Jürgen Habermas. Filosofska dumka 3 (2022): 59–63. https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/617 [In Ukrainian.]
Kebuladze, V. (2024). Concept of ressentiment by Max Scheler and its contemporary relevance. Filosofska Dumka, (2), 105–116. [In Ukrainian.] https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2024.02.105
Prykhodko, V. (2023). THE PHENOMENON OF WAR: MATERIALISTIC PHENOMENOLOGY POINT OF VIEW. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 1(8), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2023/8-6/8 [In Ukrainian.]
Basham, V. M., Belkin, A., & Gifkins, J. (2015). What is Critical Military Studies? Critical Military Studies, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2015.1006879
Brighton, S. (2011). Three Propositions on the Phenomenology of War. International Political Sociology, 5(1), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00122_6.x
Clausewitz, C. v. Howard, M., & Paret, P. (1984). On war. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7svzz
Edkins, J. (Ed.). (2019). Routledge Handbook of Critical International Relations (1st ed.). Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692449
Lévinas, E. (1971). Totalité et infini. M. Nijhoff.
Merleau-Ponty, M., Toadvine, T., & Lawlor, L. (2007). The Merleau-Ponty Reader. Northwestern University Press.
Sartre, J.-P., & Turner, C. (2008). The aftermath of war (Situations III). Seagull Books.
Schmelzle, C. (2019). The legitimacy of occupation authority: beyond just war theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 23(3), 392–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1565721.
Copyright (c) 2025 Олександра Амельченко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


3.gif)



