Analysis of the geological environment of kimberlite pipes in the Slave craton (Canada)

doi:10.26565/2075-1893-2026-43-08

Andrii Luniachek V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9428-6551

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2026-43-08

Keywords: kimberlite pipes, diamonds, Slave Craton, Neoarchean, potassium metasomatism, subduction

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify diamond-bearing criteria through a comparative analysis of the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the Slave Craton with varying diamond content based on characteristics such as the age and type of host rocks and the distance to iron formations.

Main material. The article analyses the geological environment of kimberlite pipes in the Slave Craton with varying levels of diamond content. A qualitative comparison of the main kimberlite fields was carried out, which made it possible to identify the distinctive features of areas with industrial diamond deposits. A database of 196 pipes was created, which made it possible to conduct a quantitative statistical analysis of the relationships between diamond content and geological environment parameters. It was shown that all commercial deposits of the craton (Diavik, Ekati, Snap Lake, Gahcho Kue) are associated exclusively with the Neoarchean basement (2.8–2.5 billion years old), indicating the decisive role of Late Archean tectonic and magmatic events in the formation of conditions favorable for diamond crystallization. A distinct concentration of industrial diamond-bearing pipes has been identified within potassium granitoid fields, which is consistent with the potassium metasomatism model and the concept of «channelled degassing» in the Late Archean. It has been established that kimberlite pipes are absent at a distance of less than 20 km from the surface outcrops of iron formations, while the largest number of industrial pipes are concentrated at a distance of 100–146 km, which is consistent with the subduction model of diamond origin, according to which BIFs mark the upper edge of a steeply subducted oceanic plate, while diamond formation occurred near its lower part.

Conclusions. The results obtained allow us to combine various hypotheses into a single geodynamic model, where the subduction of the oceanic crust at the end of the Neoarchean led to the release of potassium-enriched fluids, potassium metasomatism of the lithospheric mantle, the Earth’s crust, and the formation of diamonds. A comprehensive search criterion for industrial diamond deposits has been formulated, which includes a combination of the following parameters: 1) Neoarchean age of the continental basement, 2) presence of fields of potassium granitoids and potassium metasomatites, 3) location at a distance of ~100–140 km from the outcrops of iron formations on the surface. The application of this approach is important for optimizing diamond exploration and prospecting both within the Slave Craton and in other Precambrian cratons of the world, in particular for identifying potential diamond-bearing areas within the Ukrainian Shield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andrii Luniachek, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD student of the Department of Fundamental and Applied Geology, Senior Researcher at the Nature Museum

References

Luniachek, A. (2025). Review of the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the tectonic structures of the world. GEO&BIO, 27, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2708 [in Ukrainian]

Sorohtin, O. G., & Sorohtin, N. O. (2006). Subduction mechanism of diamond origin. Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean, 1, 5–36. [in Ukrainian]

Armstrong, J. (2003). Diamond discovery in the Slave craton: Compilations of exploration data as tools for future discovery. In Abstracts of the 8th International Kimberlite Conference (pp. 1–5). Victoria. [in English]

Bekker, A., Slack, J., Planavsky, N., Krapez, B., Hofmann, A., Konhauser, K., & Rouxel, O. (2010). Iron formation: The sedimentary product of a complex interplay among mantle, tectonic, oceanic, and biospheric processes. Economic Geology, 105, 467–508. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.105.3.467 [in English]

Carvalho, L. D., Doyle, B., Stachel, T., Stern, R., Steele-MacInnis, M., Nestola, F., & Pearson, D. (2025). The Sequoia kimberlite complex, central Slave Craton: A new superdeep diamond location. Mineralogy and Petrology, 119, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-025-00899-0 [in English]

Davis, W. J., Jones, A. G., Bleeker, W., & Grütter, H. (2003). Lithosphere development in the Slave craton: A linked crustal and mantle perspective. Lithos, 71(2–4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(03)00131-2 [in English]

Faure, S. (2010). World Kimberlites CONSOREM Database (Version 3) [Data set]. Consortium de Recherche en Exploration Minérale CONSOREM, Université du Québec à Montréal. https://consorem2.uqac.ca/production_scientifique/fiches_projets/world_kimberlites_and_lamproites_consorem_database_v2010.xls [in English]

Greene, S., Jacob, D. E., & O’Reilly, S. Y. (2023). Olivine evidence for an ultramafic silicate precursor melt for the Jericho kimberlite (Slave Craton, Canada). Lithos, 438–439, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2022.106996 [in English]

Heaman, L. M., Kjarsgaard, B. A., & Creaser, R. A. (2003). The timing of kimberlite magmatism in North America: Implications for global kimberlite genesis and diamond exploration. Lithos, 71(2–4), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2003.07.005 [in English]

Helmstaedt, H. (2009). Crust–mantle coupling revisited: The Archean Slave craton, NWT, Canada. Lithos, 112, 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.04.046 [in English]

Iizuka, T., Komiya, T., Ueno, Y., Katayama, I., Uehara, Y., Maruyama, S., Hirata, T., Johnson, S., & Dunkley, D. (2007). Geology and zircon geochronology of the Acasta Gneiss Complex, northwestern Canada: New constraints on its tectonothermal history. Precambrian Research, 153, 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.11.017 [in English]

Jones, A., Ferguson, I., Chave, A., Evans, R., & McNeice, G. (2001). Electric lithosphere of the Slave craton. Geology, 29(5), 423–426. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0423:ELOTSC>2.0.CO;2 [in English]

Kaempf, J., Johnson, T. E., Clark, C., Alfing, J., Brown, M., Lanari, P., & Rankenburg, K. (2024). Paleoarchean metamorphism in the Acasta Gneiss Complex: Constraints from phase equilibrium modelling and in situ garnet Lu–Hf geochronology. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 42(3), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12759 [in English]

Kjarsgaard, B., & Levinson, A. (2002). Diamonds in Canada. Gems & Gemology, 38, 208–238. https://doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.38.3.208 [in English]

Kjarsgaard, B., Wit, M., Heaman, L., Pearson, G., Stiefenhofer, J., Januszczak, N., & Shirey, S. (2022). A review of the geology of global diamond mines and deposits. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 88, 1–117. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2022.88.01 [in English]

Konzett, J., Sweeney, R., Thompson, A., & Ulmer, P. (1997). Potassium amphibole stability in the upper mantle: An experimental study in a peralkaline KNCMASH system to 8.5 GPa. Journal of Petrology, 38, 537–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/38.5.537 [in English]

Lobach-Zhuchenko, S., Rollinson, H., Chekulaev, V., Savatenkov, V., Kovalenko, A., Martin, H., Guseva, N., & Arestova, N. (2008). Petrology of a late Archaean, highly potassic sanukitoid pluton from the Baltic Shield: Insights into late Archaean mantle metasomatism. Journal of Petrology, 49, 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egm084 [in English]

Luniachek, A. (2025). Slave Kimberlites Database 2025 v4 [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17157966 [in Ukrainian]

Palyanov, Y. N., Shatsky, V. S., Sobolev, N. V., & Sokol, A. G. (2007). The role of mantle ultrapotassic fluids in diamond formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(22), 9122–9127. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608134104 [in English]

Pell, J. (1997). Kimberlites in the Slave Craton, Northwest Territories, Canada. Geoscience Canada, 24, 77–88. [in English]

Quinn, D., Idzikowski, C., Peters, S., Czaplewski, J., & Kishor, P. (2023). Macrostrat geologic map (Version 4.1.3). https://macrostrat.org/map [in English]

Roots, E., Hill, G., Frieman, B., Smith, R., Craven, J., Snyder, D. B., & Calvert, A. (2025). Channelized metasomatism in Archean cratonic roots as a mechanism of lithospheric refertilization. Nature Communications, 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62912-6 [in English]

Safonov, O. G., Butvina, V., & Limanov, E. (2019). Phlogopite-forming reactions as indicators of metasomatism in the lithospheric mantle. Minerals, 9, 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9110685 [in English]

Shigley, J., Shor, R., Padua, P., Breeding, C., Shirey, S., & Ashbury, D. (2016). Mining diamonds in the Canadian Arctic: The Diavik Mine. Gems & Gemology, 52, 104–131. https://doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.52.2.104 [in English]

Shirey, S., & Shigley, J. (2013). Recent advances in understanding the geology of diamonds. Gems & Gemology, 49, 188–222. https://doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.49.4.188 [in English]

Shirey, S., Cartigny, P., Frost, D., Keshav, S., Nestola, F., Nimis, P., Pearson, G., Sobolev, N., & Walter, M. (2013). Diamonds and the geology of mantle carbon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 75, 355–421. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2013.75.12 [in English]

Smith, E., Shirey, S., Nestola, F., Bullock, E., Wang, J., Richardson, H., & Wang, W. (2016). Large gem diamonds from metallic liquid in Earth’s deep mantle. Science, 354, 1403–1405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1303 [in English]

Stachel, T., Aulbach, S., & Harris, J. (2022). Mineral inclusions in lithospheric diamonds. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 88(1), 307–391. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2022.88.06 [in English]

Stubley, M. P., & Irwin, D. (2019). Bedrock geology of the Slave Craton, Northwest Territories and Nunavut (NWT Open File 2019-01). Northwest Territories Geological Survey. [in English]

Tomlinson, E., Jones, A., & Milledge, J. (2004). High-pressure experimental growth of diamond using C–K₂CO₃–KCl as an analogue for Cl-bearing carbonate fluid. Lithos, 77(1–4), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(04)00147-1 [in English]

Yaxley, G. M., Berry, A. J., Rosenthal, A., Woodland, A., & Paterson, D. (2017). Redox preconditioning deep cratonic lithosphere for kimberlite genesis: Evidence from the central Slave Craton. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00049-3 [in English]