ON THE PROBLEM OF MARTENSITE TETRAGONALITY NATURE

doi:10.26565//2312-4334-2017-3-13

I. N. Laptev National Scientific Center “Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology” 1, Akademicheskaia St., Kharkov, 61108, Ukraine
O. O. Parkhomenko National Scientific Center “Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology” 1, Akademicheskaia St., Kharkov, 61108, Ukraine V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkov, 61022, Ukraine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565//2312-4334-2017-3-13

Keywords: martensite transformation, stress state, tetragonality, vacancies, iron, carbon

Abstract

Despite the fact that scientists have been studying the nature of the mechanism of martensite formation for almost a hundred years, these studies remain, still, relevant. In this paper, the authors present two new results related to the classical question of the role of carbon in martensite formation. If, while dissolving in the lattice, the carbon is located in the center of the octahedral emptiness, then under the influence of stresses caused by quenching or deformation, in martensite it is displaced into one of the pyramids of the constituent octahedra. The fact of the independence of the specific atomic volume of phase mismatch during martensitic transformation of iron from the carbon content was found. This fact indicates that the tetragonality of carbon steels is a function not so much of carbon as vacancies. In the pure iron the "vacancy" tetragonality can vary from 1.03 to 1.06.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

I. N. Laptev, National Scientific Center “Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology” 1, Akademicheskaia St., Kharkov, 61108, Ukraine

References

1. Schteinberg S.S. Relaxation phenomenas in martensite // Journal of technical physics – 1935. – Vol. 5. – No. 2. – P. 362 – 373.

2. Guliaev A.P. Metall Science. – M.: Oborongiz, 1963. – 185p. (In Russian)

3. Oshkaderov S.P. Phase transformation in austenite // Progress in Physics of Metals. – 2011. – Vol.12. – P.269-293. (In Russian)

4. Koval Yu.N., Lobodyuk V.А. Deformation and relaxation phenomenas during martensite transformation. – Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 2010. – 297p. (In Russian)

5. Meshkov Yu.Ya. On the problem on martensite tetragonality. // Proc. Int. Conf. “The modern problems of metal physics and physics of metallic systems” / Ed.IMF NANU, Kiev. – 2527.05. – 2016. – P.22. (In Russian)

6. Kaminsky E.E., Percas M.D. Metal science problems. – М.: Metallurgiya, 1949. – 211p. (In Russian)

7. Arbuzov М.P. Metal physics and science problems. – Kiev: Academy of Sci. Edition. – 1955. – No. 6. – P. 3-11. (In Russian)

8. Kurdyumov G.V., The quenching and aging phenomenas in steel. – М.: Metallurgiya, 1960. – 140 p.

9. Kurdyumov G.V., Utevsky L.M., Entin R.I. Transformations in iron and steel. – М.: Nauka, 1977. – 238p. (In Russian)

10. Kurdyumov G.V., Lysak L.I. X-rays study of aging martensite // Journal of technical physics. – 1947. – Vol. 17. – P.525-531. (In Russian)

11. Lotkov. А.I, Baturin А.А. Martensite transformation in NiTi alloys // Physical mesomechanics. – 2011. – Vol.14. – No. 3. – P. 69-84. (In Russian)

12. Lobodyuk V.А., Meshkov Yu.Ya. On the problem on martensite tetragonality in carbon steel // Metal physics and new technology. – 2017. – Vol.39. – P.122-130. (In Russian)

13. Laptev I.M., Parkhomenko O.O., Tkachenko V.I. The dualism of the vacancy nature in nonequilibrium systems // East European Journal of Physics. – 2016. – No.3. – P.113-120.

14. Morozov О.P., Mirzayev D.A., Schteinberg М.М. The speed quenching impact in iron // Metal physics and Metal science. – 1987. – Vol. 32. – No. 6. – P. 1290 – 1297. (In Russian)

15. Damask А., Dins J. Point defects in metals. – М.: Мir, 1966. – 291p.

16. Rokhmanov N.Ya., Laptev I.N., Onishenko I.P., Parkhomenko O.O. Structural features of Fe-Al vacancy system // Functional Materials. – 2006. – Vol. 13. – No. 2. – P. 255-259.