Analysis of Thermo-Magnetic Casson Hybrid Nanofluid Flow Over a Porous Stretching Sheet Considering Chemical Reaction Using RSM

  • Esara Sivasankar Department of Applied Mathematics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7463-4708
  • M. Sreedhar Babu Department of Applied Mathematics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-6253
  • S. Vijaya Kumar Varma Department of Mathematics, School of Applied Sciences, REVA Research Center, REVA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-9316
Keywords: Casson Hybrid nanofluid, MHD, Porous stretching sheet, Chemical Reaction, Response Surface Method (RSM)

Abstract

Thermophysical analysis of heat and mass transmission has many potential uses in solar collectors, chemical reactors, medicinal devices, and sophisticated cooling systems, among other applications. Owing to this incentive, the present work often employs response surface methodology for heat and mass transfer analysis of a Casson hybrid nanofluid over a permeable stretching sheet with convective and radiative effects. The control system of the PDEs defining the developed model is transformed into a coupled set of nonlinear ODEs by applying appropriate similarity transformations. The shooting method, implemented with MATLAB's BVP4c solver, is used to numerically integrate these simplified equations. Using tabulated data and graphical representations, the effects of relevant physical parameters on the distributions of velocity, temperature, and concentration are systematically examined. Additionally, Response Surface Methodology is used to statistically evaluate key response variables across a broad range of governing parameters, such as the skin-friction coefficient, heat, and mass-transfer rates. The findings show that increasing the Casson parameter reduces the temperature profile because the fluid's effective yield stress decreases. Furthermore, due to increased Lorentz forces, a higher magnetic field considerably reduces fluid velocity. Additionally, it has been observed that an increased solid volume fraction raises the nanofluid's temperature due to enhanced thermal conductivity. The statistical analysis indicates that the mass-transfer accuracy for the derived mathematical model in kerosene is 99.85%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

M. Sreedhar Babu, Department of Applied Mathematics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India

Associate Professor

References

L.J. Crane, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 21, 645 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01587695

N.S. Khashi’ie, N.M. Arifin, R. Nazar, E.H. Hafidzuddin, N. Wahi, and I. Pop, Chin. J. Phys. 64, 251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2019.11.008

M. Shoaib, M.A.Z. Raja, M.T. Sabir, S. Islam, Z. Shah, P. Kumam, and H. Alrabaiah, Sci. Rep. 10, 18533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75254-8

P. Sreedevi, P. Sudarsana Reddy, and A. Chamkha, SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3017-7

I. Waini, A. Ishak, and I. Pop, Appl. Math. Mech. 41, 507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-020-2584-7

M. Santhi, K.V.S. Rao, P.S. Reddy, and P. Sreedevi, Heat Transfer 50, 2929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22047

S. Dinarvand, M. Yousefi, and A. Chamkha, J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 8, 11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2021.37057.2938

I. Haq, M.F. Yassen, M.E. Ghoneim, M. Bilal, A. Ali, and W. Weera, Symmetry 14, 1759 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14091759

S.A.A. Shah, N.A. Ahammad, E.M.T.E. Din, F. Gamaoun, A.U. Awan, and B. Ali, Nanomaterials 12, 2174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132174

S. Elattar, M.M. Helmi, M.A. Elkotb, M.A. El-Shorbagy, A. Abdelrahman, M. Bilal, and A. Ali, Alexandria Eng. J. 61, 10319 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.013

U. Farooq, A. Jan, and M. Hussain, ZAMM, 104, e202300306 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202300306

K. Bhattacharyya, Front. Heat Mass Transf. 4, 023003 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5098/hmt.v4.2.3003

E. H. Aly and I. Pop, Powder Technol. 367, 192 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.026

A. Jamaludin, K. Naganthran, R. Nazar, and I. Pop, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 84, 71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2020.07.003

S. Nandi, B. Kumbhakar, and G. S. Seth, Chin. J. Phys. 77, 2090 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2022.03.004

A. Rashid, M. Ayaz, S. Islam, A. Saeed, P. Kumam, and P. Suttiarporn, S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 42, 255 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2022.07.009

U. Khan, A. Zaib, A. Ishak, N. C. Roy, S. A. Bakar, T. Muhammad, A. H. Abdel-Aty, and I. S. Yahia, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 231, 1195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00482-3

S.E. Ghasemi, S. Mohsenian, S. Gouran, and A. Zolfagharian, Results Phys. 32, 105141 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105141

K. Ali, S. Ahmad, K.S. Nisar, A.A. Faridi, and M. Ashraf, Int. J. Energy Res. 45, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6572

N. A. Zainal, R. Nazar, K. Naganthran, and I. Pop, Neural Comput. Appl. 33, 11285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05613-z

T.S. Neethu, A.S. Sabu, A. Mathew, A. Wakif, and S. Areekara, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 135, 106115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106115

S. Nadeem, R.U. Haq, and N.S. Akbar, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 13, 109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2013.2293735

J. Qing, M.M. Bhatti, M.A. Abbas, M.M. Rashidi, and M.S. Ali, Entropy 18,123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/e18040123

K.A. Khan, A.R. Butt, and N. Raza, Results Phys. 8, 610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.12.024

S.M. Abo-Dahab, M.A. Abdelhafez, F. Mebarek-Oudina, and S.M. Bilal, Indian J. Phys. 95, 2703 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01961-7

N. Hameed, S. Noeiaghdam, W. Khan, B. Pimpunchat, U. Fernandez-Gamiz, M.S. Khan, and A. Rehman, Results Eng. 16, 100601 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100601

R. Meenakumari, P. Lakshminarayana, K. Vajravelu, and G. Sucharitha, Numer. Heat Transf. A, 83, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2023.2175289

R.C.S. Reddy and G. Ramasekhar, East Eur. J. Phys. (4), 286 (2023). https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-4-29

T.N. Tanuja, L. Kavitha, K.U. Rehman, S.V.K. Varma, G.V. Kumar, and Z. Asghar, Int. J. Thermofluids 26, 101089 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.101089

A. Divya, and P.B.A. Reddy, Proc. IMechE Part E, 237, 196 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221143566

S. Manjunatha, J.S. Kumar, K.U. Rehman, W. Shatanawi, and S.V.K. Varma, Int. J. Thermofluids 26, 101130 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.101130

R. Manaswini, B.N. Hanumagowda, T.N. Tanuja, L. Kavitha, A. Abdulrahman, R.J. Punith Gowda, and S.V.K. Varma, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 39(07), 2450420 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984924504207

Published
2026-06-10
Cited
How to Cite
Sivasankar, E., Babu, M. S., & Varma, S. V. K. (2026). Analysis of Thermo-Magnetic Casson Hybrid Nanofluid Flow Over a Porous Stretching Sheet Considering Chemical Reaction Using RSM. East European Journal of Physics, (2), 302-318. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2026-2-32