Dosimetric Evaluation Study of 10-MV FFF Used in SBRT for Lung Tumours
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this research was to conduct a comparative and dosimetric analysis of three different radiotherapy techniques used in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), using a 10 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam. Materials and methods: The present study employed computed tomography (CT) images of a humanoid phantom for the purpose of treatment planning. The gross tumour volumes (GTVs) delineated in both the central and peripheral positions of the lungs. The determination of Planning Target Volumes (PTVs) involved the addition of a margin of 0.5 cm to the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans produced employing a 10-megavolt (MV) flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam. The calculation of dosage for all plans Performed using the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA). Results: IMRT and VMAT had better PTV dose conformation than 3DCRT for both central and peripheral targets. PTV conformity improved in VMAT compared to IMRT, and CI values were acceptable for VMAT, IMRT, and 3DCRT plans. VMAT plans had slightly better CI than IMRT, with better results in peripheral lung PTVs compared to central PTVs. VMAT and IMRT are superior for treating HDV and D2cm, with lower HDV for peripheral lung tumours. Both 3DCRT and IMRT improved outcomes for peripheral lung PTVs, while VMAT was better for central lung PTVs. The former proved better with less low lung doses and improved D2cm results. 3DCRT plans demonstrated higher precision in dose distribution than VMAT and IMRT plans, with superior average GI values. VMAT and IMRT had higher HI, Dmax, and D2% than 3DCRT. VMAT plans compared to IMRT plans, with similar HI values for central lung PTVs. VMAT better spares OARs than other techniques, but V20 and V30 lung doses were lower with 3DCRT. VMAT increases lung dose, but OAR stays below thresholds.
Conclusion: The investigation found that all three treatment techniques can deliver SBRT plans that meet RTOG dose constraints. However, VMAT is a better treatment strategy than IMRT and 3DCRT for both peripheral and central lung PTVs, based on dosimetric indices like CI, D2cm, HI, and HDV. The study found that 3DCRT improves dosimetric indices, especially gradient index (GI), more than VMAT. Despite the need for more monitor units (MUs) in VMAT plans, treatment time reduced due to faster gantry velocity and higher dose rates (2400cGy/min) via free flatting filter energy.
Downloads
References
A. Tajaldeen, P. Ramachandran, S. Alghamdi, and M. Geso, “On the use of AAA and AcurosXB algorithms for three different stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT),” Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 24(4), 399-408 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2019.02.008
K.M. Prezzano, S.J. Ma, G.M. Hermann, C.I. Rivers, J.A. Gomez-Suescun, and A.K. Singh, “Stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A review,” World journal of clinical oncology, 10(1), 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5306%2Fwjco.v10.i1.14
H. Onishi, H. Shirato, Y. Nagata, M. Hiraoka, M. Fujino, K. Gomi, K. Karasawa, et al., “Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for operable stage I non–small-cell lung cancer: can SBRT be comparable to surgery?” International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 81(5) 1352-1358 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1751
M.R. Folkert, and R.D. Timmerman, “Stereotactic ablative body radiosurgery (SABR) or Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT),” Advanced drug delivery reviews, 109, 3-14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.005
S.D. Sharma, “Unflattened photon beams from the standard flattening filter free accelerators for radiotherapy: Advantages, limitations and challenges,” Journal of Medical Physics/Association of Medical Physicists of India 36(3), 123-125 (2011). https://journals.scholarsportal.info/details/09716203/v36i0003/123_upbftsfralac.xml
. Paul, B. Krauss, R. Banckwitz, W. Maentele, R.W. Bauer, and T.J. Vogl, “Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128 slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom,” European journal of radiology, 81(5), e699-e703 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.078
S. Dwivedi, S. Kansal, J. Shukla, A. Bharati, and V.K. Dangwal, “Dosimetric evaluation of different planning techniques based on flattening filter-free beams for central and peripheral lung stereotactic body radiotherapy,” Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, 7(6), 065037 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ac2f0d
H. Mabhouti, M.Sc. thesis, “The comparison of peripheral dose in stereotactic brain irradiation with the use of different treatment techniques,” İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2017.
W. Zia, M.Sc. thesis, “Dosimetric Comparison of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3d-Crt), Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (Vmat) for Distal Esophageal Cancer Treated with External Radiation,” McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, 2022.
G.A. Ezzell, J.M. Galvin, D. Low, J.R. Palta, I. Rosen, M.B. Sharpe, P. Xia, et al., “Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee,” Medical physics, 30(8), 2089-2115 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1591194
S. Webb, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, (CRC Press, 2015).
B.S. Laughlin, M. Golafshar, M. Prince, W. Liu, C.J. Kutyreff, S.K. Ahmed, T.Z. Vern Gross, et al., “Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and 3D conformal therapy for soft tissue extremity sarcoma,” Acta Oncologica, 62(5), 473-479 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2209267
S. Bi, R. Zhu, and Z. Dai, “Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early-stage right side breast cancer between three techniques: IMRT, hybrid IMRT and hybrid VMAT,” Radiation Oncology, 17(1), 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02009-2
S.O. Hunte, C.H. Clark, N. Zyuzikov, and A. Nisbet, “Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes-what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?” The British Journal of Radiology, 95(1136), 20201289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289
T.-N. Wei, H.-L. Yeh, J.-F. Lin, and C.-C. Hung, “The clinical outcome of postoperative radiotherapy using hybrid planning technique in left breast cancer after breast‐conserving surgery,” Cancer Medicine, 12(5), 5364-5371 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5358
I. I. Olaciregui-Ruiz, B. Vivas-Maiques, S. van der Velden, M.E. Nowee, B. Mijnheer, and A. Mans, “Automatic dosimetric verification of online adapted plans on the Unity MR-Linac using 3D EPID dosimetry,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, 157, 241-246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.037
D. Desai, G. Narayanasamy, M. Bimali, I. Cordrey, H. Elasmar, S. Srinivasan, and E.L. Johnson, “Cleaning the dose falloff in lung SBRT plan,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 22(1), 100 108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13113
G.M.M. Videtic, C. Hu, A.K. Singh, J.Y. Chang, W. Parker, K.R. Olivier, and S.E. Schild, “A randomized phase 2 study comparing 2 stereotactic body radiation therapy schedules for medically inoperable patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0915 (NCCTG N0927),” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 93(4), 757-764 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2260
“The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,” Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 10(2), 5-6 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndq025
I. Paddick, and B. Lippitz, “A simple dose gradient measurement tool to complement the conformity index,” Journal of neurosurgery, 105(Issue Supplement), 194-201 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.194
Copyright (c) 2023 Mohamed Ibrahim Soliman, Khaled Mohamed El Shahat, Wahib Mohamed Attia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
