A Pythagorean-Fuzzy Nonlocal Reformulation of Quantum Electrodynamics

Keywords: Nonlocal quantum field theory, Gauge-covariant regularization, Lorentz-invariant smearing, Wilson lines, Renormalization group, Pythagorean fuzzy field, Ultraviolet convergence

Abstract

Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is the most precise theory in physics, yet its assumption of pointlike interactions between charged particles and photons leads to ultraviolet divergences that require renormalization. This paper proposes a Pythagorean-Fuzzy Nonlocal Reformulation of QED, embedding structured uncertainty directly into the interaction framework. Each spacetime region is described by a Pythagorean fuzzy field with degrees of membership, non-membership, and hesitation, quantifying how strongly an event participates in an interaction and how precisely it can be localized. The conventional point vertex is replaced by a smooth, gauge-covariant nonlocal coupling modulated by a Lorentz-invariant kernel and the fuzzy field’s defuzzified weight. This structure preserves all symmetries of QED while automatically suppressing short-distance divergences. Ultraviolet divergences are suppressed at their origin, yielding finite self-energy and vacuum-polarization contributions within the nonlocal framework, without the appearance of divergent counter terms. Physically, the formulation interprets quantum interactions as finite “fuzzy” processes distributed over regions of limited definability. Mathematically, it unites the logic of Pythagorean fuzzy sets with the geometry of field theory, providing a natural regularization mechanism that remains fully consistent with standard QED in the sharp-local limit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R.R. Yager, “Pythagorean fuzzy subsets,” in: Proc. 2013 Joint IFSA/NAFIPS World Congress and Annual Meeting, (IEEE, Edmonton, AB, Canada), pp. 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375

R.R. Yager, “Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(4), 958–965 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989

X. Peng, and Y. Yang, “Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. 30(11), 1133–1160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21738

J. Mahanta, and S. Panda, “Distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with varied applications,” Neural Comput. Appl. 33(24), 17161–17171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06308-9 (PMID: 34376923, PMCID: PMC8339398)

M. Kirişci, “New type Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and decision-making application,” arXiv:1904.04064 [math.GM].

M.C. Bozyiğit, M. Olgun, and M. Ünver, “Circular Pythagorean fuzzy sets and applications to multi-criteria decision making,” Informatica, 34(4), 713–742 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15388/23-INFOR529

G.V. Efimov, “Nonlocal quantum field theory, nonlinear interaction Lagrangians, and the convergence of the perturbation-theory series,” Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 217–223 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01038039

N.V. Krasnikov, “Introduction to nonlocal field theory including gravity,” Phys. Part. Nucl. 55, 1467–1473 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779624701107

V.A. Alebastrov, and G.V. Efimov, “Causality in quantum field theory with nonlocal interaction,” Commun. Math. Phys. 38(1), 11–28 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01651546

A. Idilbi, and I. Scimemi, “Singular and regular gauges in soft-collinear effective theory: the introduction of the new Wilson line T,” Phys. Lett. B, 695, 463–468 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.060; arXiv:1009.2776 [hep-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1009.2776

S. Gukov, and A. Kapustin, “Topological quantum field theory, nonlocal operators, and gapped phases of gauge theories,” arXiv:1307.4793 [hep-th]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.4793

M.E. Peskin, and D.V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1995).

Published
2026-03-14
Cited
How to Cite
Mukherjee, S. (2026). A Pythagorean-Fuzzy Nonlocal Reformulation of Quantum Electrodynamics. East European Journal of Physics, (1), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2026-1-17