Participatory democracy in war conditions: foreign experience and prospects for Ukraine.

  • Oleksandr Rudenko National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, 17 V. Manko Str., Kharkiv, 61070, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4439-1185
Keywords: participatory democracy, martial law, participatory budgeting, civic engagement, democratic resilience, post-conflict reconstruction

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the transformation of participatory democracy mechanisms in martial law based on the analysis of international experience and Ukrainian practice.

The relevance of the study is due to the need to preserve and adapt democratic institutions during a full-scale war, when traditional forms of public participation require rethinking.

The introduction substantiates the problem of balancing between the security needs of the state and the preservation of democratic values, and analyzes the challenges for participatory practices in martial law. The literature review systematizes scientific research on the functioning of participatory democracy during armed conflicts in different countries of the world, in particular in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Syria, and El Salvador. Theoretical approaches to crisis management with citizen participation and empirical studies of the impact of military experience on civic activity are considered.

The research methodology is based on comparative analysis, a systemic approach and a case-study method to study specific practices of participatory budgeting, public consultations and volunteer activities in wartime. The methods of content analysis of documents of international organizations and secondary analysis of sociological research were applied.

The main results of the study demonstrate that martial law does not exclude the possibility of preserving mechanisms of participatory democracy, but on the contrary, stimulates the development of new forms of civic activity. The experience of the Ukrainian model of adapting participatory practices is analyzed, in particular, the transformation of public budgets, the creation of online platforms for consultations, and large-scale volunteer mobilization. Specific characteristics of the Ukrainian model are identified that distinguish it from post-conflict contexts in other countries due to the simultaneous conduct of active hostilities and the preservation of democratic procedures.

The study shows the critical role of digital technologies in ensuring citizen participation in conditions of limited mobility and security risks. It is established that Ukrainian practice demonstrates the phenomenon of increased civic activism in conditions of existential threat, which contrasts with the hypothesis of the inevitable curtailment of democratic processes during war. The role of international organizations in supporting participatory practices and their contribution to building the institutional capacity of Ukrainian municipalities is analyzed.

The conclusions emphasize the uniqueness of the Ukrainian case as an example of a “resilient democracy” capable of preserving and developing mechanisms of public participation even in conditions of full-scale aggression. The key factors of the success of the Ukrainian model are identified, including previous experience of democratization, developed civil society, international support and digital transformation.

The prospects for the further development of participatory democracy in the context of the future reconstruction of Ukraine and the potential contribution of Ukrainian experience to the global practice of supporting democracy in conflict and post-conflict societies are outlined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Rudenko, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, 17 V. Manko Str., Kharkiv, 61070, Ukraine

Postgraduate Student, Department of Economics and Public Administration

References

Andriychuk, T.S. (2018). Modern Democracy: Problems and Development Prospects. Gileya: Scientific Bulletin, is. 138, 150–154. URL: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/andriichuk_suchasna.pdf

Hanzhuk, O. (2024). Participatory Democracy in Ukraine: Status and Conditions of Implementation. Ukrainian Journal of Constitutional Law, no. 1, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.30970/jcl.1.2024.3

Ivashchenko, O. (2023). On war and society in the scientific periodicals of Ukraine under the conditions of a full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine (2022–2023). Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, no. 4, 134–155. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.04.134

Kovalevska, D. (2023). Deliberative democracy in the processes of interaction between civil society and the state in Ukraine and the world. Scientific and theoretical almanac Grani, vol. 26, no. 5, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.15421/172397

Reznik, O. (2023). Involvement of Ukrainians in volunteer activities during a full-scale war. Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation. URL: https://dif.org.ua/article/oleksandr-reznik-zaluchenist-ukraintsiv-do-volonterskoi-diyalnosti-pid-chas-povnomasshtabnoi-viyni

Ukrainian society in war conditions 2022: collective monograph (2023). NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Sociology; ed. S. Makeyev, O. Ivashchenko. Kyiv, 610 p. URL: https://isnasu.org.ua/assets/files/books/2022/maket-vijna...2022dlya-tipografiivse.pdf

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2020). Collaborative crisis management: A plausibility probe of core assumptions. Policy and Society, vol. 39, no. 4, 510–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1767337

Arbatli, E., Rosenberg, D., eds. (2017). Non-Western Social Movements and Participatory Democracy: Protest in the Age of Transnationalism. Cham: Springer, 233 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51454-3

Bland, G. (2011). Supporting Post-conflict Democratic Development? External Promotion of Participatory Budgeting in El Salvador. World Development, vol. 39, no. 5, 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.015

Cabannes, Y., Lipietz, B. (2018). Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in light of competing politics, good governance and technocratic logics. Environment and Urbanization, vol. 30, no. 1, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817746279

Civil society in Ukraine – present landscape with special reference to gender equality, participatory practices and democratic innovations (2025). University of Edinburgh. URL: https://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/sites/default/files/assets/pdf/research-projects/Civil Society in Ukraine_research paper.pdf

Civil society’s role as a cornerstone of a resilient democracy highlighted at OSCE Parallel Civil Society Conference (2025). OSCE. URL: https://www.osce.org/chairpersonship/660987

Exploring New Frontiers of Citizen Participation in the Policy Cycle (2024). OECD. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/reinforcing-democracy-initiative/Exploring-New-Frontiers-of-Citizen-Participation-Discussion-Paper.pdf

Hockenos, P. Ukraine's Democracy Still Works Without Elections. Foreign Policy. (2025). 14 April. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/04/14/ukraines-democracy-still-works-without-elections/

Khodan, M., Burtnyak, I. (2024). Local budgets in Ukraine during wartime: Challenges, adaptation strategies, and the role of participatory budgeting. Lex Portus, no. 9, 89–108. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398873581_Local_budgets_in_Ukraine_during_wartime_Challenges_adaptation_strategies_and_the_role_of_participatory_budgeting

Kurtović, L. (2021). The long-term effects of war exposure on civic engagement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015539118

Mizrahi, S., Cohen, N., Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2021). How Well Do They Manage a Crisis? The Government’s Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Administration Review, vol. 81, no. 5, 1120–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13370

Participatory Budgeting in Wartime: How Are Cities Involving Citizens in Spending? (2024). Transparency International Ukraine. URL: https://ti-ukraine.org/en/news/participatory-budgeting-in-wartime-how-are-cities-involving-citizens-in-spending/

Participatory democracy at the time of war: Ukrainian municipalities plan their future now (2023). Council of Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/participatory-democracy/-/participatory-democracy-at-the-time-of-war-ukrainian-municipalities-plan-their-future-now

Rebooting school participatory budgeting and transformation of participatory budgeting mechanisms (2023). Council of Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/kyiv/-/rebooting-school-participatory-budgeting-and-transformation-of-participatory-budgeting-mechanisms-17-local-self-government-bodies-developed-draft-regulations-and-proposals-for-the-implementation

Schmidt, A. (2019). Tensions and Dilemmas in Crisis Governance: Responding to Citizen Volunteers. Administration & Society, vol. 52, no. 7, 1058–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719836734

Lutsevych, O. (2023). Giving civil society a stake in Ukraine’s recovery. Chatham House. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/06/giving-civil-society-stake-ukraines-recovery/conclusions-and-recommendations

Shenk, J.L. (2023). Does conflict experience affect participatory democracy after war? Evidence from Colombia. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 60, no. 6, 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221105112

Strengthening democratic resilience through civic participation during the war and in the post-war context in Ukraine / Council of Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/participatory-democracy/strengthening-civil-participation-in-democratic-decision-making-in-ukraine

Telalović, A. (2021). Diaspora, deliberation and democracy: examining externally-sponsored initiatives for the development of local forums in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization, vol. 29, no. 4, 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1996222

Published
2025-12-30
Section
World Experience of Public Administration: Theory and Practice