Applying blockchain technology in the election process: implications for the legitimacy of public authority and trust in public policy
Abstract
The article is devoted to researching the impact of blockchain technologies on the legitimacy of the electoral process and the level of public trust in public authorities in the context of the digitalization of democratic institutions. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to find effective mechanisms to increase the transparency of electoral processes, minimize the risks of fraud, and ensure an adequate level of trust in the results of the expression of will in the context of the growing need for remote voting formats. The main results of the study indicate the contradictory nature of the impact of blockchain technologies on electoral processes. On the one hand, the experience of Estonia demonstrates the potential of electronic voting to increase voter turnout and speed up vote counting. On the other hand, American experiments in West Virginia and Utah have revealed serious vulnerabilities in cybersecurity and problems with ensuring voting secrecy. The study identified critical challenges to the implementation of blockchain voting: the digital divide, which threatens to exclude socially vulnerable groups from the electoral process; the problem of balancing voter anonymity and verification; the risks of centralizing control over technological infrastructure; and the lack of established legal standards for regulation. In the Ukrainian context, legislative barriers were analyzed, in particular the incompatibility of the existing Electoral Code with the requirements of digital technologies and the lack of a specialized regulatory framework for cryptographic voting systems.
It has been established that the impact of blockchain voting on the legitimacy of power is twofold: technological transparency can increase trust through the possibility of independent verification of results, but the technical complexity and opacity of algorithms for ordinary citizens can lead to a decline in trust and the perception of elections as manipulated by the technocratic elite.
The study’s conclusions emphasize the need for a balanced approach to the introduction of blockchain technologies into the electoral process, which should take into account not only technological capabilities but also socio-political consequences, ensuring the inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability of electoral systems as the basis for democratic legitimacy.
Downloads
References
Electoral Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated 19 December 2019 No. 396-IX. (2020). Information from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. No. 7, No. 8, No. 9. Art. 48. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/396-20 [in Ukrainian].
Constitution of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 254k/96-VR dated 28.06.1996. (1996). Information from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. No. 30. Art. 141. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 [in Ukrainian].
On Virtual Assets: Law of Ukraine dated 17.02.2022 No. 2074-IX. (2022). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2074-20 [in Ukrainian].
On the Protection of Personal Data: Law of Ukraine No. 2297-VI of 01.06.2010. (2010). Information from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2010. No. 34. Art. 481. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17 [in Ukrainian].
Ehin, P., Solvak, M., Willemson, J., Vinkel, P. (2022). Internet voting in Estonia 2005–2019: Evidence from eleven elections. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101718
Kramer, S. (2020). E-voting: securing the franchise Estonian-style. New Eastern Europe. 1 July. URL: https://neweasterneurope.eu/2020/07/01/e-voting-securing-the-franchise-estonian-style/
Lohrmann, D. (2021). Could Estonia Be the Model for Secure Online Voting? Government Technology. 29 April. URL: https://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/could-estonia-be-the-model-for-secure-online-voting.html
McMillan, R. (2019). West Virginia will allow “blockchain voting” in the 2020 election. That’s a risky idea. MIT Technology Review. 18 April. URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/04/18/136042/west-virginia-will-allow-blockchain-voting-in-the-2020-election-thats-a-risky/
Mearian, L. (2018). West Virginia Becomes First State to Test Mobile Voting by Blockchain in a Federal Election. Government Technology. 30 April. URL: https://www.govtech.com/biz/west-virginia-becomes-first-state-to-test-mobile-voting-by-blockchain-in-a-federal-election.html
Robinson, M. (2019). West Virginia and Denver say mobile voting pilots increased turnout. StateScoop. 24 July. URL: https://statescoop.com/west-virginia-denver-mobile-voting-app-voatz-increased-turnout/
Porter, J. (2020). West Virginia Ditches Blockchain Voting App Provider Voatz. CoinDesk. 2 March. URL: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2020/03/02/west-virginia-ditches-blockchain-voting-app-provider-voatz
Marks, J. (2020). U.S. Distances Itself from Online Voting, West Virginia Gets Closer. Governing. 21 April. URL: https://www.governing.com/next/us-distances-itself-from-online-voting-west-virginia-gets-closer.html
Malyk, A. (2019). Blockchain-encrypted mobile voting comes to Utah. StateScoop. 1 August. URL: https://statescoop.com/blockchain-encrypted-mobile-voting-utah-voatz/
Goodin, D. (2018). The FBI is investigating West Virginia’s blockchain-based midterm elections. Quartz. 1 October. URL: https://qz.com/1574671/the-fbi-is-investigating-west-virginias-blockchain-based-midterm-elections
Ohize, H.O., Umar, B.U., Ajao, L.A. et al. (2024). Blockchain for securing electronic voting systems: a survey of architectures, trends, solutions, and challenges. Cluster Computing. 26 November. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04709-8
Barzegar, H.R., Andersson, K., Mayouf, M. (2024). Blockchain-Based E-Voting Systems: A Technology Review. Electronics, Vol. 13, No. 1, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13010017
Hjálmarsson, F., Hreiðarsson, G., Hamdaqa, M., Hjálmtýsson, G. (2018). Blockchain-Based E-Voting System. 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), P. 983–986. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00151
Peelam, S., Bhadoria, R.S., Lee, J.-G. (2024). DemocracyGuard: Blockchain-based secure voting framework for digital democracy. Expert Systems. e13694. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13694
Blockchain Voting Apps: Securing Transparent Elections. (2025). QSS Technosoft.
Park, S., Specter, M., Narula, N., Rivest, R.L. (2021). Going from bad to worse: from Internet voting to blockchain voting. Journal of Cybersecurity, Vol. 7, No. 1, tyaa025. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaa025
Jefferson, D. The Myth of “Secure” Blockchain Voting. U.S. Vote Foundation. URL: https://www.usvotefoundation.org/blockchain-voting-is-not-a-security-strategy
Greenbaum, J. Blockchain Voting: An Inevitable Threat to Democracy. U.S. Vote Foundation. URL: https://www.usvotefoundation.org/blockchain-threat-to-democracy
Ahmed, S. 2024. Can Blockchain Voting Revolutionize Democracy in Complex Electoral Systems? SSRN. April 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5143961
Smith, M. (2023). Blockchain Technology and the Future of Online Voting: Opportunities and Challenges. LinkedIn. February 23. URL: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/blockchain-technology-future-online-voting-challenges-matthew-smith
Blockchain-based voting systems increase the transparency and security of elections. (2025). ITM Web of Conferences, Vol. 73, Article 02004. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257302004
Hossain, Md.M., Bhuiyan, T., Islam, Md.C. et al. (2024). Empowering Democracy: Unlocking the Brilliance of Blockchain Technology in Smart and Secure Electronic Voting Systems. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing Advances, 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3723178.3723191
Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Laws & Regulations 2026 | Ukraine. (2025). Global Legal Insights. October 21. URL: https://www.globallegalinsights.com/practice-areas/blockchain-cryptocurrency-laws-and-regulations/ukraine/
Abouzeid, N. (2016). Ukrainian government plans to test an election platform based on the Ethereum blockchain. Bitcoin Magazine. February 16. URL: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/ukraine-government-plans-to-trial-ethereum-blockchain-based-election-platform-1455641691
Expert guide to cryptocurrency regulation in Ukraine. (2025). CMS Law. June 24. URL: https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-crypto-regulation/ukraine
Shaikh, A., Adhikari, N., Nazir, A., et al. (2024). Blockchain-based election integrity: a robust model for secure digital voting systems in Oman. F1000Research, Vol. 14, Article 223. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154800.2
Miller, K.R. (2018). Bitcoin, Blockchain, and Ballots: Technical Communication and Trust in Electoral Systems. Technical Communication, Vol. 65, No. 4, 359–375. URL: https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2018/11/08/bitcoin-blockchain-and-ballots-technical-communication-and-trust-in-electoral-systems/