Comparative analysis of theoretical models of digital citizen engagement: European experience and Ukrainian realities

Keywords: citizen engagement, e-democracy, e-consultations, participatory budgeting, platforms, digital transformation, decentralisation.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of theoretical models of digital citizen engagement in European and Ukrainian contexts. The research systematises the main theoretical approaches: institutional-procedural, socio-technical, participatory-deliberative, ecosystem-based and innovation-transformational. The Baltic, Scandinavian, Central European, Turkish and Ukrainian models are compared according to criteria of institutional embeddedness, technological integration, socio-cultural contextualisation and transformational potential. The development and implementation of key digital engagement tools are analysed: e-consultations, participatory budgeting, e-petitions and direct democracy platforms. The conceptual foundations for adapting European digital engagement practices to Ukrainian realities are substantiated, taking into account the specifics of transformational processes in the local self-government system. Five adaptation models are proposed: security-oriented digital engagement, integrated civic participation, crisis-adaptive governance, inclusive digital engagement and international integration of digital democracy. The research demonstrates that mechanical copying of even the most successful European models is ineffective without considering Ukraine's unique context of simultaneous decentralisation, digitalisation and countering external aggression. The findings establish that the most promising approaches for Ukraine are tools and methods that ensure resilience and security under digital threats, adaptability in crisis conditions and inclusivity for overcoming the digital divide. The study substantiates that Ukrainian experience of digital engagement during wartime may offer valuable insights for global digital democracy practices and creates innovative potential for developing new forms of civic participation in complex security environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Larysa Velychko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Doctor of Law, Professor,
Head of the Department of Law, National Security and European Integration,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,
4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Lina Ignatenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Law, National Security and European Integration,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,
4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

Fedorak, V. (2022). How to participate in the Digital Europe Programme: project examples, open calls, project proposal preparation / U-LEAD with Europe. Retrieved from https://u-lead.org.ua/news/112

European Commission. (2022). Advancing Europe's digital decade. Retrieved from https://state-of-the-union.ec.europa.eu/state-union-2022/state-union-achievements/advancing-europes-digital-decade_en

Boczkowski, P. J., & Matassi, M. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245–259.

Chan, M., & Yi, J. (2024). Social media use and political engagement in polarized times: Examining the contextual roles of issue and affective polarization in developed democracies. Political Communication, 41(5), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325423

International Observatory on Participatory Democracy. (2022). Helsinki's participation and interaction model. Retrieved from https://oidp.net/en/practice.php?id=1230 (Title from screen)

Jungherr, A., Gonzalo, D., & Gayo-Avello, R. (2020). Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lonkila, M., & Jokivuori, P. (2022). Sharing and liking as youth nano-level participation: Finnish students' civic and political engagement in social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 26(6), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2049731

Milne, R. G., & Gibb, K. (2016). Using economic analysis to increase civic engagement. Contemporary Social Science, 11(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2016.1223870

Ministry of Finance of Finland. (n.d.). Digitalisation. Retrieved from https://vm.fi/en/digitalisation

Mitov, S. (2024, March 1). Three custom AI solutions to implement to increase efficiency in 2024. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2024/03/01/three-custom-ai-solutions-to-implement-toincrease-efficiency-in-2024

OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Government Review of Türkiye: Towards a digitally-enabled government. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3958d102-en

Brookings. (n.d.). Ukraine: Digital government is central to resilience. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ukraine-digital-government-is-central-to-resilience

United Nations. (2025). UN E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development with the addendum on Artificial Intelligence. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2024-09/%28Web%20version%29%20E-Government%20Survey%202024%201392024.pdf

United Nations. (2024, April 1). Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development (A/RES/78/265). General Assembly. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jqngsb

Published
2025-06-04
How to Cite
Velychko, L., & Ignatenko, L. (2025). Comparative analysis of theoretical models of digital citizen engagement: European experience and Ukrainian realities. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 1(66), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2025-1-12
Section
Political and Legal Basis for Public Administration