PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN SOCIETY IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION AND A NEW HOLOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO THE EVOLUTION OF CIVILIZATION
Abstract
A new approach to the digitalization of modern society is proposed, the scientific proposal of applying new holographic approaches that have recently become widespread in cosmology, philosophy of science, information theories and consciousness studies seem relevant. The purpose of the study is to analyze digitalization as a multicomponent phenomenon, the complexity of which requires several new scientific metaphors, for example, the metaphors of emergence and holographic design. Methods: analytical method, synergistic and holographic principle, holistic approach to society, socio-philosophical analysis, theories of information and information society. Scientific novelty. Digital transformation not only changes technical infrastructures, but also radically records the anthropological, sociocultural and ontological foundations of human existence. Based on modern works on the philosophy of digitalization and digital ethics (C. Burr, L. Floridi, A. Grunwald, E.O. Pedersen), the authors compare them with holographic models of the Universe, dark energy and consciousness (D. Bohm, V.J.A.J. Førde, S. Ghaffari, W.B. Miller Jr, A.V. Melkikh, R. Valverde). Based on this, the thesis is substantiated that the digital society can be interpreted as a specific «holographic layer» of civilizational development, where information structures and platforms play the role of local «screens» of deeper quantum-informational configurations of reality. It is shown that civilizational development appears as a multi-level encoding and decoding of information. Conclusions. The concept of a holographic digital civilization is proposed, within which: digitalization is considered as a process of multi-level design of information structures; The holographic principle acts as an ontological metaphor and at the same time a scientific model for describing the emergence of the Universe and social systems; there is a need for a new holistic ethics – the ethics of the digital age, which is understood as a «holographic ethics of responsibility», where local decisions should become projections of global information changes. On this basis, the understanding of freedom, subjectivity and the limits of algorithmic control is clarified, and the prospects for a transdisciplinary dialogue between the philosophy of technology, the philosophy of science, information theory and cognitive science are outlined.
Downloads
References
Geertz, C. (2001). Interpretation culture. Selected essay. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter. 542 p. (in Ukrainian).
Rawls, J. (2001). A Theory of Justice. Kyiv: Basics, 2001. 822 p. (in Ukrainian).
Bohm, D. (1983). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York: Routledge, 1983. 240 p. .
Burr, C., Floridi, L. (2020). (Eds.). Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cham: Springer, 2020. <https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1>.
Devterov, I., Tokar, L., Silverstrova, O., Lozo, O., Poperechna, G. (2024). Philosophical Dimensionns of Digital Transformation and Their Impact on the Future. Futurity Philosophy, n.3 (4). p.4-19. <https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2024.12.30.01>. .
Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 380 p.
Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 248 p. .
Førde, V.J.A.J. (2025). The Quantum Geometry of Consciousness: Synthesist Mechanics, Scientific Incompatibilities, Super-Intelligent AI, and the Perception of Reality. Open Access Library Journal, 12, P.1-19. <https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113392> .
Ghaffari, S., Luciano, G., Capozziello, S. (2023). Barrow Holographic Dark Energy in the Brans-Dicke Cosmology. European Physical Journal Plus, Vol.138, 82. <https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03481-1>. .
Grunwald, A. (2019). Digitalisierung als Prozess. Ethische Herausforderungen inmitten allmählicher Verschiebungen zwischen Mensch, Technik und Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 20(2). S. 121-145. DOI: 10.5771/1439-880X-2019-2-121. [in German]
Grunwald, A. (2024). Understanding the Digital Transformation. Philosophical Perspectives on Potentially Gradual Disruptions. Philosophy & Digitality, Vol. 1, №1. <https://doi.org/10.18716/pd.v1i1.2412>. .
Guenduez, A., Walker, N., Demircioglu, M. (2025). Digital ethics: Global trends and divergent paths. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 42, Issue 3 (September), 102050. . <https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.giq.2025.102050>. .
Hooft, G. (2024). The hidden ontological variable in quantum harmonic oscillators. Front. Quantum Sci. Technol., 3, 1505593. <https://doi.org/ 10.3389/frqst.2024.1505593>. .
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 263 p. .
Melkikh, A.V. (2023). Thinking, Holograms, and the quantum Brain. Biosystems, Vol.229, n. July, 104926. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104926>. .
Miller, W.B. Jr. (2023). A scale-free universal relational information matrix (N-space) reconciles the information problem: N-space as the fabric of reality. Commuticative and Integrative Biology, Vol.16, n. 1, 2193006. p.1-31. <https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2023.2193006>. .
Pedersen, E.O., Brincker, M. (2021). Philosophy and Digitization: Dangers and Possibilities in the New Digital Worlds. SATS, 22(1). p.1-9. <https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2021-0006>. .
Saridakis, E. N. (2020). Barrow holographic dark energy. Phys. Revue, V.102,12, 123525. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123525>. .
Sattlegger, A., Alleblas, J., van de Poel, I. (2025). Digital ethics by design. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Design for Values Approach in Practice. Journal of Responsible Innovation, Vol. 12, n.1, 2534273. <https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2025.2534273>. .
Susskind, L. (1995). The World as a Hologram. Journal Math. Physics, Vol.36, Issue.11, 6377-6396. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.531249>. .
Tsoi, T., Lohvynenko, V., Shnitser, M. (2025). The Philosophy of Freedom in the Digital Age: How Technology changes our Understanding of Choice. Philosophy and Governance, 10(14). <https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2025.10.06>.
Valverde, R., Korotkov, K., Swanson, Ch. (2022). Quantum Hologram Theory of Consciousness as a Framework for Altered States of Consciousness Research. NeuroQuantology, March, Vol.20, Issue 3. p.187-197. <https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.3.NQ22059>.
Zimmerli, W. (2021). Künstliche Intelligenz und postanaloges Menschsein. Entstehung, Entwicklung und Wirkung eines realen Mythos. Künstliche Intelligenz – Die grosse Verheissung. MoMo Berlin Philosophische KonTexte Band 8. Berlin: Xenomoi. S. 193-220. (in German).