ФИЛОСОФИЯ ДОСТОВЕРНОСТИ ЗНАНИЯ

Abstract

Проведен сравнительный анализ определений существования и удостоверения объектов
обыденного и научного познания. Показано, что эволюция научного познания размывает границу
между объективно и субъективно существующим. Это влечёт за собой неясность онтологии
научного знания, которая затрудняет его углубление.
Ключевые слова: существование, удостоверение, онтология.

V. Budko. Philosophy of attesting knowledge. Definitions of scientific objects’ existence and
attesting for scientific knowledge in their evolution are analysed in the article. It is mentioned that
specification of existence’s concepts in terms of direct and indirect observables, relative and on principle
unobservables, separable and unseparable objects, broaden the field of existing, but obliterate
distinctions between objective and subjective existence of scientific objects. Philosophical premises and
scientific preconditions to change definitions of attesting for scientific knowledge were revealed. They are
empiricism and pragmatism, on the one hand, and sating of scientific knowledge with mathematics
moving away primaries experience’s generalizations, on the other hand. In particular the mathematics
inspires to plan immense experiments which eliminate a researcher as a subject who carries out them.
Oblitarating distinctions between objective and subjective existing, attestable and unattestable with
experiment make for vagueness in ontology of scientific knowledge that hamper its further development.
Keywords: existence, attesting, ontology.