Polarization Effects in the Reaction d+eˉ → d+eˉ

  • Gennadiy I. Gakh National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Mykhailo I. Konchatnyi National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-5348
  • Nikolay P. Merenkov National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-3827
  • Andrij G. Gakh V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-1448
  • Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-3948
Keywords: polarization phenomena, electron, deuteron, asymmetries, form factors

Abstract

The differential cross section and polarization observables for the elastic reaction induced by deuteron scattering off electrons at rest,  are calculated in the one-photon-exchange approximation. The following polarization observables were calculated: 1- the analyzing powers (asymmetries) due to the tensor polarization of the deuteron beam, 2 - the spin correlation coefficients caused by the arbitrarily polarized electron target and the vector polarized deuteron beam, 3 - the coefficients of the polarization transfer from the arbitrarily polarized target electron to the recoil electrons. The differential cross section and polarization observables have been expressed in terms of the deuteron electromagnetic form factors:  (charge monopole),  (magnetic dipole) and  (charge quadrupole). Numerical estimations are given for the analyzing powers (asymmetries) due to the tensor polarization of the deuteron beam. They are calculated as functions of the deuteron beam energy for some values of the scattering angle (the angle between the deuteron beam and the recoil electron momenta). For the numerical calculation we use the existing phenomenological parametrization of the deuteron electromagnetic form factors. It turns out that the analyzing powers (asymmetries) are increasing with the growth of the deuteron beam energy and they have appreciable sensitivity to the value of the scattering angle. The specific interest of this reaction is to investigate the possibility to use this reaction for the measurement of the polarization of the high energy deuteron beams.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Adylov at al., Phys. Lett. B51, 402(1974), https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(74)90239-1.

E. B. Dally at al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1176(1977), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1176.

E. B. Dally at al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 375(1982), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.375.

E. B. Dally at al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 232(1980), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.232.

S. R. Amendolia et al. ( NA7), Nucl. Phys. B277, 168 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90437-2.

S. R. Amendolia et al., Phys.Lett. B146, 116(1984), https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)90655-5.

G. Abbiendi(INFN, Bologna),C.M. Carloni Calame(INFN, Pavia), U. Marconi(INFN, Bologna), C. Matteuzzi(INFN, Milan Bicocca), G. Montagna(Pavia U. and INFN, Pavia) et al., Eur. Phys. J. C77,139 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4633-z.

Rene Reifarth and Yuri A. Litvinov, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 014701 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.014701.

M. P. Taggart at al., Phys. Lett. B798, 134894(2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134894.

M. P. Williams at al., Phys. Rev. C102, 035801(2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.035801.

Nguyen Tri Toan Phuc, Kazuki Yoshida and Kazuyuki Ogata, Phys. Rev. C100, 064604 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.064604.

M. Holl at al., Phys. Lett. B795, 682 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.069.

I.V. Glavanakov, Yu.F. Krechetov A.P. Potylitsyn, G.M. Radutsky, A.N. Tabachenko et al., Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A381, 275 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00714-0.

G. I. Gakh, A. Dbeyssi, D. Marchand, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson and V. V. Bytev, Phys. Rev. C84, 015212 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.015212.

G. I. Gakh, A. Dbeyssi, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, D. Marchand and V. V. Bytev, Phys. Part.Nucl. Lett. 10, 393 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477113050099.

G. I. Gakh, M.I. Konchatnij, N.P. Merenkov and E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Phys. Rev. C95, 055207 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.055207.

G. I. Gakh, M.I. Konchatnij, N.P. Merenkov and E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Phys. Rev. C98, 045212 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.055212.

E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, G. I. Gakh and C. Adamuscin, Phys. Rev. C73, 045204 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.045204.

Published
2021-04-28
Cited
How to Cite
Gakh, G. I., Konchatnyi, M. I., Merenkov, N. P., Gakh, A. G., & Tomasi-Gustafsson, E. (2021). Polarization Effects in the Reaction d+eˉ → d+eˉ. East European Journal of Physics, (2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2021-2-04