GAMIFICATION AND INTERACTIVE METHODS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS

V. V. TUPCHENKO V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-3855
M. V. PASICHNYK V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-2199

Keywords: gamification, interactive methods, English for engineers, professional communication, technical terminology, project-based learning, digital educational platforms, learning motivation

Abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2025-85-17

This article aims to examine the effectiveness of interactive methods and gamification in teaching English to engineering students. The primary focus is on combining the mastery of technical terminology with developing communication skills, teamwork, and critical thinking, which are key competencies for future engineers in an international professional environment.

Methods. The study uses an analysis of current scientific literature on gamification, interactive learning, and professional language training for engineers; a review of practical examples of the implementation of interactive platforms (Kahoot, Quizizz, Padlet, Miro, Duolingo for Schools); and a description of role-playing, debate, and project-based learning methods in study groups of technical students.

Results. The study showed that interactive methods and gamification elements increase student motivation, promote effective acquisition of technical terminology, and develop practical communication skills. Role-playing games, debates, and team projects develop collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity skills, creating conditions close to real professional activity. Digital platforms ensure interactivity, instant feedback, and support for collective work even outside the classroom.

Conclusions. Interactive and gamified approaches significantly increase the effectiveness of the learning process and the competitiveness of engineering students. The successful implementation of such methods requires proper preparation of materials, technical resources, and adaptation of students to new learning formats.

In cites: Tupchenko V. V., Pasichnyk M. V. (2025). Gamification and interactive methods in foreign language teaching for engineering students. Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education, (85), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2025-85-17

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bryntseva, O., Podorozhna, A. (2023). Business-playing as an interactive form of foreign language learning in the context of higher engineering education. Problems of Engineer-Pedagogical Education, (78), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.32820/2074-8922-2023-78-23-28 (in Ukrainian).
2. Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Liu, Y.-H., Tai, K.-H. (2020). Effects of gamifying questions on English grammar learning mediated by epistemic curiosity and language anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1458–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803361
3. Hsu, Y.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., Wang, C.-Y., Chen, N.-S. (2012). Research Trends in Technology-based Learning from 2000 to 2009: A content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354-370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.
4. Hung, H. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: Bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090
5. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207270.2211316
6. Keller, T., Guggemos, J., Warwas, J. (2025). Digital educational escape rooms as a novel approach to cybersecurity education: An empirical study on learner perceptions of usefulness and usability. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 20, 100785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100785
7. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
8. Mora, A., Riera, D., González, C., Arnedo-Moreno, J. (2017). Gamification: A systematic review of design frameworks. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 516–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9150-4
9. Reinhardt, J. (2019). Gameful second and foreign language teaching and learning: Theory, research, and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04729-0
10. Reynolds, E. D., Taylor, B. (2020). Kahoot!: EFL instructors’ implementation experiences and impacts on students’ vocabulary knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(2), 70–92. https://old.callej.org/journal/21-2/Reynolds-Taylor2020.pdf
11. Setiawan, M. R., Wiedarti, P. (2020). The effectiveness of Quizlet application towards students’ motivation in learning vocabulary. Studies in English Language Education, 7(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15359
12. Shortt, M., Tilak, S., Kuznetcova, I., Martens, B., Akinkuolie, B. (2021). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 517–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540
13. Veljkovic Michos, Maja. (2017). Gamification in Foreign Language Teaching: Do You Kahoot? SINTEZA 2017. International scientific conference on information technology and data related research. Modern technologies in language teaching, 511-516. https://doi.org/10.15308/SINTEZA-2017-511-516 .
14. Zhang, S., Hasim, Z. (2023). Gamification in EFL/ESL instruction: A systematic review of empirical research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1030790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030790
15. Zou, D. (2020). Gamified flipped EFL classroom for primary education: Student and teacher perceptions. Journal of Computer Education, 7, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00153-w