ISSN 2074-8930 (Online)
ISSN 2074-8922 (Print)
Article processing charges (APC) policy
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
Articles must a) contain undeniable scientific novelty; b) take into account leading modern publications on the relevant issues and the history of its consideration; c) correspond to the scientific priorities of the journal. By submitting material to " Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education", the author expresses his agreement with the editorial policy, ethical principles of reviewing and editing articles, open access policy, copyright and confidentiality provisions in force in our journal.
To submit a new submission, click on the “New Submission” button on the right side of the screen.
To begin, select the appropriate section for your submission (e.g., article).
Read the Submission Checklist and indicate that you agree to the requirements, then click on the “Save and Continue” button.
A window will open where you MUST select the article component. This will allow you to upload your submission file. Click on the “Continue” button.
You will then be prompted to add information about the submission, including the title of the submission, abstract, and additional contributors.
The UDC (Universal Decimal Classification) index – without indentation, left alignment, in capital letters, low-fat font.
Name and surname of the author (authors) – center alignment, bold font, capital, 11pt, academic degree and title (pt11).
position at work
e-mail and ORCID of the author (authors) – 11pt, centered alignment
The full name of the institution – 11pt, Italic, centered alignment
The institution address – 11pt, centered alignment
Title of the manuscript – in capital letters, 11pt, center alignment, bold font.
Abstract
Main text
In-Text References
In-text references should be submitted in square brackets in the order of the references in the text
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT.The authors declare financial or any other conflict of interest at the end of the article. They must indicate all sources of finance (grants, programs, etc). If there is no conflict of interest, the authors should state: “The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.” You also need to indicate the Contribution of the authors here and declare whether all authors have made an equal contribution to this work.
The authors also declare here whether or not they have used an artificial intelligence resource.
"Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education" uses the APA (American Psychological Association) reference style.
References must contain sources of at least 17, including: the share of references to work of the last 5 years is not less than 50%; the share of references to Scopus and WOS publications not less than 15%; the share of references to the publications of the author and co-authors is not more than 10% - size 10, line spacing 1.0. References are given in square brackets with the number in the order of reference in the text.
If necessary, you can see the full text of the "Publication manual of the American Psychological Association"
You can also refer to the "APA Style Guide to Electronic References".
APA 6th format rules and the relevant examples can be found here, here and here.
Authors must:
Information obtained by authors privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. By submitting an article to the editorial board, the authors agree that (in the case of publication in the paper version of the Journal) their text will be automatically published in the online version of the Journal (under open access).
See also: "Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors".
The potential of using artificial intelligence (hereinafter referred to as AI) technologies is recognized as an integral part of the modern world, transforming science, increasing the efficiency of research and automating routine processes.
The policy "Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education" on the use of artificial intelligence aims to establish a clear, transparent and ethical framework for the use of AI technologies in scientific research and prevent the uncontrolled use of generative models with risks to academic integrity, critical thinking and information security.
The use of AI is based on the following principles
Academic integrity and the consequences of undeclared use of AI.
Undeclared use: if the author of using AI submits a work that is fully or partially generated by AI without a corresponding declaration, this qualifies as academic plagiarism or fabrication.
− We recognize that the available technical means of detecting AI are not perfect and may give false positive results. Therefore, the detector report cannot be the only evidence of a violation of academic integrity. The final decision on the integrity of the use of AI detected by the detector is made for articles in scientific periodicals and collections of scientific works by the editorial board of the scientific periodical (collection of scientific works);
Recommendations for the use of AI.
− for translation and analysis of scientific materials in foreign languages, which contributes to deeper research of the topic and expansion of the source base;
− for searching, systematizing information on the research topic and abstracting scientific publications on the research topic within the subject area. This allows to speed up the processing of large volumes of literature, but requires mandatory verification of the correctness of references to primary sources;
− for analyzing large volumes of data, identifying non-obvious patterns, correlations and forming primary hypotheses, especially in interdisciplinary research. In this case, confirmation of the obtained results by traditional scientific methods is mandatory;
− for performing technical tasks: formatting lists of literature according to publication standards, stylistic editing of texts, translation of scientific works into foreign languages, construction of a semantic network of the subject area of research, creation of illustrations and visualization of data (graphs, diagrams, figures), etc.;
− to search for analogues and prototypes when creating inventions or utility models, by analyzing the database and publication;
− for critical analysis of one’s own scientific texts: searching for logical errors, weak arguments, assessing the novelty of ideas, etc.;
− to analyze the manuscript for automatic (unconscious) repetition of fragments of the author’s text that were published earlier, in order to comply with the requirements of academic integrity.
The technical editor of “Man and the Environment. Problems of Neoecology” may check scientific articles for the likelihood of using AI using appropriate technical means of detection (detectors).
We recognize that the available technical means of detecting AI are not perfect and may give false positive results. Therefore, the detector report cannot be the only evidence of a violation of academic integrity.
The final decision on the integrity of the use of AI in the article detected by the detector is made by the editorial board of “Man and the Environment. Problems of Neoecology”.
Declaration on the use of artificial intelligence
Successful publication depends not only on the scientific quality of the article, but also on how ethically, transparently and correctly the author uses AI.
When the declaration is mandatory:
Where to place the declaration: in the Methods section - recommended for technical description, in our journal after the Conflict of Interest section.
Template 1. (minimal use of AI: (language editing) “The authors used ChatGPT-5.1 (OpenAI, 2025) solely for language editing and grammar correction. All scientific content, interpretations, and conclusions were generated by the authors. The final text was reviewed and verified by the authors”
Template 2. (AI helped to structure or summarize the text). Generative AI tools (ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, 2025) were used to summarize background literature and improve the organization of the manuscript. No AI-generated text was used without critical editing. The authors take full responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the content.
Template 3. (AI in data processing or data analysis). AI tools (Gemini Advanced, 2025) were used for preliminary data classification. All datasets were generated by the authors, and all analyses were verified manually. No synthetic or AI-generated data were used.
Template 4. (AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript). All usage was limited to language editing and organizational support. The authors remain fully responsible for the content, data and conclusions.
See also: COPE position statement about authorship and AI tools
Our journal does not charge any fees to authors for submitting, reviewing, processing, or publishing articles. Publication is completely free for authorsincluding applicants for the third level of higher education.
Authors submitting publications for this edition agree to the following terms:
Authors' Responsibility
Publisher's Responsibility
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.