INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND ADAPTATION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE COURSES FOR ENGINEERING UNIVERSITIES
Abstract
DOJ: https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2025-85-04
In the current context of globalization and international cooperation, proficiency in English is an essential component of professional training for engineering students. The study's relevance is due to the existing gap between international standards of English language teaching and traditional courses for engineering universities, which limits effective communication of students in professional and academic contexts.
The study aims to analyze and justify ways of adapting English language courses for engineering universities in accordance with international standards (CEFR, ABET, ISO) aimed at developing students' linguistic and professional competence.
The methods included analysis of scientific sources and foreign practices of teaching English for engineers (ESP), comparison of traditional and adapted courses, and a description of practical techniques: integration of technical cases, project-oriented learning, role-playing games, discussions, and the use of digital platforms.
The study results demonstrate that adapted ESP courses contribute to the development of technical terminology, documentation skills, presentation and discussion competencies, and team interaction in an international professional environment. Using interactive and gamified methods increases student motivation and knowledge acquisition's effectiveness in real professional situations.
The conclusions are that introducing international standards into English language courses for engineering universities is strategically important for improving the level of education, developing practical skills, and ensuring students' competitiveness in the global labor market. Adapted courses allow Ukrainian engineers to integrate into the international scientific and technical space and participate in joint academic and professional projects.
In cites: Zelenin H. I. (2025). International standards and adaptation of English language courses for engineering universities. Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education, (85), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2025-85-04
Downloads
References
2. Bryntseva, O. V. (2020). Professionally oriented teaching of foreign language writing of engineering students. Problems of Engineer-Pedagogical Education, 69, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.32820/2074-8922-2020-69-85-91 (in Ukrainian).
3. Hatam, A., Shafiei, S. (2012). The evaluation of the effectiveness of ESP courses in enhancing technical translation proficiency: A case study of ESP course for mechanical engineering students. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n5p68
4. Jones, N., Saville, N. (2009). European language policy: Assessment, learning, and the CEFR. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190509090059
5. Kelley, N. (2006). Sentence structure of technical writing. Program in Writing and Humanistic Studies@ MIT 2.671, Fall 2006. URL: https://www.studocu.com/row/document/national-college-of-arts/corporate-law/sentence-structure-usable/43302423
6. Komol, T., Sripetpun, W. (2011, April). Vocabulary learning strategies employed by undergraduate students and its relationship to their vocabulary knowledge. Proceeding from the 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science (pp. 1-18). Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.
7. Little, D. (2013). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages and the European Language Portfolio: Some history, a view of language learner autonomy, and some implications for language learning in higher education. Language Learning in Higher Education, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2012-0001
8. Lu, Y., Jiang, Y. (2018). Research on English for special purposes in China in the past 10 years: Current situation and reflections. Journal of Heilongjiang Ecological Engineering Vocational College, 5, 144–147.
9. Ngai, C. S. B., Singh, R. G., Kwan, B. S. C. (2020). A comparative study of the linguistic manifestations of intertextuality in corporate leaders’ messages of global corporations in the US and China. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.05.002
10. Peters, P., Fernandez, T. (2013). The lexical needs of ESP students in a professional field. English for Specific Purposes, 32(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.05.002
11. Poedjiastutie, D., Rifan, L. (2019). English communication needs of engineering students. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190702.13
12. Richardson, S., Arkoudis, S., Baik, C. (2012). English language standards in higher education: From entry to exit. Camberwell: ACER Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351987021_English_Language_Standards_in_Higher_Education_From_Entry_to_Exit
13. Shevchuk, L. O., Tupchenko, V. V., Pasichnyk, M. V. (2025). Advancements in online language instruction technologies within higher vocational education. Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education, 84, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2025-84-30 (in Ukrainian).
14. Srimanee, J., Laohawiriyanon, C. (2010, April 10). Vocabulary learning strategies of Thai Grade 9 EFL students. Proceeding from the 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences. Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=FxlgOPYAAAAJ&citation_for_view=FxlgOPYAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC
15. Tupchenko, V. V., Pasichnyk, M. V. (2024). Transforming a foreign language course at an engineering university into a comprehensive distance format. Problems of Engineering Pedagogic Education, 83, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2024-83-08
