Paradoxical impact of government social expenditures on the resilience of small enterprises under economic instability: an empirical analysis
Abstract
The article examines the impact of social expenditures on the resilience of small enterprises under conditions of economic instability and structural transformations. Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence from EU and OECD countries demonstrate that the relationship between the level of social spending and the resilience of small firms is neither linear nor unambiguous. The findings indicate that, depending on the scale of social expenditures, the fiscal capacity of the state, and the overall macroeconomic environment, their influence may vary, displaying both stabilizing and constraining effects. Moderate levels of social spending help reduce the risk of small enterprises bankruptcies by supporting domestic consumer demand, mitigating social disparities, and enhancing the predictability of the economic environment. At the same time, excessive expansion of social programs under conditions of limited budgetary resources may lead to increased fiscal pressure, reduced investment capacity, and the emergence of institutional barriers to entrepreneurial development. The study emphasizes that the intensity and direction of the impact of social expenditures are largely shaped by crisis or post-crisis economic conditions. During periods of instability, the positive effects of social spending become more pronounced, whereas in stable phases, the likelihood of accumulating long-term fiscal risks increases. Particular attention is given to the Ukrainian context, where the role of social expenditures has significantly expanded due to wartime conditions and the need to ensure basic social support. It is determined that a key challenge for Ukraine is to find an optimal balance between the necessity of social protection for the population and the need to create a favorable environment for the development of small businesses. Based on the obtained results, the study formulates practical recommendations aimed at optimizing the structure of social expenditures, strengthening their targeting, improving institutional mechanisms for small enterprises support, and introducing approaches sensitive to threshold and contextual effects. The study concludes that the effectiveness of social spending in ensuring the resilience of small enterprises depends not so much on its absolute volume, but on its strategic alignment with the state’s economic capacities, structural priorities, and the quality of the institutional environment.
Downloads
References
Solomon, S., Bendickson, J.S., Liguori, E.W., & Marvel, M.R. (2022). The effects of social spending on entrepreneurship in developed nations. Small Business Economics, 58, 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00458-9
Engberg, E., Tingvall, P.G., & Halvarsson, D. (2021). Direct and indirect effects of private- and government-sponsored venture capital. Empir Econ, 60, 701–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01770-w
OECD (2023a). The rise and fall of public social spending with the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved form https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/01/the-rise-and-fall-of-public-social-spending-with-the-covid-19-pandemic_0c92ca71/12563432-en.pdf
World Bank (2020a). Survival of Firms during Economic Crisis. Retrieved form https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/content/dam/enterprisesurveys/documents/research-1/Survival-of-Firms-during-Economic-Crisis.pdf
World Bank (2023a). The Resilience of SMEs and Large Firms in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Retrieved form https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/content/dam/enterprisesurveys/documents/research-1/The%20Resilience%20of%20SMEs%20and%20Large%20Firms%20in%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic.pdf
Wagner, J. (2022). Firm Survival and Gender of Firm Owner in Times of COVID-19: Evidence from 10 European Countries. Economies. 10(5). 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050098
Reuters (2024). World Bank says 18 mln additional Ukrainians in poverty as Russia's war drags. Retrieved form https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/world-bank-says-18-mln-additional-ukrainians-poverty-russias-war-drags-2024-05-30/
World Bank (2023b). Ukraine: Third Economic Update - March 2023. Retrieved form https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099184503212328877/pdf/P1801740d1177f03c0ab180057556615497.pdf
OECD (2022). Social policies for an inclusive recovery in Ukraine. Retrieved form https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/07/social-policies-for-an-inclusive-recovery-in-ukraine_f8bc7588/506fcefb-en.pdf
European Commission (2025a). Government expenditure on social protection - Statistics Explained - Eurostat. Retrieved form https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Government_expenditure_on_social_protection
OECD (2023b). Sizing up Welfare States: How do OECD countries compare? Retrieved form https://oecdstatistics.blog/2023/02/02/sizing-up-welfare-states-how-do-oecd-countries-compare/
OECD (2025a). Social Expenditure Dashboard. Retrieved form https://www.oecd.org/en/data/dashboards/social-expenditure-dashboard.html
Chundakkadan, R., Natarajan, R. R., & Sasidharan, S. (2022). Small firms amidst COVID‐19: Financial constraints and role of government support. Economic Notes. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12206
Audretsch, D.B., Aronica, M., Belitski, M., Caddemi, D.,·& Piacentino, D. (2025). The impact of government financial aid and digital tools on firm survival during the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01014-5
OECD (2025b). Social spending. Retrieved form https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/social-spending.html
European Commission (2025b). Social protection statistics - overview - Statistics Explained - Eurostat. Retrieved form https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Social_protection_statistics_-_overview
OECD (2024). Society at a Glance 2024: OECD Social Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/918d8db3-en
World Bank (2020b). Small and Medium Enterprises in the Pandemic : Impact, Responses and the Role of Development Finance. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9414
Phiri, K., & Mahlangu, L. (2025). Evaluating the Impact of Government Subsidies and Grants on SME Growth and Financial Sustainability in Zambia. East African Finance Journal, 4(3), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v4.i3.2
Allianz Trade (2024). Global insolvencies: Risk environment improves, but the number of corporate bankruptcies remains high. Retrieved form https://www.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/azcom/Allianz_com/economic-research/publications/specials/en/2024/october/15-10-2024-Global-insolvencies-AZ.pdf
European Commission (2025c). More businesses opened than dissolved in the EU in 2023. Retrieved form https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20251013-1
GEM (2025). GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved form https://www.gemconsortium.org/report
OECD (2025c). Tax Policy. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/tax-policy.html
OECD (2025d). OECD Economic Outlook. Retrieved form https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/serials/oecd-economic-outlook_g1ghgh13.html
Dilli, S., Elert, N., & Herrmann, A. M. (2018). Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0002-z
Copyright (c) 2025 Shandova N., Stemkovskyy V.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.