Transformation of the rating system for evaluation of educational activity results as a tool for quality assurance under integration in the Еuropean higher education area

Keywords: higher education; European higher education area; international ratings; education quality; strategic development benchmarks of higher education, system of rating evaluation; evaluation indices of higher educational institutions’ activity; STEPS model; field-specific evaluation index

Abstract

The paper is a continuation of the authors’ surveys regarding the formation of an integrated methodology for the rating evaluation of the academic activity results of higher educational institutions in Ukraine, aimed at ensuring proper operation, development and enhancement of the competitive capacity of the domestic higher education system and its integration in the global educational environment and the European higher education area. It is emphasized that the results of higher educational institutions should be measured not only by extensive indices in absolute terms as relating to the degree of their integration in global systems and their resource capacity, but, in the first place, by criteria that evaluate achievement of the strategic objective of their activity as to meeting social needs. As a conceptual evaluation model, a universal STEPS model was proposed, which suggests evaluating results of higher educational institutions’ activity by clear-cut criteria within the framework of five rating categories. Additionally, a special focus was maintained on the fact that for raising the profile and increasing the practical importance of the evaluation results it is necessary to concentrate on evaluating higher educational institutions’ activity according to specific fields of training within the specified areas of knowledge and specialties. The conceptual approaches to development and implementation of higher education quality indices – integrated field-specific index and specialty-specific index of evaluating the academic activity of higher educational institutions – have been formulated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dmytro Karamyshev, KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration, Full Professor,
First Deputy Director,
KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

References

Akademichnyi reitynh zakladiv vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy “Top-200 Ukraina 2019”. URL: http://www.euroosvita.net/ [in Ukrainian].

Hrynevych, L.M. (2011). Osvitni indykatory dlia mizhnarodnoho otsiniuvannia (na prykladi dopovidi “Pohliad na osvitu 2011: indykatory OESR”). Teoriia i metodyka upravlinnia osvitoiu, 7. URL: http://arhive.nuv.gov.ua/e-journals/ttmuo/2011_7/3.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Karamyshev, D.V. (2019). Stratehichni oriientyry rozvytku monitorynhu osvitnoi diialnosti zakladiv vyshchoi osvity yak skladovoi systemy upravlinnia yakistiu. Aktualni problem derzhavnoho upravlinnia : zb. nauk. prats. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KRI NAPA “Mahistr”, 2 (56), 8–19 [in Ukrainian].

Konsolidovanyi reitynh vyshiv Ukrainy. URL: http://www.ru.osvita.ua/vnz/ rating/51741/ [in Ukrainian].

Konferentsiia IREG 2019 “Akademichni reitynhy: vyklyky i problemy dlia vyshchoi osvity”. (2019). URL: http://www.euroosvita.net/index.php/?category=1&id=5928 [in Ukrainian].

Kryterii nadannia ta pidtverdzhennia statusu natsionalnoho zakladu vyshchoi osvity, zatv. Postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 22.11.2017 r. № 912. (2017). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 99, art. 3031 [in Ukrainian].

Kuzmin, O.Ye., Melnyk, O.H., Yastrubskyi, M.Ya. (2017). Uzahalnennia polozhen analizuvannia diialnosti VNZ. Efektyvnist orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu innovatsiinoho rozvytku vyshchoi osvity: materialy VII Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konfi., 6 zhovt. 2017 r. Kyiv: KNUTD, 216–225 [in Ukrainian].

Litsenziini umovy provadzhennia osvitnoi diialnosti zakladiv osvity, zatv. Postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 30.12.2015 r. № 1187. (2016). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 7, art. 345.

Lynovytska, O. Zapyty rynku pratsi: vyklyk dlia ukrainskykh universytetiv. URL: http://www.euroosvita.net/?category=8&id=226 [in Ukrainian].

Metodyka reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia diialnosti vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv III-IV rivniv akredytatsii: nakaz MON Ukrainy vid 24.12.2009 r. № 1185. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua.

Ofitsiinyi veb-sait Tsentru mizhnarodnykh proektiv “Ievroosvita”. URL: http://euroosvita.net [in Ukrainian].

Panych, O. Zovnishnia otsinka yakosti vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini. Shcho mozhe buty zmineno? URL: http://education-ua.org/ua/articles/430-zovnishnya-otsinka-yakostivishchoji-osvitiv-ukrajini-shcho-mozhebuti-zmineno [in Ukrainian].

Paryzke komiunike vid 25 travnia 2018 r. (2018). URL: https://mon.gov.ua /storage/app/media/news2018/06/06/12/paris-communiqueenua2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Polozhennia pro akredytatsiiu osvitnikh prohram, za yakymy zdiisniuietsia pidhotovka zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity, zatv. nakazom MON Ukrainy vid 11.07.2019 r. № 977. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine. 2019. № 65. St. 2245.

Pro aprobatsiiu systemy reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia diialnosti vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv u 2008/09 navchalnomu ta 2009 kalendarnomu rokakh: nakaz MON Ukrainy vid 24.12.2009 r. № 1185. (2009). URL: http://www.nuos.edu.ua.

Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro natsionalnu systemu reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia diialnosti vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv: nakaz MON Ukrainy vid 20.12.2011 r. № 1475. (2012). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 6, 227.

Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku formuvannia Pereliku naukovykh fakhovykh vydan Ukrainy: nakaz MON Ukrainy vid 15.01.2018 r. № 32. (2018). URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0148-18.

Reitynh vyshiv “TOP-200 Ukraina”. URL: http://www.euroosvita.net/index.php/?category=3 [in Ukrainian].

Universytetski reitynhy “Top 200 Ukraina” 2010–2017 roky. URL: http://www.euroosvita.net/index.php/?category=28&id=1095 [in Ukrainian].

Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. URL: http://euroosvita.net/prog/data/doc/BerlinPrinciples.pdf.

Bottani, N. (1998). The OECD Educational Indicators: purposes, limits and production processes. Prospects, Vol. XVIII, I.

Education at a glance: OECD Indicators. URL: http://www.oecd.org.

IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence. URL: http://iregobservatory.org/en/.

Scheerens, J., Glas, C., Thomas, S. (2007). Educational Evaluation, Assessment, and Monitoring: A Systemic Approach. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.

Shanghai Ranking's Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). URL: http://www.shanghairanking.com.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). К.: CS Ltd.

World University Rankings methodology. URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2019-methodology.

URL: http:// www. qs.com.

URL: http:// www.scopus.com.

URL: http:// www.webometrics.info.

Published
2019-12-21
Section
Theory and Philosophy of Public Administration