Features of State Regulation of the Bankin Sector in the Context of Information Society Development
Abstract
The article examines the transformation of state regulation of Ukraine’s banking sector in the context of transition to the information society and digital economy. The relevance of the research is driven by the need to modernize regulatory mechanisms in the context of rapid development of financial technologies, growing cyber threats, and wartime challenges. The aim of the article is to analyze the current state of banking institutions regulation, identify main challenges, and substantiate promising directions for improving regulatory policy under digitalization conditions. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive approach combining historical-logical, comparative, structural-functional analysis, forecasting and modeling methods. The study establishes that the evolution of the regulatory paradigm is characterized by a transition from a static “command-and-control” model to an adaptive system based on principles of flexibility, proactivity, and technological neutrality. Three stages of NBU regulatory approach transformation during 2020-2024 are analyzed, including adaptation to pandemic challenges, crisis management under wartime conditions, and formation of a new regulatory philosophy. The main challenges of state regulation are systematized, covering technological aspects (exponential growth of cyber threats by 450%, algorithmic bias), institutional problems (regulatory lag of 18-24 months with fintech product lifecycle of 6-9 months), and socio-economic challenges (25% of population without access to quality internet). Three strategic vectors for improvement are substantiated: preventive regulation using predictive analytics (increases risk forecasting accuracy by 40%), collaborative interaction model (reduces regulatory uncertainty by 60-70%), creation of next-generation regulatory infrastructure. The effectiveness of transition from entity-based to activity-based regulation for eliminating regulatory arbitrage is demonstrated. The potential of machine-readable regulation to reduce compliance costs by 30-40% is identified. A “regulatory hub” model is proposed as a coordination mechanism between NBU, NSSMC, cyber police and other regulators through a unified digital platform. The architecture of RegTech/SupTech solutions based on blockchain, API interfaces and distributed ledger technologies is developed. Practical significance lies in forming conceptual foundations for modernizing state regulation, taking into account specifics of the Ukrainian banking system, European integration requirements, and wartime realities. The results can be used by NBU and other regulators to improve the regulatory framework for financial sector digitalization.
Downloads
References
Andriushchenko, I.S., & Skydan, V.L. (2023). Digital transformation of Ukraine’s banking sector. Business Inform, 12, 77–82. URL: https://www.business-inform.net/export_pdf/business-inform-2023-12_0-pages-77_82.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Bereslavska, O. (2024). Transformation of banking services in the context of digitalization. Economy and Society, 60. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-60-99 [in Ukrainian].
Kovalenko, M., & Sikalo, M. (2024). The role of digitalization in the development of public finance. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2(79), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2024-2-11 [in Ukrainian].
Naumenkova, S., & Mishchenko, S. (2020). Digital financial inclusion: Opportunities and limitations for Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Odessa National Economic University, (1–2), 133–149. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8582-6044 [in Ukrainian].
National Bank of Ukraine. (2025). Financial stability report. NBU. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/stability/report [in Ukrainian].
National Bank of Ukraine. (2025). Discussion begins on the procedure for organizing measures to ensure information security and cyber protection by financial service providers (updated). URL: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/startuye-obgovorennya-poryadku-organizatsiyi-zahodiv-iz-zabezpechennya-informatsiynoyi-bezpeki-ta-kiberzahistu-nadavachami-finansovih-poslug [in Ukrainian].
National Bank of Ukraine. (2022). Strategy of the National Bank of Ukraine until 2025. NBU. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/about/strategy/strategy2022 [in Ukrainian].
Reverchuk, S.K., & Tvorydlo, O.I. (2022). Features of development and state regulation of the banking services market of Ukraine in the context of digitalization. Economic Space, (179), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/179-2 [in Ukrainian].
Arner, D.W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R.P. (2016). The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47(4), 1271–1319. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2676553
Arner, D.W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R.P. (2017). FinTech and RegTech in a nutshell, and the future in a sandbox. CFA Institute Research Foundation, 3(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3088303
Boot, A., Hoffmann, P., Laeven, L., & Ratnovski, L. (2021). Fintech: What’s old, what’s new? Journal of Financial Stability, 53, 100836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100836
Carstens, A. (2021). Big tech in finance and new challenges for public policy. CGFS Papers No 68. Bank for International Settlements. URL: https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp181205.pdf
Deloitte. (2024). RegTech universe 2024. URL: https://www.deloitte.com/lu/en/Industries/technology/analysis/regtech-companies-compliance.html
European Central Bank. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence: Benefits and risks for financial stability. URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/fsr/special/html/ecb.fsrart202405_02~58c3ce5246.en.html
FATF. (2021). Cross-border payments: Survey results on implementation of the FATF standards. Financial Action Task Force. URL: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Cross-border-payments.html
Financial Conduct Authority. (2024). Annual report and accounts 2023-24. FCA. URL: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/annual-reports/annual-report-2023-24.pdf
International Monetary Fund. (2021). Powering the digital economy: Opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in finance. Departmental Paper No 2021/024. IMF. URL: https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/DP/2021/English/PDEORAIFEA.ashx
Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2022). FinTech regulatory sandbox guidelines. MAS. URL: https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/mas-media-library/development/regulatory-sandbox/sandbox/fintech-regulatory-sandbox-guidelines-jan-2022.pdf
OECD. (2022). Digital government review: Leveraging digital technologies for public financial management. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government-review-2022.pdf
OECD. (2023). Regulatory sandboxes in artificial intelligence. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/07/regulatory-sandboxes-in-artificial-intelligence_a44aae4f/8f80a0e6-en.pdf
Restoy, F. (2021). Fintech regulation: How to achieve a level playing field. Financial Stability Institute Occasional Paper, (17). Bank for International Settlements. URL: https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsipapers17.htm
Zetzsche, D.A., Arner, D.W., & Buckley, R.P. (2020). Decentralized finance (DeFi): Policy implications and regulatory challenges. Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa010
Zetzsche, D.A., Arner, D.W., Buckley, R.P., & Tang, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence in finance: Putting the human in the loop. CFTE Academic Paper Series: Centre for Finance. Technology and Entrepreneurship, (1), 1–25. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281749