Transformation of the multilevel governance model of social development under the influence of hybrid threats
Abstract
The article examines the transformation of the multilevel governance model of social development under the influence of contemporary hybrid threats. It is substantiated that hybrid threats, combining military, economic, informational, cyber, and diplomatic dimensions of influence, create specific challenges for traditional multilevel governance models, requiring their systemic transformation. It is established that the main directions of transformation cover the structural dimension (transition from hierarchical to network organizational forms, creation of specialized coordination structures, development of horizontal interaction between levels), the process dimension (acceleration of decision-making processes, implementation of operational response mechanisms, digitalization of information exchange), the functional dimension (redistribution of powers between levels, strengthening the coordination function of the national level, delegation of operational decisions to the local level), and the institutional dimension (formation of new rules of interaction, accountability mechanisms, control systems). It is revealed that transformation occurs through mechanisms of centralization of powers in the security sphere with simultaneous preservation of decentralization in the socio-economic sphere, creation of joint situational centers for coordinating actions of different levels of government, implementation of digital platforms for operational information exchange and coordination, development of public-private partnerships to mobilize resources of non-state actors. The features of transformation in wartime conditions are revealed using the example of Ukraine, particularly rapid reformatting of powers under martial law, development of horizontal cooperation between communities, integration of the volunteer movement into the management system, and digitalization of administrative processes. Recommendations are proposed for optimizing the multilevel governance model to counter hybrid threats through a balanced combination of centralization and decentralization, building coordination mechanisms between levels, digital transformation of governance systems, and engagement of non-state actors.
Downloads
References
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004). Multi-level Governance. Oxford University Press.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J., & Trondal, J. (2024). Robust Governance in Turbulent Times. Cambridge University Press.
Borch, O.J., & Heier, T. (Eds.). (2024). Preparing for Hybrid Threats to Security: Collaborative Preparedness and Response. Routledge.
Boin, A., & Lodge, M. (2016). Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management: A time for public administration. Public Administration, 94(2), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12264
D’Anieri, P. (2023). Ukraine and Russia: From Civilized Divorce to Uncivilized War. Cambridge University Press.
Faguet, J.P. (2014). Decentralization and Governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
Giest, S., & Roberge, I. (Eds.). (2025). The Routledge International Handbook of Public Administration and Digital Governance. Routledge.
Hoffman, F.G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649
Karatnycky, A. (2024). Battleground Ukraine: From Independence to the War with Russia. Yale University Press.
Kickert, W.J.M., Klijn, E.H., & Koppenjan, J.F.M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. SAGE Publications.
Plokhy, S. (2023). The Russo-Ukrainian War: The Return of History. Allen Lane.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
Schakel, A.H., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Multilevel governance and the state.
In S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J.D. Levy, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State (pp. 269–285). Oxford University Press.
Smoke, P. (2001). Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Concepts and Practice. UNRISD.
Torfing, J., Bentzen, T.O., Caponio, T., Coroado, S., Douglas, S., Nõmmik, S., Randma‐Liiv, T., Russo, C., Sørensen, E., & Verhoest, K. (2025). Advancing Robust Governance in Turbulent Times: The Role of Multi‐Level Governance, Hybrid Governance, and Negotiated Societal Intelligence. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70011
