Public Management of Sports Talent Development: From Traditional Theories to Digital Management Concepts

Keywords: public management, sports talents, digital transformation, tokenisation, blockchain, platform economy, digital asset information resource, management functions

Abstract

The article presents a systematic analysis of the evolution of theoretical concepts in public management of sports talent development from traditional bureaucratic models to contemporary digital management paradigms within the context of global digitalisation and socio-economic transformations. The author identifies a fundamental ontological contradiction between the nature of information (non-excludability, non-rivalry, immateriality) and traditional management instruments designed for physical objects, which generates exponential growth in digital infrastructure duplication costs without actual control over data. Through the lens of the ‘primary management lever’ criterion, eight traditional public management concepts are analysed (from Weberian bureaucracy to stakeholder theory), revealing their capabilities and structural limitations for managing sports ecosystems, as well as their digital adaptation potential. The transformative impact of four digital concepts (gamification, tokenisation, platform economy, metaverse) on five basic management functions (planning, organising, motivating, coordinating, controlling) is examined, demonstrating both synergistic effects and new forms of digital inequality and algorithmic discrimination. A solution to the ontological gap is proposed through the concept of ‘digital asset information resource’ as a hybrid object with a tripartite nature (primary asset → information resource → tokenized asset), which transfers control from the technically impossible data level to the cryptographically secured access level. Theoretical foundations for integrating traditional and digital approaches are substantiated through complex adaptive systems theory, actor-network theory, institutional logics theory, the socio-materiality concept, and value transformation theory, enabling the creation of a comprehensive conceptual framework for modernising public management of sports talents. The practical significance of the research lies in the possibility of developing a unique Ukrainian sports management model, where decentralisation becomes a competitive advantage through blockchain coordination, whilst wartime challenges are transformed into opportunities for diaspora engagement in young athletes’ investment through tokenisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andriy Boinik , Kharkiv Basketball Federation 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD student of the Department of economic policy and management of the Institute of Public Administration of the V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Director of the Project Support Department of Simcord LLC, Vice-President of the Kharkiv Basketball Federation

References

Distributed ledger token data. (2025, August 12). Bitbon System. URL: https://www.bitbon.space/ua/terms-and-definitions/digital-assets/distributed-ledger-token-data [in Ukrainian]

Kud, A.A. (2021). Comprehensive classification of virtual assets. International Journal of Education and Science, 4(3–4), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.26697/ijes.2021.3.6 [in Ukrainian]

Kud, A.A. (2024). The mechanism of tokenization of currency values for modernization of the national financial settlement infrastructure. Actual Problems of Public Administration, (1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2024-1-04 [In Ukrainian]

Balyi, I., Way, R., & Higgs, C. (2023). Long-term athlete development: Twenty years of Canadian implementation. International Sport Coaching Journal, 10(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2022-0098

Christensen, C.M. (2016). Competing against luck. HarperBusiness.

Côté, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 13(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.13.4.395

De Bosscher, V., Shibli, S., & Weber, A. C. (2019). Is prioritisation of funding in elite sport effective? An analysis of the investment strategies in 16 countries. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1505926

Ferkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2015). The stakeholder experience: An examination of governance in sport. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-20

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

García-del-Barrio, P., & Pujadas, F. (2022). Spanish football academies and youth development: Evidence from LaLiga’s academy licensing system. Soccer & Society, 23(6), 712–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2021.1976367

Geeraert, A., Alm, J., & Groll, M. (2022). A systematic review of governance principles in sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 22(5), 643–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2077795

Gohritz, A. (2024). Opportunistic behaviour of players’ agents in football and its monitoring by the players—An empirical analysis from the perspective of the players. Sport, Business and Management, 14(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-03-2023-0028

Green, A., Fleischman, D., Mulcahy, R., & Kean, B. (2024). Game changer-talent transfer pathways in sport: A systematic review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, Article 1401409.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1401409

Grix, J., & Phillpots, L. (2021). Revisiting the ‘governance narrative’: ‘Asymmetrical network governance’ and the deviant case of the German sport system. Public Administration, 99(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12626

Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.

Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2008). Comparative elite sport development: Systems, structures and public policy. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080554426

Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Lehtonen, K., & Uusikylä, P. (2021). How do networks reflect collaborative governance? The case of a sport policy program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), Article 7229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147229

Mendizabal, X., San-Jose, L., & García-Merino, J. D. (2022). Monetizing social value in sports clubs. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 560–579.

https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-09-2021-0107

Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.

OECD. (2024). Digital government index 2023: Enhancing the public sector’s digital transformation. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/01/2023-oecd-digital-government-index_b11e8e8e/1a89ed5e-en.pdf

Parent, M.M., & Harvey, J. (2019). A partnership-based evaluation of a voluntary sport organization’s program. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/

1080/16184742.2018.1447995

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.

Skille, E.Å., & Säfvenbom, R. (2021). Youth sport in Norway. In K. Green &

A. Smith (Eds.), Routledge handbook of youth sport (pp. 348–360). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795002

Stewart, B., Nicholson, M., Smith, A., & Westerbeek, H. (2018). Australian sport policy: Historical and contemporary perspectives. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1449895

Storm, R.K., Nielsen, K., & Thomsen, F. (2018). Can a small nation be competitive in the global sporting arms race? The case of Denmark. Managing Sport and Leisure, 23(4-6), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2018.1551781

Sysoyeva, L., & Martínez-Usarralde, M.-J. (2025). From security to digital governance in OECD: Evolution and some current considerations since the digital transformation. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 4, Article 256. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2025256

UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document. United Nations Development Programme. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/492551

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.

Willem, A., & Scheerder, J. (2022). The Dutch sports infrastructure: From fragmentation to integration. European Sport Management Quarterly, 22(4), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2020.1731385

Yamamoto, M.Y. (2023). Sport mega-events and public value creation: Analysis of Tokyo 2020 legacy governance. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 15(2), 287–305.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2189437

Zheng, J., & Mason, D.S. (2022). New media, digitalization, and the evolution of the professional sport industry. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, Article 921329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.921329

Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Boinik , A. (2025). Public Management of Sports Talent Development: From Traditional Theories to Digital Management Concepts. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2(67), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2025-2-02
Section
Theory and History of Public Administration