Landscape semiotics and visual / textual analysis in Anglo-American cultural geography
Abstract
The article focuse is on the landscape understanding from the perspective of semiotics and critical social theory in Anglo-American cultural geography and the method of landscape visual/textual analysis. The history of approaches to landscape understanding and research in Anglo-American cultural geography from the beginning of the XX century to this day is analyzed, as well as the consideration of the landscape in the European Landscape Convention. It was found that the use of the concept of landscape in human geography primarily implies the emphasis on the visual aspect of the built environment. It was found that from the perspective of semiotics, landscapes, in addition to the material (physical) dimension, carry a semantic load, convey meaning, are a system of signs and can be read as text.
The axioms for reading the landscape of American geographers P. Lewis and D. Mitchell, and ideas of structuralist semiotics are presented. These theoretical and methodological approaches are applied to study the architectural styles of administrative, residential and commercial buildings, monuments and advertisement in public space, place names and other ways of symbolic marking of space as well as landscapes representation in the media (movies, news, advertisements, paintings, literature). The article also examines the understanding of the landscape from the perspective of critical social theory, according to which they are involved in the construction, maintenance, legitimization and resіstence of social structures (systems of relations), such as national, political, economic, class or gender.
The approaches to landscape research discussed in the article are central to the analysis of visual changes of built environment in urban and rural settings, including the process of "decommunization" in Ukraine, landscape involvement in capitalist relations and consumption practices, it commodification and commercialization. It was found that landscapes visual/textual analysis also allows to reveal the values and identities of people expressed in the architectural styles of single-family houses. The application of the considered approaches is important for the improvement of urban planning and architectural regulations in order to create a socially just environment, taking into account the historical, social and cultural context, and the needs of different residents.
Downloads
References
Volovyk, V. (2013). Etnokulturni landshafty: regionalni struktury i pryrodokorystuvannya [Ethnocultural landscapes: regional structures and nature management]. Vinnytsia: «Vinnytsia City Printing House» [in Ukrainian].
Grodzynskyi, M. (2005). Piznannya landshaftu: mistse i prostir [Knowledge of the landscape: place and space]. Kyiv: Kyiv University Publishing and Printing Center [in Ukrainian].
Denysyk, H. (1998). Antropogenni landshafty Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy: monografiya [Anthropogenic landscapes of Right-Bank Ukraine: monograph]. Vinnytsia: Arbat [in Ukrainian].
Denysyk, H. (2014). Antropogenne landshaftoznavstvo: navch. posibnyk, Ch.1: Zahalne antropogenne landshaftoznavstvo [Anthropogenic Landscape Studies: Educ. handbook, Part 1: General Anthropogenic Landscape Studies]. Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia Regional Printing House [in Ukrainian].
Denysyk, H. (2015). Antropogenne landshaftoznavstvo: navch. posibnyk. Ch. 2. Regionalne antropogenne landshaftoznavstvo [Anthropogenic Landscape Studies: Educ. handbook. Part 2. Regional Anthropogenic Landscape Studies]. Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia Regional Printing House [in Ukrainian].
Kovalev, A. (2009). Landshaft sam po sebe y dlya cheloveka [The landscape it self and for the humans]. Kharkov: Burun Book. [in Russian].
Lozynskyi, R. (2020). Povsyakdenni landshafty prymiskykh sil Lvova: vizualnyi analiz postsotsialistychnykh transformatsiy [Everyday Landscapes of Peri-Urban Villages: a Visual Analysis of Postsocialist Transformations]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seria geografichna, 54. In print [in Ukrainian].
Tyutyunnik, Yu. (2019). Landshaft i landshaftnost. [Landscape and Landscapeness]. Kyiv [in Russian].
Evropeyska Landshaftna Konventsiya [European Landscape Convention]. (2000). Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_154 [in Ukrainian].
Duncan, J., & Duncan, N. (2010). Doing Landscape Interpretation. In D. DeLyser (Ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. (pp. 225-247). London, UK: SAGE.
Duncan, N., & Duncan, N. (2004). Landscapes of Privilege. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505755
Foote, K. E., & Azaryahu, M. (2009). Semiotics. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (pp. 89-94). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Groth, P. (1997). Frameworks for Cultural Landscape Study. In P. Groth. & T.W. Bressi (Eds.). Understanding Ordinary Landscapes. (pp. 1-21). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Groth, P., & Wilson, C. (2003). The Polyphony of Cultural Landscape Study: An Introduction. In C. Wilson, & P. Groth (Eds.). Everyday America: Cultural Landscape Studies after J.B. Jackson. (pp. 1-22). University of California Press.
Hoelscher, S. (2006). Cultural Landscape. In Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (pp. 75-78). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Hoelscher, S. (2009). Landscape Iconography. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (pp. 132-139). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kuhlke, O. (2006). Critical Human Geography. Encyclopedia of Human Geography. SAGE Publication. P. 66-68.
Lewis, P. (1979). Axioms for Reading the Landscape. In D. Meinig (Ed.). The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. (pp. 11-32). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lindström, K., Kull, K., & Palang, H. (2011). Semiotic study of landscapes: An overview from semiology to ecosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 39 (2/4), 12-36.
Lozynskyi, R. (2019). Rethinking the Role of Land Privatization in Peri-Urban Transformations in Ukraine: The case Study of Sokilnyky, Lviv oblast. Human Geography Journal, 27, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.26565/2076-1333-2019-27-06
Lukinbeal, C. (2009). Film. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (pp. 125-128). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mihăilescu, V. (2016). Reading a House. Migration, Households and Modernity in Post-communist Rural Romania. In R. Betea, & B. Wild (Eds.). Brave New World – Romanian Migrants’ Dream Houses. (pp. 48-57). Bucharest: Romanian Cultural Institute.
Meinig, D. (1979). Symbolic Landscapes. Some idealizations of American communities. In D. Meinig (Ed.). The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. (pp. 164-192). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, D. (2000). Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
Mitchell, D. (2008). New Axioms for Reading the Landscape: Paying Attention to Political Economy and Social Justice. In J., Wescoat, Jr., Johnston, & M. Douglas (Eds.), Political Economies of Landscape Change: Places of Integrative Power (pp. 29-50). Dordrecht: Springer.
Morin, K. (2009). Landscape Perception. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (pp. 140-145). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Norton, W. (2006). Cultural Geography: environments, landscapes, identities, inequalities. Oxford University Press.
Slyvka, R., Slyvka, L., & Atamaniuk, Y. (2017). Transformations of the cultural landscape of Donbas during the armed conflict 2015–2017. Studia z Geografii Politycznej i Historycznej, 6, 305-326. https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-0562.06.13
Winchester, H.P.M., & Rofe, M.W. (2010). Qualitative research and its place in human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.). Qualitative research methods in human geography. (pp. 3-25). Oxford University Press.
Wylie, J. (2009). Landscape. In The Dictionary of Human Geography. (5th. ed., pp. 409-411). Wiley-Blackwell.
Copyright (c) 2020 © Лозинський Р.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
