Optimising Adult Digital Learning Strategies in an Intensively Digitalising Society

Keywords: adaptation, digital competence, EEG, categorical approach, subjectivity, agency, adult education

Abstract

The article addresses the effective digital learning problem for adults under radical uncertainty conditions, accelerated digitalisation, and increasing demands for individual adaptation in the digital society. The study relevance  is grounded in the fact that for the so-called "digital immigrants" generation, engaging with new digital environments is frequently accompanied by technostress, cognitive overload, and a subjective control diminished sense. The aim of the article is to provide a theoretical foundation and empirical validation of effective digital learning strategies for adults, taking into account psychophysiological responses to digital novelty. The research methods included literature and psychophysiological experiment theoretical analysis using EEG monitoring, as well as latent profile, variance, regression, and mediation analyses. The study identified contemporary approaches to adult digital learning, namely andragogy, self-directed learning, microlearning, technology tutoring, and digital competence development. The significance of digital as the successful adaptation primary predictor of successful adaptation to new digital environments was empirically demonstrated. In accordance with four types of psychophysiological adaptation in adults and the stress-inducing factors associated with digital environments, the appropriateness of differentiated learning strategies was substantiated. A categorical approach to digital learning is proposed, understood as a shift from mastering individual applications to acquiring the functional digital environments groups logic; this approach contributes to reducing digital anxiety, enhancing digital subjectivity, and fostering the autonomy of the adult user. Strategic recommendations for effective digital learning among adults are provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karamushka, L. M. (2024). On the content and main components of psychological technologies. In Psykholoho-pedahohichnyi suprovid profesiinoi pidhotovky ta pidvyshchennia kvalifikatsii fakhivtsiv v umovakh voiennoho stanu (pp. 183–186). DZVO «UMO». http://umo.edu.ua/materiali-konferencij-nimp/khiii-mizhnarodnoji-naukovo-praktichnoji-konferenciji-22-travnja-2024-r-m-kijiv-psikhologho-pedaghoghichnij-suprovid-profesijnoji-pidghotovki-ta-pidvishhennja-kvalifikaciji-fakhivciv-v-umovakh-vojennogho-stanu [in Ukrainian]

Lutsenko, O., & Lysak, K. (2012). On the relationship between knowledge transfer and cognitive components of personality. Nauka i osvita, 6, 134–138. https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/journals/2012/NiO_6_2012/2/LutL.htm [in Ukrainian]

Ronzhes, O. Ye. (2025a). Psychological, psychophysiological and social adaptation of a person during the active transition to digital technologies. [Doctoral dissertation in psychology, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392763886_PhD_Thesis_Psihologicna_psihofiziologicna_ta_socialna_adaptacia_ludini_v_period_aktivnogo_perehodu_do_cifrovih_tehnologij_Psychological_psychophysiological_and_social_adaptation_of_a_person_during_the [in Ukrainian]

Ronzhes, O. Ye. (2025b). Profile identification based on experiment results. Research on adaptation to digitalisation. https://forms.gle/Qw8SyAMgWuAWaU4ZA [in Ukrainian]

Ronzhes, O. (2025). Subjecthood in digital space as an educational prerequisite for adaptation to digital technologies. In Nauka ta osvita v epokhu novykh vyklykiv ta mozhlyvostei (pp. 44–47). PE Lesiuk T.P. https://doi.org/10.64076/ihrc250618.04 [in Ukrainian]

Ronzhes, O. Ye., & Kriazh, I. V. (2025). Latent profiles of indicators of human adaptation to new digital environments. Problemy suchasnykh transformatsii. Seriia: pedahohika, 7. https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-9199-2025-7-10-03 [in Ukrainian]

Alanoglu, M., Karabatak, S., & Yang, H. (2025). Understanding university students’ self-directed online learning in the context of emergency remote teaching: The role of online learning readiness and digital literacy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09458-0

Aleandri, G. (2022). Adult education, education policies and lifelong learning during and beyond the covid19 pandemic. In 16th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.2358

Chai, M. T., Malik, A. S., Saad, M. N. M., & Rahman, M. A. (2021). Application of digital technologies, multimedia, and brain-based strategies. In Research anthology on adult education and the development of lifelong learners (pp. 837–860). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8598-6.ch042

Chee, S. Y. (2023). Age-related digital disparities, functional limitations, and social isolation: Unraveling the grey digital divide between baby boomers and the silent generation in senior living facilities. Aging & Mental Health, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2023.2233454

Clair, R. S. (2024). Andragogy: Past and present potential. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20546

College Success Plan. (2023). Digital distraction detox: 5 self-regulation strategies every student can use to beat screen-induced brain fog. https://collegesuccessplan.com/blog/digital-distraction-detox-5-selfregulation-strategies-every-student-can-use-to-beat-screeninduced-brain-fog

Curran, V., Gustafson, D. L., Simmons, K., Lannon, H., Wang, C., Garmsiri, M., Fleet, L., & Wetsch, L. (2019). Adult learners’ perceptions of self-directed learning and digital technology usage in continuing professional education: An update for the digital age. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 25(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971419827318

Cziesielski, M. J. (2020). Andragogy: The art of effectively teaching adults. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 29(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/lob.10358

Dienlin, T., & Johannes, N. (2020). The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/tdienlin

Ferreira, D., & Maclean, G. R. (2017). Andragogy in the 21st century: Applying the assumptions of adult learning online. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323388304_Andragogy_in_the_21st_century_Applying_the_Assumptions_of_Adult_Learning_Online

Fortuna, P. (2023). Positive cyberpsychology as a field of study of the well-being of people interacting with and via technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1053482

Garner, B., Els, A., & Snyder, T. (2025). Microlearning strategies: Engaging online adult learners. Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 4(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.69554/mrww4300

Greene, K., & Larsen, L. (2018). Virtual andragogy: A new paradigm for serving adult online learners. International Journal for Digital Society, 9(2), 1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2018.0169

Hamzah, S., Lin, N. M., Mat, N. H. C., Hamzah, N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). A study of motivation to learn online through the cognitive social learning theory. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(24), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.924ileiid0039

Lichtenthaler, U. (2025). From VUCA and BANI to a PUMO world: Why agile innovation is not enough. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877025500129

Limone, P., & Toto, G. A. (2022). Psychological and emotional effects of digital technology on digitods (14–18 years): A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938965

Luchinkina, I., & Klimenko, E. (2021). Psychological characteristics of adolescents with different levels of digital activity. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 10024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127310024

Lukashenko, I., & Lutsenko, O. (2016). Psychological aspects of learning in the virtual environment. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology, 60, 40–43. https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/journals/2012/NiO_6_2012/2/LutL.htm

Moll, I. (2023). A critique of andragogy in the South African TVET context. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v6i1.318

Morris, T. H., & Rohs, M. (2021). Digitization bolstering self-directed learning for information literate adults–A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100048

Petrushenko, Y., Onopriienko, K., Onopriienko, I., & Onopriienko, V. (2021). Digital learning for adults in the context of education market development. In 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT52158.2021.9548555

Roessger, K. M., Roumell, E. A., & Weese, J. (2020). Rethinking andragogical assumptions in the global age: How preferences for andragogical learning vary across people and cultures. Studies in Continuing Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1732335

Schiller, J. (2025). Transformative digital competences for ecosystems of lifelong learning. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714251406502

Shi, Y., Chen, M., Wei, Y., Shen, J., Wu, M., & Zhu, K. (2025). Understanding effects of engaging online learning environments on students’ cognitive engagement and well-being: The role of academic self-concept and flow. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1614109

Spivak, I., Mihus, I., & Greben, S. (2024). A comparative analysis of the digital competencies development in adult education. Pedagogy and Education Management Review, 2(16), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.36690/2733-2039-2024-2-18-27

Thigpen, T. S., Collier, C., Bryant, A., & Toles, B. (2024). The what and why of self-directed learning. In The playbook for self-directed learning (pp. 1–29). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003489894-1

Topolnyk, Y., Gurevych, R., Debenko, I., Klochok, O., Cherniakova, Z., Yarova, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2025). The impact of digital technologies and AI on adult learning: From digital literacy to neuroplasticity. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 16(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.70594/brain/16.2/11

Vannam, L., Bao, N. T., Hai, L. N., Thi, T. P. D., & Ngoc, M. H. (2025). Navigating digital distraction in learning: The role of technology, emotions, and classroom environment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 8(3), 1449–1462. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15123465

Published
2026-05-28
Cited
How to Cite
Ronzhes, O., & Lutsenko, O. (2026). Optimising Adult Digital Learning Strategies in an Intensively Digitalising Society. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology, (80), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2026-80-09