RESOLVING PEDAGOGICAL CONFLICTS IN THE CONTEXT OF SPIRAL DYNAMICS THEORY

Keywords: pedagogical conflict, interpersonal conflict, conflict situation, spiral dynamics theory, types of thinking, strategies for resolving pedagogical conflicts, values, communication

Abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2026-86-03

Purpose. To substantiate and define effective strategies for resolving pedagogical conflicts, based on the evolution of value systems and paradigms of thinking, which is the key to understanding each other.

Methods. Analysis of scientific literature, comparative-analytical method, generalization of pedagogical experience.

Results. The article analyzes how the evolution of value systems and paradigms of thinking of the individual occurs, according to the theory of spiral dynamics, in order to determine the maturity of the teacher's consciousness. Attention is focused on the fact that the resolution of pedagogical conflicts can occur within the framework of different paradigms of thinking, which determine the behavioral strategies of the participants. Typical strategies for resolving pedagogical conflicts are determined, according to the Thomas-Kilman model. The correspondence between the paradigms of thinking of the teacher and typical strategies for resolving pedagogical conflicts is revealed. At the same time, the main values, the reasons due to which conflict situations usually arise, typical strategies and methods for resolving pedagogical conflicts, which are usually used by the teacher with the corresponding type of thinking, are determined for each paradigm of thinking, and the results of applying the used strategy are outlined. It is determined that a teacher who thinks at the integrative level is able to combine existing differences between participants in the educational process into a holistic picture of reality, and accordingly flexibly use the elements of the required paradigm of thinking depending on the specific situation. The philosophical principles of an integrated approach to problem solving are also considered. The work emphasizes the importance of the teacher constantly developing the integrative type of thinking. Recommendations are offered to the teacher for its development. A real case of resolving a conflict situation with different types of thinking is considered.

Conclusions. According to the theory of spiral dynamics, the resolution of pedagogical conflicts can occur within the framework of different paradigms of thinking, which determine the behavioral strategies of the participants. These paradigms reflect different levels of maturity of consciousness, value systems, as well as specific actions and approaches of the teacher. To find a constructive way out of the conflict, the application of a conflict resolution strategy depends on the pedagogical situation itself and on the paradigm of thinking in which the teacher is. An effective teacher, in order to maintain an orientation to the value of the individual and a constructive result, must be able to think at an integrative level. Real pedagogical cases show that with an integrative type of thinking, the teacher uses the energy of the conflict for learning and structuring the educational space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berlach, A. I., Kondryukova, V. V., Kryvolapchuk, V. O.,

Polishchuk, O. G. (2010). Conflictology. Odesa: ODUVS. https://ru.scribd.com/document/612495844/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%8F (in Ukrainian).

Volkova, N. Р. (2019). Conflicts in the pedagogical staff of the institution of higher education: causes of occurrence and ways of prevention. Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 1(17), 113-123. https://pedpsy.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2019/1/16.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Voropaeva, T. S., Averyanova, N. M., Boyko, S. M. (2023). Integrative approach in the context of the development of modern Ukrainian studies. Collection of Scientific Papers «ΛΌГOΣ». V International Scientific and Practical Conference «Theoretical and empirical scientific research: concept and trends» June 23, 2023; Oxford, UK, 187-192. https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-23.06.2023.50 (in Ukrainian).

Durmanenko, E. A. (2004). Conflicts in the pedagogical environment: monograph. Lutsk: RVV "Vezha" Volyn. State University named after L. Ukrainka.

http://lpc-dspace.org.ua/handle/123456789/173 (in Ukrainian).

Karamushka, L. M., Dzyuba, T. M. (2009). Psychology of conflict management in organizations (based on the activities of educational organizations): monograph. K.: Poltava. http://dspace.pnpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/5248 (in Ukrainian).

Zhmai, A. V., Konoplia. O. I. (2019). Conflict behavior strategies: types, essence and relationship with emotional intelligence. Economics: time realities, 6(46), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3877552 (in Ukrainian).

Yitzhak Adizes. (2006). The Ideal Leader: Why You Can’t Become One, and What to Do About It: A New Management Paradigm. Kyiv: Publishing House “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=OZhADAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru%23v%3Donepage&q&f=false#v=onepage&q&f=false (in Ukrainian).

Lynev, K. O. (2017). Process oriented leadership of head of an educational institution in the context of spiral dynamics theory. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, (1 (4)). https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/20604/ (in Ukrainian).

Lisnievska , Y. (2024). Conflict prevention and settlement interests in the educational environment. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, 1(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-698X-2024-1-10 (in Ukrainian).

Pekar, V. (2016). Multicolored Management: The Evolution of Thinking, Leadership, and Management. 2nd ed., supplement. Kharkiv: Folio. https://knigogo.top/chitati-online/riznobarvnyj-menedzhment/ (in Ukrainian).

Usenko, D. (2025). Conflict management strategies in the educational environment: experience of modern pedagogy. Academic Notes. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 218, 252-257. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2025-1-218-252-257 (in Ukrainian).

Shepelenko, S. M. (2024). Spiral Dynamics of the Development of the Process of Intellectualization in the Context of Globalization Changes: Methodological Aspects. The Problems of Economy, 2, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2024-2-223-230 (in Ukrainian).

Beck, D. E., Cowan, C. (2005). Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values,

Leadership, and Change. New York, NY: Wiley/Blackwell. https://www.google.com.ua/books/edition/Spiral_Dynamics/w7PwBwAAQBAJ?hl=uk&gbpv=1&dq=inauthor:%22Don+Edward+Beck%22&printsec=frontcover

Gallifa, J. (2019). Integral Thinking and its Application to Integral Education. Journal of International Education and Practice, 2(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v2i1.603

Gallifa, J. (2018). The Tekhne-Logic Revolution. Rethinking the “Interobjective” Dimension of the Integral Theory. Consequences and Relevance to Education. Creative Education, 9(7), 1084-1104. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.97081

Helfrich, P. M. (2008). Ken Wilber’s AQAL Metatheory: An Overview. Castaic, CA: Wildfire Media. https://www.integralworld.net/helfrich.html

Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness. Brussels: Nelson Parker. https://www.socialskills4you.com/wp-content/Reinventingorganization.pdf

Murray, T. (2009). What Is the Integral in Integral Education? From Progressive

Pedagogy to Integral Pedagogy. Integral Review, 5(1), 96-134. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26627229_What_is_the_Integral_in_Integral_Education_From_Progressive_Pedagogy_to_Integral_Pedagogy

Wilber, K. (2005). Introduction to Integral Theory and Practice IOS Basic and the AQAL map.

AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1, 1-38. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2302988

Published
2026-05-31