PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF A THEORETICAL MODEL FOR THE INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Abstract
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2026-86-01
The purpose. This work aims to develop the philosophical and methodological foundations for integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into educational research, which includes: establishing the philosophical basis for integrating AI into the research process; defining the terminology; identifying the methodological principles that ensure the appropriate use of AI in research practices; justifying the role of AI as the researcher’s analytical partner.
Research methods. The study employed a range of methods tailored to its objectives: an analysis of previous fundamental works in philosophy and research methodology, as well as research on the integration of AI into education and scientific research; philosophical-ontological, conceptual and hermeneutic analysis, conceptual-categorical analysis, content analysis, systematisation, conceptualisation and classification, methodological analysis, as well as inductive, deductive, linguistic and cognitive-conceptual methods.
As a result, the study highlights the philosophical foundations of integrating AI into the research process, which include the following concepts and theories: the theory of knowledge (epistemology), concepts regarding the nature of being, social philosophy, ethical theories (theory of moral duty, virtue ethics), theory of technology adoption in education, phenomenology and theories of AI and general AI, as well as theoretical approaches to academic integrity. The integration of AI into educational research is based on the principles of ethics and academic integrity, human control (human-centredness), data privacy and security, avoidance of algorithmic bias, accountability and transparency. Based on a comprehensive analysis of scientific sources, regulatory documents, international standards and contemporary research publications describing the integration of AI into education, this study has developed a terminological framework for the integration of AI into educational research. It contains an overarching concept (“Integration of AI into the research process”), basic concepts, and concepts grouped into three categories: those describing mechanisms for ensuring the validity and verification of results obtained using AI; those describing the evaluation of the effectiveness of using various AI tools at different stages of research; and those presenting the procedure for the phased integration of AI at various levels of scientific activity. Methodological approaches have been identified that ensure the operationalisation of the terminological system in research practice (systemic, synergistic, phenomenological, personal, holistic), and methodological principles that ensure the correct use of AI in research practices (objectivity, determinism, development, unity of theory, experiment and practice, informativeness, cognitive). The role of AI as an analytical partner to the researcher, capable of enhancing cognitive processes and analytics whilst maintaining the leading role of humans in decision-making, is substantiated.
Conclusions. The philosophical and methodological foundations for integrating AI into educational research are based on a combination of fundamental philosophical categories (concepts, theories, approaches, principles) and contemporary methodological approaches and principles, ensuring a holistic approach and the ethical, evidence-based and conceptually sound use of AI in scientific inquiry.
Downloads
References
Alto, V. (2023). Modern generative AI with ChatGPT and OpenAI models: Leverage the capabilities of OpenAI’s LLM for productivity and innovation with GPT 3 and GPT 4. Birmingham: Packt Publishing, Limited. https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Generative-ChatGPT-OpenAI-Models/dp/1805123335#
Ari, A. O., Ozioko, N. J., Yunusa, A. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence on philosophy of teacher education for sustainable development. Journal of Educational Foundations, 14(Special Edition), 76–84. https://jef.unn.edu.ng/wp-content/uploads/sites/341/2025/09/JEF-VOL-14-ISSUE-3-2025-009-ARI.pdf
Arstorp, A.-T., Lund, A. (2025). An ontological turn: being and becoming with digital technologies in education. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2572384. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2572384
Battaglia, F. A. (2026). Tale of Two Anthropocentric Abstractions: On the Concept of the “Human” in AI and Environmental Ethics. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10355-5
Bisenbaev, A. K. (2026). Scientific Artificial Intelligence: From a Procedural Toolkit to Cognitive Coauthorship. Philosophies, 11(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11010012
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Flores-Bueno, D., Gómez-Puente, S. M., Vite-León, V. O. (2024). AI in higher education: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391485
Chaaban, Y. (2025). Exploring research ethics through the lens of critical posthumanism in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(7), 1740–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2465995
Cruz-Aguilar, M.A. (2025). The epistemic revolution of AI: reconfiguring the foundations of scientific knowledge. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02658-3
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Comprehensive Academic Integrity (CAI): An ethical framework for educational contexts. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_194-1
Fitterer, R. J. (2008). Love and Objectivity in Virtue Ethics: Aristotle, Lonergan, and Nussbaum on Emotions and Moral Insight. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442688520
Floris, F. D., Renandya, W. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence tools for research writing: Practical tips for teachers. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28113int2
Joachimiak, M. P., Miller, M. A., Caufield, J. H., et al. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Ontology: LLM-Assisted Construction of AI Concept Hierarchies. Applied Ontology, 19(4), 408-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/15705838241304103
Jose, B., Cleetus, A., Joseph, B., Joseph, L., Jose, B., John A. K. (2025). Epistemic authority and generative AI in learning spaces: rethinking knowledge in the algorithmic age. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1647687
Kant, I. (1991). The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic
of Morals. Psychology Press, 142 p. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/The_Moral_Law.html?id=ryfk_Xt1wdgC&redir_esc=y
Karpouzis, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Ethical considerations and insights from ancient Greek philosophy. In Proceedings of the 13th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SETN ’24) (Article 57, pp. 1–7). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3688671.3688772
Kotikalapudi, K.B., Gayatri, S.N. (2026). Artificial intelligence in education an educational perspective on personalization equity and ethics. Discover Education, 5, Article number 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01226-1
OECD. (2007). OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264034020-en-fr
Osadcha, K., Shumeiko, N., Spišiaková, M. (2025). AI-based solution and J. Dewey’s philosophy in training IT students. Advanced Education, 19(27), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.324073 (In Ukainian).
Petrescu, I.E., Gole, I., Balu, F.O., Sabie, O.M. (2025). The Role of AI Tools in Increasing the Efficiency of Research and Teaching. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 19(1), 656-663. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0052
Popova, L. (2024). The Phenomenon of “Artificial Intelligence” in the Formation of Transversal Competencies of the Future Teacher: Pros and Cons. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.1.86-93 (In Ukrainian).
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K., Karkee, M. (2025). AI agents vs. agentic AI: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10468
Shapiro, S. C., Eckroth, D. (1987). Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/robotica/article/abs/encyclopedia-of-artificial-intelligence-edited-by-stuart-c-shapiro-and-david-eckroth-j-wiley-and-sons-new-york-chichester-etc-two-volumes-xxi-1219-pp-index-1987-14250/FD52D1EB51B7ACE0295A170E2A592BDE
Storozhyk, M. (2024). Philosophy of future: analytical overview of interaction between education, science, and artificial intelligence in the context of contemporary challenges. Futurity Philosophy, 3(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2024.03.30.02 (In Ukrainian).
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. 44 p. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Venkatesh, V., Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wickramasinghe, M., Gunawardena, L., Padukkage, A. (2026). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education: a meta-review approach. AI and Ethics, 6, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00878-3
Williamson, B. (2024). The Social life of AI in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00342-5
Varypaiev, O. (2025). Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence: The Deconstruction of the Subject and a New Ontology of Cognition. Bulletin of the Humanities, (7). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15525177 (In Ukrainian).
Verbytskyi, V. V. (2020). Organising research activities for upper secondary school pupils. In Current challenges facing educational institutions in the context of shaping pupils’ life prospects: Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference (Part 1, pp. 32–39). Kremenchuk. https://студенти.kiev.ua/2021/01/21всеукраїнська-науково-практична-кон-2/ (In Ukrainian).
Dzioban, O. P. (2025). Methodology, organization and technology of scientific research. Feniks. https://ippi.org.ua/sites/default/files/metodologiya_2025.pdf (In Ukrainian).
Ziaziun, I. A. (2008). Philosophy of pedagogical action. Publishing
department Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/4482/1/%D0%A4%D1%96%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%97_%D0%B4%D1%96%D1%971.pdf (In Ukrainian).
Kovtun, N. (2024). Methodology of scientific research. Zhytomyr. https://eprints.zu.edu.ua/39719/7/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%82%D1%83%D0%BD%20%D0%9D_%20%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%87_%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B4_%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B1_%20%D0%9C%D0%9D%D0%94_24.pdf (In Ukrainian).
Kolomiiets, A., Kolomiiets, D., Kushnir, O. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on the philosophy of education and pedagogical science. Scientific Issues of Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. Section: Pedagogics and Psychology, 84, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.31652/2415-7872-2025-84-7-13 (In Ukrainian).
Kremen, V., Spirin, O. (2024). The role of NAES of Ukraine in the digital transformation of education and science. Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2024.6228 (In Ukrainian).
Lystopad, O. A. (2012). Methodological principles of studying the formation and development of the pedagogy of creativity as a science. Scientific Bulletin of the K. D. Ushynsky South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University, 5–6, 176–184. (In Ukrainian).
Mazurina, Y., Pavlenko, N., Stepova, Y. (2022). Linguistic terminology as a special system of terminology. Scientific Bulletin of the K. D. Ushynsky South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University: Linguistic Sciences, 35, 80-91. http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16826 (In Ukrainian).
Horyn, V. P. (Ed.). (2023). Methodology of scientific research: A textbook. FOP Osadtsa Yu. V. https://api.dspace.wunu.edu.ua/api/core/bitstreams/1bcf27ff-03bd-44fa-953a-3ea9bfb22d0f/content (In Ukrainian).
Osadchyi, V.V., Osadcha, K. P. (2024). The use of Microsoft Copilot in
higher education and research. IDE NAES Ukraine. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/743248/1/Osadchyi%20V%20%26%20Osadcha%20K%20Using%20Microsoft%20Copilot%20Chat%20in%20education%20and%20science_doi.pdf (In Ukrainian).
Pinchuk, O., Malytska, I. (2024). Responsibile and ethical use of artificial intelligence in research and publising. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 100(2), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v100i2.5676 (In Ukrainian).
Spirin, O. M. (2004). The Beginnings of Artificial Intelligence. Zhytomyr: Published by ZhDU. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/458/1/Spirin_Pochatky_shtuchnogo_intelektu.pdf
Surmin, Yu. P. (2006). The scientist’s workshop. Training and Publishing Centre
“Konsortsium z udoskonalennia menedzhment-osvity v Ukraini”. http://catalog.puet.edu.ua/opacunicode/index.php?url=/notices/index/IdNotice:169654/Source:default (In Ukrainian).
Filipenko, L. V., Dumanskyi, O. V., Kozak, O. V. (2023). Academic integrity in the scientific and educational environment of educational institutions of Ukraine: a view through the prism of the presence of artificial intelligence. Academic visions, 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7966703 https://www.academy-vision.org/index.php/av/article/view/380 (In Ukrainian).
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, The H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy. (2002). Philosophical Encyclopaedic Dictionary. Abrys. https://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/ukr0011096