The cultural and linguistic environment as an object of public administration in the context of socio-cultural change: theoretical foundations of the study

Keywords: cultural-linguistic environment, sociocultural transformations, language identity, intercultural dialogue, language policy, cultural identity, linguistic diversity

Abstract

The article presents the theoretical foundations for studying the cultural and linguistic environment as an object of public administration in the context of socio-cultural transformations. It analyzes the conceptual and categorical framework that defines the cultural and linguistic environment as a component of the socio-cultural system, which serves as the foundation for communicative interaction, individual socialization, and the reproduction of cultural norms and values within society. The study examines the influence of the cultural and linguistic environment on socio-cultural transformations in Ukraine amid globalization challenges and European integration. Key theoretical approaches and contributions of prominent scholars–such as E. Tylor, P. Bourdieu, and J. Habermas–are considered, highlighting the multidimensional nature of culture and the role of language in shaping social identity and communication.

The research establishes that the cultural and linguistic environment reflects societal processes and actively contributes to the formation of new models of civic identity, political culture, educational systems, and media practices. A multi-level structure of the cultural and linguistic environment is proposed, encompassing individual, group, and institutional levels. The institutional level captures the influence of governmental, educational, cultural, and media institutions, which shape policies aimed at preserving and developing linguistic and cultural diversity. The group level reflects the interactions of social communities, ethnic and linguistic groups, where intercultural dialogue occurs and collective identity is constructed. At the individual level, the cultural and linguistic environment shapes processes of self-identification, worldview formation, and linguistic identity.

The article substantiates mechanisms of public influence on socio-cultural transformations, with a central role played by language policy, educational programs, media spaces, and legal regulation of cultural activity. These mechanisms help preserve cultural uniqueness while promoting adaptation to new societal challenges and integration into the European socio-cultural space. The need for a balanced approach between preserving national cultural heritage and openness to intercultural dialogue is emphasized, as it is essential for Ukraine's adaptation to European value-normative standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleksandra Tarasenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Postgraduate student of the Department of Regional Policy, Educational and Scientific, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

References

Tylor, E.B. (1871). Primitive Culture. Researches into the Development of Mythology. Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/

/pg70458-images.html

Schwimmer, B. (1980). A History of Theory in Cultural Anthropology Prior to 1980. Ethnology, Ethnography and Cultural Anthropology. URL: https://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/C04/E6-20D-68-03.pdf

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press. URL: https://www.mit.edu/~allanmc/bourdieu1.pdf

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press. URL: https://teddykw2.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/jurgen-habermas-theory-of-communicative-action-volume-1.pdf

Kroeber, A. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. URL: https://peabody.harvard.edu/publications/culture-critical-review-concepts-and-definitions

Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. URL: https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf

European Council (1958). Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community, P. 385–386. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/

/1(1)/oj/eng

Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language and Linguistics. URL: https://philpapers.org/archive/BLOLAO.pdf

Boroch, R. (2016). A formal concept of culture in the classification of Alfred L. Kroeber and Clyde Kluckhohn. URL: https://philarchive.org/archive/ROBAFC-5

Meyerowitz, J. (2010). How Common Culture Shapes the Separate Lives: Sexuality, Race, and Mid-Twentieth-Century Social Constructionist Thought. The Journal of American History, vol. 96, no. 4, 1057-1084. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40661825

Milroy, L. (1982), “Language and Social Networks”, Linguistic Society of America,

vol. 58, no. 1, 231–233. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/413545

European Commission (2021), Cohesion Policy Legislative Framework 2021-2027. URL: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/2021-2027-EU-allocations-available-for-programming/2w8s-ci3y/

Published
2025-06-04
Section
Theory and Philosophy of Public Administration