Theoretical foundations of international technical assistance in the context of government-civil society interaction
Abstract
This article explores the theoretical foundations of international technical assistance (ITA) in the context of interaction between public authorities and civil society institutions amid Ukraine’s European integration and post-war recovery. It traces the evolution of the ITA concept from the paternalistic “donor-recipient” model to the modern partnership-for-development paradigm. The article analyzes the transformation of civil society organizations (CSOs) from peripheral actors into full-fledged agents of change within the ITA system. Conceptual models of CSO participation are systematized, including hierarchical, networked, hybrid, and adaptive models. Theoretical foundations for state-civil society interaction are justified through the lens of governance theories, collaborative management, public service co-production, and social capital. A comparative analysis is conducted on European, Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, and Eastern European models of CSO involvement in ITA. The author proposes an original theoretical model of CSO participation in Ukraine’s ITA system based on principles of network governance, adaptive systems, and multilevel coordination. The model incorporates a coordination core, sectoral platforms, regional hubs, and digital infrastructure. The article outlines conditions for the model’s implementation and identifies performance indicators at the impact, outcome, and process levels.
Downloads
References
Civil society of Ukraine: promotion and engagement policy, challenges and transformations. Analytical report. Kyiv: NISD, 2019. 112 p. [in Ukrainian].
Kornievsky, O.A. (2020). Civil society in the context of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic: challenges and prospects for development. Strategic priorities, no. 3-4 (56), 98–104. [in Ukrainian].
Vinnikov, O.Yu. (2012). Indicators of civil society development in Ukraine. Kyiv: UNCIPR, 80 p. [in Ukrainian].
On approval of the Procedure for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of state regional policy: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated 21.10.2015 No. 856. (2015). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/856-2015-п [in Ukrainian].
On the Coordination Council for Promoting the Development of Civil Society: Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 04.11.2016 No. 487/2016. (2016). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/487/2016 [in Ukrainian].
On promoting the development of civil society in Ukraine: National Strategy. Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 26.02.2016 No. 68/2016. (2016). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/68/2016 [in Ukrainian].
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M. (2017). Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 288 p.
Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, 543–571.
Bache, I., Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 252 p.
Biekart, K., Fowler, A. (2018). Ownership Dynamics in Local Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives. Third World Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 9, 1692–1710.
Börzel, T.A., Risse, T. (2000). When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration online Papers, vol. 4, no. 15, 1–24.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 556 p.
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. London: Longman, 246 p.
Fowler, A. (2000). The Virtuous Spiral: A Guide to Sustainability for NGOs in International Development. London: Earthscan, 225 p.
Lewis, D., Kanji N. (2009). Non-Governmental Organizations and Development. London: Routledge, 242 p.
Ménard, C. (2004). The Economics of Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 160, no. 3, 345–376.
Najam, A. (2000). The Four C's of Government Third Sector-Government Relations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 10, no. 4, 375–396.
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159 p.
OECD. Accra Agenda for Action. Accra: OECD Publishing, 2008. 8 p.
OECD. DAC Recommendation on the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. 12 p.
OECD. (2005). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD Publishing, 12 p.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development, vol. 24, no. 6, 1073–1087.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 541 p.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press, 248 p.
Rostow, W.W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179 p.
Salamon, L.M., Anheier, H.K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 528 p.
Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 256 p.
SIDA. (2019). Guidelines for Support to Civil Society. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 48 p.
UNISDR. (2017). Build Back Better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. Geneva: United Nations, 48 p.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 336 p.
