Comparative analysis of risk management practices in the public sector of different countries: lessons for Ukraine in cooperation with international financial institutions

  • Glib Butenko Education and Research Institute of Public Administration of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4583-3240
Keywords: risk management, public sector, international experience, institutional model, strategic planning

Abstract

The article explores the specific features of risk management in the public sector across various countries and identifies useful practices for Ukraine in the context of cooperation with international financial institutions. The aim of the article is to outline directions for improving public governance in Ukraine by analyzing risk management practices in the public sector of other countries. The study employed general scientific methods of cognition: comparative analysis; systematization; generalization; induction; deduction; and a structural-functional approach. The research results indicate that in the USA, the United Kingdom, Poland, and Bulgaria, the institutionalization of risk management is achieved through the development of a regulatory framework; appointment of responsible individuals; establishment of coordination bodies; and implementation of independent oversight. In the USA and the UK, risk management follows a clear vertical structure of responsibility at the level of departments and agencies, which ensures transparency and effective decision-making. In Poland and Bulgaria, ministries of finance play a central role in coordinating methodological support, although both countries face challenges in practical implementation and human resources. It has been found that the effectiveness of these models largely depends on institutional stability, political support, and regulatory alignment. Countries with mature organizational systems demonstrate the integration of risk management into strategic planning, budget processes, and project management. In the USA, so-called “risk constitutions” are used to regulate the operations of public agencies with a focus on risk. In the UK, effective risk management is ensured through the work of risk committees and the systematic efforts of Accounting Officers. The practical value of this study lies in offering recommendations for building a risk management system in Ukraine based on the adaptation of successful international practices while taking into account the requirements of donor organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Glib Butenko, Education and Research Institute of Public Administration of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Law, National Security and European Integration, Educational and Scientific Institute «Institute of Public Administration», V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

References

Hrechaniichenko, O.O. (2020). The essence and peculiarities of applying a risk-oriented approach in public administration. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 23, 25–29. URL: http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/23_2020/25.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Ostrovskyi, I.A., & Yukhnov, B.Yu. (2020). International experience of risk management in the implementation of local investment projects. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Ekonomika i upravlinnia, 2, 70–2. URL: https://doi.org/10.32838/2523-4803/70-2-5

[in Ukrainian].

Ukraine’s cooperation with international financial institutions. URL: https://mfa.gov.ua/mizhnarodni-vidnosini/spivrobitnictvo-ukrayini-z-mizhnarodnimi-finansovimi-instituciyami [in Ukrainian].

The government approved the roadmap for reforming public investment management. URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/uriad-skhvalyv-dorozhniu-kartu-reformuvannia-upravlinnia-publichnymy-investytsiiamy [in Ukrainian].

Braig, S., Gebre, B., & Sellgren, A. (2011). Strengthening risk management in the US public sector (№28). McKinsey & Company. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/dotcom/client_service/risk/working%20papers/28_wp_risk_management_in_the_us_public_sector.ashx

National Audit Office. (2011). Managing risks in government. URL: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/managing_risks_in_government.pdf

Mormul, K. (2021). Risk management in the management control system in Polish local government units: Assumptions and practice. Risks, 9(5), 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050092

Parashkevova, E. (2020). Integrating project risk into risk management strategies in public sector organizations. IJASOS – International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 16. URL: http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org/en/download/article-file/1260234

Parashkevova-Velikova, E., & Bogdanova, M. (2025). 7-S challenges in public sector risk management. Environment. Technology. Resources, 16, 425–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8655

U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2025). Financial Services Sector Risk Management Plan. URL: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/216/Financial-Services-Sector-Risk-Management-Plan.pdf

Published
2025-06-04
Section
World Experience of Public Administration: Theory and Practice