Post-communist transformation in the Republic of Poland: achievements, problems, interpretation

Keywords: post-communist transformation, Republic of Poland, achievements; problems, assessments

Abstract

The article analyzes the post-communist transformation in the Republic of Poland. The author notes the complexity of the concept of "post-communist transformation", interpreting it as a systemic multifaceted social process, the success of which depends on the dynamics and use of external and internal, national factors.

The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics and level of completion of post-communist transformation in the Republic of Poland.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in the statement of the possibility of applying to Poland the provisions on the variability of post-communist reforms and the slowdown of transformation. The assessment of transformation by Polish politicians and scholars is systematized and generalized.

The hypothesis of the study is based on the thesis of the variability of post-communist reforms due to global and national factors, the influence of civil society and the impact on reforms of the requirements for membership in the European Union.

Conclusions. The Republic of Poland is a positive example of successful post-communist reforms, which, in particular, is manifested in democratization, the formation of an efficient economy, the Europeanization of all aspects of public life and membership in the European Union and NATO. The complex problems of post-communist transformation have been adequately reflected in Poland in theoretical discussions, which are constantly turning into political debates and reflect the struggle of two main approaches to reform: neoliberal and pragmatic.

Understanding of the peculiarities of post-communist transformation in Poland is impossible without a historical digression. In our opinion, significant elements of a market economy and the availability of private property in agriculture and handicrafts were a significant advantage of Poland. The foundations of the success of post-communist transformation were laid in the 1980s, which became a political school for the opposition and contributed to the formation of civil society, and significant economic problems and the government's inability to solve them led to a public demand for change, and the new government received a credit of public confidence for unpopular economic reforms.

Shock therapy was a combination of radical economic reforms with similarly dramatic political changes. It had a revolutionary character, laying the foundation for a change in production relations and became a necessary impetus for subsequent changes. Unlike in Ukraine, the oligarchy has not been formed in Poland, public administration (public authorities and local self-government bodies) and civil society have proved to be much more effective, and scientific proposals have been in demand. The clear prospect of membership in the European Union since 1994 has proved to be a necessary core for further transformations: the pro-European vector has remained a real direction of development in all changes of government.

Crucial to the success of post-communist transformation were society's commitment to change, which ensured the continuity of reforms in the change of power while adjusting for social and economic and political needs. The scholars' critical approach to the issue of reforms and the discussion of their tactics contributed to this process.

The issue of the decelerated transformation, which is typical for Ukraine and possibly manifested in Poland since 2015, remains the subject of discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mykola Lakhyzha , Institute for Personal Training of the State Employment Service of Ukraine, Kyiv

Doctor of Public Administration, Professor, Professor of Public Administration Department, Institute for Personal Training of the State Employment Service of Ukraine, Kyiv

References

Kolodko, H. (2010). Velykaia transformatsyia [Great transformation]. Vek hlobalyzatsyy, 2, 68–77 [in Polisch].

Blok, Z. (2006). Transformacja jako konwersja funkcji wewnątrzsystemowych na przykładzie Polski [Transformation as a conversion of intra-system functions on the example of Poland]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM [in Polisch].

Maimurek, Yа. Shcho politychna kryza v Polshchi oznachaie dlia Yevropy? [What is the political crisis in the Polish language for Europe?]. URL: https://politkrytyka.org/ 2016/03/16/rozmova-z-yakubom-majmurekom-shho-politichna-kriza-v-polshhi-oznachaye-dlya-yevropi-sereda-19-bereznya-2016-18-00/ [in Ukrainian].

Kolasa-Nowak, A. (2012). Transformacja systemowa w interpretacjach polskich socjologów. Tworzenie wiedzy w warunkach zmiany społecznej [System transformation in interpretations of Polish sociologists. Creating knowledge in the conditions of social change]. PRINCIPIA LVI, 65–82. URL: https://search.proquest.com/openview/ a8039b25075f64670426bd9327285341/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1356356 [in Polisch].

Shtompka, P. (2007). Sotsyolohyia sotsyalnykh yzmenenyi : monohrafyia [Sociology of social change]. Moscow: Dyrekt-Medya [in Russian].

Barańskij M.Wiśniewskij J. (2014). 25 lat transformacji w krajach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej [25 years of transformation in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe]. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego [in Polisch]

Lakhyzha, M.I. (2009). Modernizatsiia publichnoi administratsii: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty [Modernization of public administration: theoretical and practical aspects]. Poltava: RVV PUSKU [in Ukrainian].

Lakhyzha, M.I. (2012). Modernizatsiia publichnoi administratsii: dosvid Respubliky Polshcha [Modernization of public administration: the experience of the Republic of Poland]. Poltava: PoltNTU [in Ukrainian].

Beletskyi, Ya. (2020). Piat prychyn, chomu Polshchi vdalosia [Five reasons why Poland succeeded]. URL: https://nv.ua/ukr/opinion/reformi-v-polshchi-p-yat-rechey-yaki-mayut-znachennya-dlya-ekonomiki-ostanni-novini-50081198.html [in Ukrainian].

Rudakiewicz, N. (2019). Demokratyczna transformacja w Polsce i na Ukrainie w świetle współczesnej tranzytologii: analiza porównawcza [Democratic transformation in Poland and Ukraine in the light of modern transitology: comparative analysis]. Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis, 25 [in Polisch]

Shtompka, P. (2001). Sotsyalnoe izmenenie kak travma: (statia pervaia) [Social change as trauma: (article one)]. Sotsyolohycheskye yssledovanyia [in Russian].

Shtompka, P. (2001). Kulturnaia travma v postkommunystycheskom obshchestve: (statia vtoraia) [Cultural trauma in a post-communist society: (second article). Sotsyolohycheskye issledovanyia, 2 [in Russian]

Cherniak, D.S. (2006). Kontseptsiia sotsialnykh zmin Petra Shtompky: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi potentsial [Petro Shtompka's concept of social change: theoretical and methodological potential]. Candidate’s thesis [in Ukrainian].

Baltserovych, L. (2000). Sotsializm, kapitalizm, peretvorennia [Socialism, capitalism, transformation]. Kharkiv: Karavela [in Ukrainian].

Bzhezynskyi, Z. (1995). Stadii postkomunistychnykh peretvoren. Politolohiia postkomunizmu. Politychnyi analiz postkomunistychnykh suspilstv [Stages of post-communist transformations. Political science of postcommunism. Political analysis of post-communist societies]. Kyiv: Politychna dumka [in Ukraian].

Kolodko H. (2014). Reformi – instrument, a ne samotsel. Byznes, 39 [in Russian].

Kieżun, W.C. (2012). Patologia transformacji [Pathology of transformation]. Warszawa: Wydanie uzupełnione [in Polisch].

Wos, R. (2013). Kieżun: Polska Afryką Europy. Transformacja była klasyczną neokolonizacją [Kiezun: Poland is the Africa of Europe. Transformation was a classic neocolonization]. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. 8 listopada URL: https://forsal.pl/artykuly/744722,kiezun-polska-afryka-europy-transformacja-byla-klasyczna-neokolonizacja.html [in Polisch].

Wos, R. (2015). Nasza hekatomba roku 1990, czyli jak powstalo bezrobotcie [Our hecatomba of 1990, or how unemployment arose]. Gazeta Prawna. 6.03 [in Polisch].

Kasprowicz, T. (2015). Hekatombą był komunizm, nie transformacja. [Hecatomb was communism, not transformation]. Respublica. URL: https://publica.pl/teksty/hekatomba-byl-komunizm-nie-transformacja-50413.html [in Polisch].

Zieliński, M. (2017). Wokół “Patologii transformacji” Witolda Kieżuna – uwagi krytyczne [Around “Pathology of transformation” by Witold Kieżun - critical remarks]. Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review 23/2 Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. URL: https://mises.pl/blog/2017/07/05/zielinski-wokol-patologii-transformacji-witolda-kiezuna-uwagi-krytyczne[in Polisch]/

Kolodko, H. Velykaia polskaia transformatsyia: uroky dlia razvyvaiushchykhsia rynkov [The Great Polish Transformation: Lessons for Emerging Markets]. URL: https://www.tiger.edu.pl/aktualnosci/mir.0306.pdf [in Russian].

Noga, M, Stawicka, M.K. (2009). Rynek pracy w Polsce w dobie integracji europejskiej i globalizacji [The labor market in Poland in the age of European integration and globalization]. Warszawa [in Polisch].

Rotar, N. (2011). Osoblyvosti politychnoi kultury yak chynnyk rozvytku politychnoi systemy Polshchi [Features of political culture as a factor in the development of the Polish political system]. Studia politologica Ucraino-Polona [in Ukrainian].

Chy warto bylo zmieniac ustroj? Spolesna ocean przemian po 1989 roku [Would it be worth changing the system? A painful ocean of change after 1989]. (2013). Centrum Badania Opinii Spolecznej. Warszawa [in Polisch].

Published
2020-06-30
Section
World Experience of Public Administration: Theory and Practice