New Application of the ‘Core-Periphery Concept’ in Determining Local Development Strategy for Post-War Ukraine’s Recovery
Abstract
The success of regional development practices largely depends on the applicability of relevant foundational theories. A common approach to determining the theoretical basis for development programs is the application of the «core-periphery» concept. This concept is based on the thesis that in a spatial system, one can distinguish a core of development characterized by dynamic, competitive, and market-integrated production, and peripheral areas that are in a state of stagnation. According to this concept, the appropriate development strategy should focus on supporting those areas (the core) that have the necessary potential for growth.
Taking into account the specifics of post-war recovery in Ukraine, building a development plan based on the «core-periphery» concept should include the following stages: identifying the differences in economic development levels of various territories; initiating the process of concentration based on regional centers to create dominant cores that will become growth poles; developing interactions between the elements of the «core-periphery» model based on innovation and the integration of Ukraine into the global market; and further developing the elements of the «core-periphery» model that potentially reduce spatial inequality for the periphery.
The study shows that when applying the «core-periphery» model to Ukraine, it will be advisable initially to focus on replicating proven solutions, thus avoiding the costs associated with striving to find unique innovative solutions. Simultaneously, recognizing the existence and the connection between the core and the periphery will allow for the optimal allocation of available resources and the ability to focus on issues that are key to the specific territory. However, it is necessary to consider certain peculiarities of the «core-periphery» model:
The existence of economic disparities and differences between the core and peripheral parts of the region. To support the development of the core as a priority, it is necessary to ensure the development of industry, access to resources, and infrastructure development. The uneven development of different regions of the country, which will lead to an uneven distribution of public goods within Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Alkhovetska, O. (2008). Center and periphery in the economy of the European Union at the current stage of expansion. European Economy, 7(3). URL: https://jeej.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/ukjee/article/download/121/121/238 [in Ukrainian].
Matveieva, O. (Ed.). (2023). Open science as a priority of the post-war recovery policy of Ukraine and its acquisition of the EU member status: International collective monograph. Kyiv. 572 p.
URL: http://surl.li/uetvc [in Ukrainian].
Vermenych, Y. (2022). The dichotomy “center-periphery” in the system of spatial structures of the globalized world. International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings, 19 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.15407/mzu2022.31.183 [in Ukrainian].
National Institute of Strategic Studies. (n.d.). Concept of the strategy for post-war recovery and development of Ukraine. URL: http://surl.li/uetvh [in Ukrainian].
Kozireva, O., & Kozireva, A. (2017). Research of approaches to the definition of center-peripheral relations between the regions of Ukraine. Scientific Herald of Uzhgorod National University, 13/1, 124–129. URL: http://surl.li/uetuu [in Ukrainian].
Shmygal, D. (2023, July). Conferences on the reconstruction of Ukraine: Ukraine considers 10 key aspects of the country’s recovery. URL: http://surl.li/uetwo [in Ukrainian].
Leshchukh, I. V. (2020). Center-periphery: determination of the spheres of interaction of the regional center and the districts of the region. Effective Economy: Electronic Scientific Professional Publication, 6. URL: www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/6_2020/59.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Maksimenko, A. (2020). Theoretical approaches to the study of center-periphery interactions: interdisciplinary discourse. International and Political Studies, 33, 68–88.
DOI: 10.18524/2707-5206.2020.33.208017 URL: http://heraldiss.onu.edu.ua/article/view/208017 [in Ukrainian].
Ministry of Reintegration of the Temporarily Occupied Territories of Ukraine. (2022, July 6).
$750 billion is needed for the post-war recovery of Ukraine – Denys Shmygal. URL: https://minre.gov.ua/2022/07/06/dlya-povoyennogo-vidnovlennya-ukrayiny-potribno-750-mlrd-denys-shmygal/# [in Ukrainian].
International historical experience of post-war economic reconstruction: lessons for Ukraine. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference on April 27, 2023. Kyiv. 126 p.
URL: http://surl.li/uetxh [in Ukrainian].
Nebrat, V. (2023). Foreign experience and national priorities for the strategy of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. Economics and Forecasting, 2, 134-159. URL: http://eip.org.ua/docs/EP_23_2_134_uk.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Patytska, K. O. (2020). Theoretical foundations for the definition of center-periphery interactions in the conditions of socio-economic differentiation of regional development. Regional Development, 1. URL: https://re.gov.ua/re202001/re202001_033_PatytskaKhO.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Post-war recovery of Ukraine: rebuilding for a better future. Analytical document and recommendations. Kyiv, 2022. 40 p. URL: http://surl.li/uetug [in Ukrainian].
President of Ukraine. (2022, April 21). Issues of the National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the consequences of the war. Law of Ukraine No. 266/2002. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/266/2022#Text [in Ukrainian].
Patytska, K., Hrynchyshyn, I., Leshchukh, I., Maksimenko, A., & Bas-Yurchyshyn, M. (2021). Center-periphery interactions in the conditions of decentralization: regional and local dimensions. Lviv: Lviv Research Institute of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 292 p. URL: https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20210004.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development interventions: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jregsc/v52y2012i1p134-152.html
Copus, A. (2001). From core‐periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies, 9(4), 539–552. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713666491
Dunayev, I. (2016). Regional modernization and managerial innovations: the best foreign experience for Ukraine. Social Economy, 51(1), 39–51. DOI: 10.26565/2524-2547-2016-51-05 URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/soceconom/article/view/7221
Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional development policy: A case study of Venezuela. Cambridge: MIT Press. URL: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262060134/regional-development-policy/
Gräbner, C., & Hafele, J. (2020). The emergence of core-periphery structures in the European Union: A complexity perspective. ZOE Discussion Papers, 6. URL: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224134/1/172895116X.pdf
Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Lake Success: United Nations Department of Economic Affairs. URL: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ecrcol093/29973.htm
Prebisch, R. (1976). A critique of peripheral capitalism. CEPAL Review. URL: http://archivo.cepal.org/pdfs/cdPrebisch/253.pdf
Perroux, F. (1955). Economic Space: Theory and Applications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (1), 89–104. URL: http://surl.li/uetua
Pugalis, L., & Gray, N. (2016). New regional development paradigm: an exposition of place-based modalities. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 22(1), 181–203. URL: http://surl.li/uettv
Rogers, E. (n.d.). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. von Thünen, J. H. (1825/2003). The isolated state in relation to agriculture and economics. Hamburg: Friedrich Perthes. URL: http://surl.li/uetts
Yap, X.-S., & Rajah, R. (2016). Catching up and leapfrogging: The new latecomers in the integrated circuits industry. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. URL: http://surl.li/uettp
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/178015
