Analysing territorial impact assessment dynamic in cross-border regions: challenges and future perspectives
Abstract
This article presents a novel methodological approach to territorial impact assessment in border regions: Dynamical Territorial Impact Assessment (DyTIA). Grounded in dynamical systems theory, DyTIA offers a framework for modelling complex and interdependent relationships between economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions of territorial development. In contrast to conventional static methodologies, DyTIA focuses on identifying feedback loops, time lags, threshold effects, and network interactions, thereby enabling a more accurate representation of the dynamic and often non-linear nature of border regions. The methodology was tested using data from the European Court of Auditors covering 23 INTERREG V-A programmes (2014–2020). The analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in funding allocations and thematic priorities across different border regions. Notably, the largest share of funding (23.2%) was directed towards the thematic objective of environmental protection and resource efficiency, highlighting the increasing importance of sustainability within EU cohesion policy. A case study based on the Greater Region programme demonstrated DyTIA’s capacity to uncover complex territorial effect chains and to support optimized resource allocation, especially under the constraints of a projected 18.6% budget reduction in the INTERREG NEXT framework for the 2021–2027 period. Particularly insightful was the analysis of interactions between different thematic objectives, which revealed synergistic effects that enhance overall territorial impact. Beyond its analytical utility, DyTIA also serves a strategic governance function. In the context of Ukraine’s European integration, DyTIA gains relevance as a policy tool for supporting the inclusion of Ukrainian border regions into the European space. The EGTC Tisza is examined as a pilot project for adapting DyTIA to the specific challenges of post-war recovery and EU accession preparation. Based on these findings, the article offers practical recommendations for applying DyTIA in national and regional strategic planning processes, for strengthening the institutional capacity of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs), and for establishing a network of “territorial development and security laboratories” along Ukraine’s western border. Special attention is given to incorporating the security dimension into territorial impact assessments, in response to emerging geopolitical challenges. Ultimately, DyTIA is not only a methodological innovation but also part of a broader rethinking of how territorial development in border regions is conceptualized and governed. In a time of profound geopolitical changes, dynamic models such as DyTIA are essential for designing effective, sustainable, and inclusive strategies—strategies that contribute to integration and resilience, and help shape a more stable and secure European space, with Ukraine as an integral participant.
Downloads
References
Böhme, K., & Lüer, C. (2016). Assessing territorial impacts of future EU policies. Terra Spectra: Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning, 8(1), 22–27.
Building More Resilient Cross border Regions. (2024). Considerations in governance and partnerships. OECD Multi-level Governance Studies. OECD Publishing. Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/d5fd3e59-en
Caesar, B. (2017). European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation: A means to harden spatially dispersed cooperation? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 4(1), 247–254.
Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial Impact Assessment for European regions:
A methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 342–350.
Dąbrowski, M., Musiałkowska, I., & Polverari, L. (2018). EU-China and EU–Brazil policy transfer in regional policy. Regional Studies, 52(9), 1169–1180.
Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge.
Engl, A. (2016). Bridging borders through institution-building: The EGTC as a facilitator of institutional integration in cross-border regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(2), 143–169.
ESPON (2012). ARTS – Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity. Luxembourg: ESPON.
ESPON (2013). EATIA – ESPON and Territorial Impact Assessment. Luxembourg: ESPON.
European Commission (2017). Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions (COM (2017) 534 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2021). EU Border Regions: Living labs of European integration (COM (2021) 393 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2023). Guidance for resilience analysis. Brussels: European Commission.
European Court of Auditors (2021). Interreg cooperation: The potential of the European Union’s cross-border regions has not yet been fully unlocked. Special report 14/2021. Luxembourg: European Court of Auditors.
European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union (1999). URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a8abd557-e346-4531-a6ef-e81d3d95027f/language-en
European Union (2007). Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Union, C 306, 17.12.2007.
Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? London: Routledge.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.
Gänzle, S., & Kern, K. (2016). A ‘Macro-regional’ Europe in the Making: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guidebook on registering EGTCs (2021). Report of the European Committee of the Regions.
Katok, A., Hasselblatt, B. (1999). Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems: Cambridge University Press.
Kiryukhin A. (2016). Stability of cross-border functional region in the context of counter integrations. Part I. Theoretical and historical aspects. Regional Innovations, no. 4, 51–62. URL: http://irn.center/2016_4_regional-innovations-journal-special-issue-has-been-issued/
Kolosov, V. et Scott, J. (2013). Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo N1 Modelling and benchmarking of borders. URL: http://belgeo.revues.org/10532
Martinelli, F. (2019). A Dynamic Theory of Regional Inequalities: Production, Capital Mobility and Trade. Regional Studies, 53(7), 977–990.
Medeiros, E. (2015). Territorial Impact Assessment and Cross-Border Cooperation. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 97–115.
Medeiros, E. (2016). Territorial Cohesion: An EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 60, 1–30.
Medeiros, E. (2017). From smart growth to European spatial planning: a new paradigm for EU cohesion policy post-2020. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1856–1875.
Medeiros, E. (2018). The Role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU Cohesion Policy. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation (pp. 69-93). Cham: Springer.
Medeiros E. (Ed.) (2020) Territorial Impact Assessment. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54502-4
Mesarovic, M.D., Takahara Y. (1975). General Systems Theory: Mathematical Foundations. Mathematic in science and engineering. Vol. 113.
Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 153–171.
Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC).
Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC).
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Strengthening the Resilience of EU Border Regions. Mapping Risks & Crisis Management Tools and Identifying Gaps (2024). URL: https://nordregio.org/research/strengthening-the-resilience-of-eu-border-regions-mapping-risks-crisis/
Svensson, S., & Nordlund, C. (2015). The building blocks of a Euroregion: Novel metrics to measure cross-border integration. Journal of European Integration, 37(3), 371–389.
Telle, S. (2017). Euroregions as soft spaces: Between consolidation and transformation. European Spatial Research and Policy, 24(2), 93–110.
Telle, S., Špaček, M., & Crăciun, D. (2020). Divergent paths to cohesion: The (unintended) consequences of a place-based Cohesion Policy. In I. Musiałkowska, P. Idczak & O. Potluka (Eds.), Successes & Failures in EU Cohesion Policy: An Introduction to EU cohesion policy in Eastern, Central, and Southern Europe. 7–28. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Territorial Cohesion – The Story (2023). URL: https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/Territorial-Cohesion-The-Story-draft-30-June-2023.pdf
Unfried, M., Kersken, K., & Espeter, M. (2016). “Cross-border impact assessment“ als Beispiel für grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit im öffentlichen Sektor: Entstehung, Relevanz und Grenzen. Der moderne Staat, 9(1), 187–210.
Wille Ch. (2024). Border Complexities. Outlines and Perspectives of a Complexity Shift in Border Studies. In Christian Wille, Carolin Leutloff-Grandits, Falk Bretschneider, Syvie Grimm-Hamen, Hedwig Wagner (Eds.). Border Complexities and Logics of Dis/Order. Nomos. 31–55). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748922292