Classics’ Scientific Exploration of the Theory of Risk Society: Similarities and Differences of Scientific Ideas

Abstract

This article analyzes the main provisions of the theory of risk society represented in U. Beckꞌs, N. Luhmannꞌs, E. Giddensꞌs works. Based on research of primary sources, the author has attempted structuring theoriesof risk society through provisiononsimilarities and differencesofclassicalapproaches to thetheory of risk society in sociological views on the nature of risk as socialbaseofcontemporarysocieties. In the article the directionsofcriticism of the U. Beckꞌs theory of risk societyare presented, the ontology of risk as part of communication and social systemsbyN. Luhmannis analyzed, the risk-optimistic forecastsby E. Giddensare given. The author emphasizes the common positionofclassical theory of risk society of the double risk presenceon structural and activity levels as an indicator of their syntheticsociological approaches. The author argues the thesis about the transformation of contemporary society threats and hazards in social risks. The study shows «weaknesses» of theories of the risk society, which actualizes the need for further development of the designated problems, including domestic sociologists.