Social Rehabilitation of Prisoners in Ukrainian Prisons by Kharkov Region

Keywords: prison rehabilitation, time discounting, gender differences, prisonization

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of “time discounting” and its relationship with deviant behavior, whereas higher levels of delinquency are affected by a desire for immediate gratification, or high level of discounting of behavioral consequences. Ideally rehabilitation process should help prisoners to extend their time horizons and start valuing the future, which will help to prevent future deviant behavior. Data analysis showed that in Ukraine the ability to defer gratification is more likely to be exhibited by females, older people, those who receive letters by mail, and those who are single. Contradictory to the initial expectations time discounting is actually increased with factors such as spending time in mandatory rehabilitation programs, spending time in prison, and being in prison repeatedly, which allows us to start questioning the effectiveness of prison rehabilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marianna Klochko, Ohio State University, Marion Campus, Marion, OH 43302-5628, Mt. Vernon Avenue, 1465, USA

PhD of Sociology, Associate Professor of Sociology, klochko.1@osu.edu

References

1. Alpern, Liudmila. 2001[1]. Vsego lish desiataia chast: zhenshchiny i deti v rossiiskoi tiurme: zametki posetitelia tiurem. [Only one-tenth… Women and children in Russian prison. Observations of prison visitor]. Moskva: Tsentr sodeistviia reforme ugolovnogo pravosudiia.

2. Alpern, Liudmila. 2001[2]. Zhenshchiny v rossiiskoi tiurme: problemy, svidetelstva, vzgliad iznutri; sbornik materialov [Women in Russian prison: problems, testaments, the look from within; Collected materials]. Moskva: Tsentr sodeistviia reforme ugolovnogo pravosudiia.

3. Alpern, Liudmila. 2001[3]. K voprosu o sotsialnoi reabilitatsii naibolee uiazvimykh grupp tiuremnogo naseleniia (podrostki, zhenshchiny): materialy issledovaniia, mneniia, lichnye dokumenty. [Towards the question of social rehabilitation of the most disadvantaged groups of prison population (teenagers, women): research, opinions, and personal documents]. Moskva: Tsentr sodeistviia reforme ugolovnogo pravosudiia.

4. Banwell, Suzanna, Erin Barclay, Elizabeth Duban, and Robin Philips. 2000. Domestic Violence in Ukraine. Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights, Minneapolis. www.mnadvocates.org

5. Brykczynska, Gosia. 2002. “”Prisons and Prisoners: Some Observations, Comments and Ethical Reflections Based on a Visit to a Prison Hospital in the Ukrainian Republic”. Nursing Ethics 9(4): 361-372

6. Chesney-Lind, Meda. 1989. “Girls’ Crime and Woman’s Place: Toward a feminist Model of female delinquency.” Crime and Delinquency 35: 5-29.

7. Clemmer, Donald. 1940. The Prison Community. Christopher Publishing house.

8. Daly, Kathleen. 1998. “Gender, Crime and Criminology.” The Handbook of Crime and Punishment. Michael Tonry (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press: 85-108.

9. Davids, Anthony and Bradley B. Falkof. 1975. “Juvenile Delinquents Then and Now: Comparison of Findings from 1959 and 1974.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 84(2): 161-164.

10. Ganguli, Ina and Katherine Terrell. 2006. “Institutions, markets and men’s and women’s wage inequality: Evidence from Ukraine”, Journal of Comparative Economics 34: 200-227.

11. Giallombardo, Rose. 1966. “Social Roles in a prison for women”, Social Problems 13(3): 268-288.

12. Gottfredson, Michael and Travis Hirshi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

13. Johnson, Janet E. 2007. “Domestic Violence Politics in Post-Soviet States”. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 14(3): 380-405.

14. Klochko, Marianna. 2006. “Time Preference and Self-Selection vs. Socialization: A Case Study of Ukrainian Students.” Rationality and Society 18(3): 305-331.

15. Kolstad, Arnulf. 1996. “Imprisonment as rehabilitation: Offenders’ assessment of why it does not work.” Journal of Criminal Justice 24(4): 323-335.

16. Lehman, Hartmut, Norberto Pignatti and Jonathan Wadsworth. 2006. “The incidence and cost of job loss in the Ukrainian labor market”. Journal of Comparative Economics 34: 248-271

17. Oleinik, Anton. 2006. “A plurality of total institutions: towards a comparative penology.” Crime, Law and Social Change 46:161-180.

18. Pallot, Judith 2007. “’Gde muzh, tam zhena’ (where the husband is, so is the wife): space and gender in post-Soviet patterns of penality.” Environment and Planning 39: 570-589.

19. Piquero, Alex and Stephen Tibbetts. 1996. “Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offender’s decision making: toward a more complete model of rational offending”, Justice Quarterly 13: 481-508.

20. Rogers, Alan R. 1994. “Evolution of Time Preference by Natural selection.” The American Economic Review 84(3): 460-481.

21. Rubin, Paul H. and Paul, Cris W. 1979. “An evolutionary model of tastes for risk.” Economic Inquiry 17(4): 585-596.

22. Smith, Douglas A., and Raymond Paternoster. 1987. “The Gender Gap in Theories of Deviance: Issues and Evidence.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 24:140-172

23. Whitman, James Q. 2003. Harsh Justice. Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. Oxford University Press.
Published
2019-08-12
How to Cite
Klochko, M. (2019). Social Rehabilitation of Prisoners in Ukrainian Prisons by Kharkov Region. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, methods", (1053), 119-127. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/ssms/article/view/13771
Section
Empirical Researches of Modern Society