Administrative-territorial reform: results of integration of the consolidated territorial communities (CTC) in the Khmelnytsky region
Abstract
The article reviews the changes in administrative-territorial division of the Khmelnytsky region that occurred due to the reform of the territorial organization of power inUkraine. The authors have given an assessment of the methodic of formation of the territorial communities capable for social and economic development, analyzed the definition of the territorial community capable for social and economic development, and defined the requirements for creation of the necessary infrastructure for community development. Consolidated territorial communities, created in the Khmelnytsky region, were divided into groups in terms of their economic capacity. The article also presents specific achievements of the consolidated territorial communities over the year 2016.
The authors pointed out the least and most dependent communities on the state budget, separately distinguishing the communities functioning as donors of the state budget, and analyzed the communities in terms of their own budget profits per capita. It was defined that creation of the consolidated territorial communities in most cases resulted in duplication of budget revenues per capita. However, economic viability of the newly created consolidated territorial communities is quite irregular: communities that have a large territory with a small number of people and are situated in remote areas of the region have a considerably lower own income per capita.
Downloads
References
2. Vrublevskyi, O.S. (2009). Metodyka modelyuvannya terytorialnykh hromad [Methodology of modeling of the ter-ritorial communities]. Civil society institution. K., 16.
3. Hanushchak, G. (2013). Reforma terytorialnoyi organizatsii vlady [Reform of the territorial organization of power]. Swiss-Ukrainian project «Support of decentralization in Ukraine – DESPRO». K.: Pvt. Ltd. «Sofia-A», 160.
4. Bafoil, F. (2010). Regionalization and decentralization in a comparative perspective. Eastern Europe and Poland – Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
5. Kulesza, M. (2002). Methods and Techniques of Managing Decentralization Reforms in the CEE Countries: The Polish Experience. Mastering Decentralization and Public Administration Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. OSI / LGI, 189-214.
6. Ministerstvo regionalnoho rozvytku, budivnytstva ta zhytlovo-komunalnoho hospodarstva Ukrainy, Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy. Detsentralizatsiya: vykonannya dokhodiv mistsevykh byudzhetiv za 2016 rik [The Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing – Communal Services of Ukraine, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. Decentralization: implementation of income of the local budgets for 2016].
Copyright (c) 2017 Anatoliy Melnychuk, Tetiana Melnyk
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.