Dynamics of territorial and political conflicts in the world

  • Roman Slyvka Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
Keywords: territorial and political conflicts, geography of conflict, conflict issue, duration of the conflict, conflict intensity

Abstract

Application of quantitative approach allows for gaining new results on trends of the dynamics of territorial and political conflicts (TPC). The objective of the article is to determine the dynamics in the number of territorial and political conflicts in individual macro-regions and in the whole world. The task of the article is to give grounds for viability of allocating groups of conflicts characterized by territorial manifestation from HIIK database “Conflict Barometer”; to determine the dynamics of a series of indicators typical of territorial and political conflicts in 2004-2014.

Analysis of TPC development in the world using the data presented in the reports of HIIK “Conflict Barometer” (2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014) was made. Out of all political conflicts characterized by such conflict issues as: 1. Territory; 2. Autonomy; 3. Secession; 4. Subnational Predominance; 5. Resources, TPC sampling was performed. Attention was also paid to TPC, which were characterized by a combination of several conflict issues.

It has been established that over the decade under study, the number of conflicts that belong to TPC group has significantly increased from 114 to 253, i.e. in 2.2 times. This increase occurred in a wave-like manner. Over the period under study, the average intensity of TPC in the world has increased. In absolute terms, the largest increase in the number of conflicts took place in Asia and Africa, and the largest relative increase was inAmerica(3.5 times) andOceania(7 times). TPC duration has also grown. The largest number of TPC concerned the authority in the region and autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roman Slyvka, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
PhD (Geography), Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Nature Studies

References

1. Dnistryansky, M. (2011). Geopolityka: Navchalnyi posibnyk. [Geopolitics: Tutorial]. Lviv: Ivan Franko Lviv Na-tional University, 436.

2. Pocheptsov, G. (2015). Instrumentariy khaosa v gibridnoy voyne [Instrumentary of chaos in the hybrid war]. Khvylya, 26 oktyabrya. Available at: http://hvylya.net/analytics/geopolitics/instrumentariy-haosa-v-gibridnoy-voyne.html

3. Sadovnichiy, V.A. and others (2012). Modelirovanie i prognozirovanie mirovoy dinamiki [Modeling and forecasting world dynamics]. Moscow: ISPI RAN, 359.

4. Slyvka, R.R. (2010). Zastosuvannya indeksu nediezdatnosti derzhav u doslidzhenni konfliktnoi sytuatsii v regionakh Chornoho, Chervonoho moriv ta Skhidnoho Seredzemnomoria [The application of state disability index in the study of conflicts in the regions of the Black, Red and eastern Mediterranean Seas]. Geography and Tourism: Sci-entific journal. K.: Alterpres, 10, 90-97.

5. Slyvka, R.R. (2012). Vplyv vertykalno-strukturnykh polityko-geografichnykh protsesiv na geokonfliktolohichnu sytuatsiyu v sviti [Effects of vertical and structural political and geographical processes on geoconflict situation in the world]. Bulletin of Lviv University. Geographical series. Lviv, 40(2), 144-151.

6. Shavalyuk, L. (2015). Kinets ery dolara? Amerykanska prychyna [Is it the end of dollar era? American reason]. The economic truth. Available at: http://www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2015/11/20/568403/

7. Shvets, A.B. (2013). Algoritm geograficheskogo izucheniya sotsio-kulturnoy konfliktnosti [Algorithm of geo-graphical study of socio-cultural conflict situations]. Modern directions of theoretical and applied researches (Odessa, 19-30 March). Issue 1. Vol. 44. CIT: 113-0181.Odessa: KUPRIENKO, 72-82.

8. Chizhevskiy, A.L. (1976). Zemnoe ekho solnechnykh bur [Earth echo of solar storms]. Moscow: Mysl, 367.

9. Agnew, J., Ulrich, O. (2013). Overlapping Territorialities, Sovereignty in Dispute: Empirical Lessons from Latin America. Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Socal Movement, 121-140. Available at: http://blogs.ubc.ca/politicalgeography/files/2015/09/Agnew_Oslender_Overlapping_Territories.pdf

10. Barnett, J. (2009). Enviromental Security. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography [Editors-in-Chief Rob Kitchin, and Nigel Thrift]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3, 553-564.

11. Buhaug, H. (2005). Accounting for scale: Measuring geography in quantitative studies of civil war. Political Geography, 24, 399-418.

12. Cairo, H. (2004). The Field of Mars: heterotopias of territory and war. Political Geography, 23, 1009-1036.

13. Cashin, P., Mohaddes, K., Raissi, M. (2014). Fair Weather or Foul? The Macroeconomic Effects of El Niño. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 1418. Available at: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe1418.pdf.

14. Cashman, G. (2013). What Causes War? An Introduction to Theories of International Conflict. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth: ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD, 607. (Second edition).

15. Climate change and conflict: Making sense of disparate findings (2014). Political Geography, 43, 1-5.

16. Collier, P., Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and Grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563-595.

17. Conflict Barometer 2014: disputes, non-violent crises, violent crises, limited wars, wars (2015). Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research. Heidelberg, 23. Available at: http://www.hiik.de/en/konfliktbarometer/

18. Donaldson, J. (2014). Re-thinking international boundary practices: moving away from «edge». Geographies of peace. London, New-York: I.B. Tauris, 63-74.

19. Fearon, J.D. (2004). Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 275-301.

20. Fund for Peace Fragile States Index. Available at: http://fsi.fundforpeace.org/

21. Gleditch, N.P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M. and oth. (2002). Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39, 615-637.

22. Gochman, C., Sabrosky, A.N. (1990). “Capability-Driven Disputes,” in Prisoners of War? Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

23. Gregory, D. (2010). Seeing Red: Baghdad and the event-ful city. Political Geography, 29, 266-279.

24. Gurňák, D. (2007). Vývoj politickej mapy stredovýhodnej a juhovýhodnej Eurôpy – historickogeografická analýza. Bratislava: KARTPRINT, 208.

25. Hensel, P.R. (2000). Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict. John A. Vasquez, ed., What Do We Know about War? Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, forthcoming. Available at: http://www.paulhensel.org/Research/terr2000.pdf

26. Hsiang, S.M., Meng, K.C., Cane, M.A. (2011). Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate. Nature, 476, 438-441.

27. Kaldor, M. (2013). In Defence of New Wars. Stability, 2, 1-16.

28. Kolossov, V., O’Loughlin, J. (2011). Economic Insecurities and Migration in the “De Facto” States of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Eurasian Geography and Economy, 52(5), 596-630.

29. Kugler, J., Organski, A. (1989). The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation. Handbook of War Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 171-194.

30. Marshall, M. G., Cole, B. R. (2014). Global Report 2014: Conflict, Governance and State Fragility. Vienna, VA: Center for Systematic Peace, 55.

31. Minca, C., Rowan, R. (2015). The question of space in Carl Schmitt. Progress in Human Geography, 39, 268-289.

32. Mountz, A. (2013). Political geography I: Reconfiguring geographies of sovereignty. Progress in Human Geography, 37 (6), 829-841.

33. Newman, D. (2012). Borders and Conflict Resolution, in Thomas Wilson and Hastings Donnan, eds., A Companion to Border Studies, Blackwell, 14, 249-265.

34. Opportunities for peace and risk scenarios for 2015 (2014). ECP Database on Conflict and Peacebuilding. Avail-able at: http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ResumenEjecutivo2015i.pdf, http://escolapau.uab.cat/english/conflictandpeacebuilding/index.php

35. Pacione, M. (2011). Applied Geography: Principles and Praxis. Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik, 73, 7-28.

36. Raleigh, C. (2015). Geographies of Conflict. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography John Agnew, Virginie Mamadouh, Anna J. Secor, Joanne Sharp. Hoboken: The Wiley Blackwell, 86-99.

37. Raleigh, C., Hegre, H. (2009). Population size, concentration, and civil war. A geographically disaggregated analysis. Political Geography, 28, 224-238.

38. Roser, M. (2016). War and Peace after 1946. Our World In Data.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace-after-1945/

39. Roser, M. (2016). War and Peace over the Long Run. Our World In Data.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace-long-run

40. Solar Cycle Prediction (Updated 2016/01/12) (2016). NASA. Solar Physics. Marshall Space Flight Center. Available at: http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml

41. Taylor, A. (2009). Belonging. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. [Editors-in-Chief Rob Kitchin, and Nigel Thrift]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol. 1, 294-299.

42. Tomeš, J., Festa, D., Novotný, J. (2007). Konflikt svétů a svét konfliktů. Praha: Nakladatelství P3K, 349.

43. UCDP /PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset v. 4-2015, 1946–2014. Uppsala Conflict Data Program. Available at: http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/ucdp_prio_armed_conflict_dataset/
Published
2017-01-14
Cited
How to Cite
Slyvka, R. (2017). Dynamics of territorial and political conflicts in the world. Human Geography Journal, 21(2), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.26565/2076-1333-2016-21-04