STATE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CONTEXT OF FORMING POLITICAL SPACE IN THE INFORMATION AGE: MAIN DEVELOPMENT TRENDS

Keywords: power, state, capacity, identity, institutions, sovereignty, political processes, political space, world order

Abstract

The features of the transformations of state sovereignty in the information age are considered. Principled approaches to defining sovereignty and the state in political philosophy are highlighted. The emphasis is on the fact that the state must solve the problem of streamlining the activities of all existing institutions, so that the people benefit from their activities. The conditions that influence the components of state sovereignty, primarily the characteristics of the state, are analyzed. A comparative measurement of the classical understanding of sovereignty and related practices with its modern definition is provided. Particular attention is paid to the formation of political space. It is determined that the sovereignty of the state was classically associated with the spatial definition of the sphere of implementation of sovereign power, with a territory defined by borders. In the issue of the evolution of sovereignty, it is emphasized that the national-territorial identity that accompanies the processes of the formation of modern states is no longer based only on territorial markers, visualized symbols of the embodiment of power – the personalities of the rulers (typical of previous eras), but on the presence of common values ​​and cultural codes for large communities of people. The existence of a common socio-cultural field in society is becoming more relevant, integrating each individual into a specific community with its own interests – the nation, which is certainly strengthened and supported by the state. The information age is shaping a new dimension of space that corresponds to its fundamental qualities, when information, knowledge, and communication become the driving forces of productivity and power. Power, as the substantive core of state sovereignty at the information stage of development, is actively manifested through the ability to produce and control the values and cultural codes of society. The achievements of informatization and digitalization of public life as an important trend of modern development are dialectically connected with the processes of another leading trend – globalization.

It is determined that the contradictions and conflicts of universalism and particularism shape the logic of the modern reformatting of the world order, set the tension of instability, and increase the risks of uncertainty and unpredictability of the consequences of political decisions and actions. The complexity of the architecture of the distribution of power in the world, the latency and uncoordinated processes of interaction, the multilevel nature and contradictions of simultaneously existing identities are important global trends. The sovereignty of the state requires the powerful formation and support of ideological components, the protection of the unique values and cultural codes of the nation, which define the modern political space, which is largely virtualized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kostiantyn Brynza, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD student, Department of Political Sciences.

References

Lagi, S. 2015. Georg Jellinek, a Liberal Political Thinker Between the Habsburg Empire and Germany (1885-1898) Working Papers in Philosophy . Szerkesztő: Kovács Gábor. 2015/1. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/e27ce42c-4f3c-2581-e053-d805fe0acbaa/workingpaper.pdf

Oliynyk Yu. 2023. The influence of Maurice Oriu's political and legal views on the formation of the concept of pluralistic democracy. Bulletin of Lviv University. Law Series. Issue 77: 68–78.

Tilly Ch. 1992. Coercion, Capital аnd European States, A.D. 990-1990. Oxford. 271 p. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20210122131940/https://books.google.com/books?id=5pcynQEACAAJ

Matsievsky Y. V. In the Trap of Hybridity: Zigzags of Transformations of the Political Regime in Ukraine (1991-2014): monograph. Chernivtsi: Knygy – XXI, 2016. 552 p. URL: http://resource.history.org.ua/item/0013848

Castells, M. 2007. Internet Galaxy. Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society /trans. from English. K.: Vakler. 304 p.

Bauman, Z. 2008. Globalization. Consequences for individuals and society /Translated from English. Publishing house «Kyiv-Mohyla Academy». 108 р.

Standing G. 2021. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. SPECIAL COVID-19 EDITION. Bloomsbury. 256 p.

Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2023. Analytical study // NGO “Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism”, F. Ebert Foundation. 2024. Kyiv: LLC “Vistka”. 336 p. URL: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/ukraine/21179.pdf

Bevz T. 2013. Sovereignty as an integral feature of the state in the documents and practice of Ukrainian state-building. 9. Scientific notes of the Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies named after I. F. Kuras of the NAS of Ukraine. Issue 3(65). pp. 190-212. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzipiend_2013_3_11

Komarova Tetiana, Kononenko Valery. 2025. Cultural creativity as a sphere of formation of political values: theater in front-line Kharkiv. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series «Issues of Political Science» 47: 94-102. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2025-47-11

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Brynza, K. (2026). STATE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CONTEXT OF FORMING POLITICAL SPACE IN THE INFORMATION AGE: MAIN DEVELOPMENT TRENDS. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Issues of Political Science", 49, 113-119. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2026-49-14