THE MONOMAJORITY ILLUSION: THE ROLE OF OLIGARCHIC DEPUTY GROUPS IN UKRAINE’S PARLIAMENTARY COALITION

Keywords: parliamentary coalition, monomajority, political parties, parliamentary factions, deputy groups, neopatrimonial regime, Verkhovna Rada

Abstract

The article examines the factional structure of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in its IX convocation (2019-2026) and the role of oligarchic deputy groups in forming a hybrid parliamentary coalition. The dynamics of changes in the parliamentary structure are examined, with particular attention paid to the emergence of deputy groups in the Verkhovna Rada alongside party factions. Empirical evidence from marker votes (prime minister appointments and annual state budget approvals) demonstrates that, since 2021, the formal «monomajority» of the «Servant of the People» faction has been unable to independently secure the required quorum. It is shown that under these conditions, four oligarchic deputy groups – «For the Future», «Trust», «Platform for Life and Peace» and «Restoration of Ukraine» – act as stabilizers of the monomajority. The history of creation, formal leaders, and real beneficiaries of these groups has been analyzed. A distinctive feature of these groups is the absence of an electoral mandate, which exempts them from political accountability to voters. The conclusion is drawn that this hybrid coalition configuration lacks a programmatic-ideological dimension but is fully consistent with the patronal-client logic of the political regime. Political loyalty to the president as the «supreme patron» is exchanged by the deputy groups and their beneficiaries for protection of economic interests, business preferences, legal immunity, and other benefits. The historical continuity and structural reproducibility of this model are substantiated, where the presidential faction enters into informal alliances with oligarchic deputy groups to maintain control over parliament. Corresponding oligarchic deputy groups in the Verkhovna Rada of the VI–VIII convocations are identified – «Reforms for the Future», «Sovereign European Ukraine», «Economic Development», «People’s Will» and «Revival». It is noted that in the overwhelming majority of cases such deputy groups consist of «majoritarians». On this basis, the role of the mixed electoral system with a majoritarian component as a factor facilitating the formation of parliamentary coalitions in the interests of presidents is argued.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Fisun, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Head of Department of Political Science, Dr.Sc. habil (Political Science), Professor.

Anton Avksentiev, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science, Ph.D in Political Science.

References

Matsiyevsky, Yu. 2025. How Zelensky Has Leveraged Oligarchs for the War Without Dismantling Ukraine’s Patronal System. In: Political Dynamics in Ukraine. PONARS Eurasia Policy Perspectives. Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES), The George Washington University, 62-71. URL: https://bunny-wp-pullzone-a7uhvox9dj.b-cdn. net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Political_Dynamics_ in_Ukraine_2025_-1.pdf.

Vyhovska, V. 2024. Presidential Power: Measurement and Comparison of Presidents' Strength. Vox Ukraine. URL: https://voxukraine.org/prezydentska-vlada-vymiryuvannya-ta-porivnyannya-syly-prezydentiv (in Ukrainian).

Zelenko, H., Kovalevskyi, V. 2023. Ukraine as a “Capture State”: Teleological Constitutionalism and Real Politics. In: Political System of Ukraine: Constitutional Model and Political Practices, edited by H. Zelenko et al., 308-347. Kyiv: Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.53317/978-617-14-0109-9 (in Ukrainian).

Lazarova, S. 2025. Crutches for the Monomajority: Who Is Saving «Servant of the People» from Collapse in the Verkhovna Rada. Glavkom. URL: https://glavcom.ua/publications/militsi-dlja-monobilshosti-khto-rjatuje-sluhu-narodu-vid-krakhu-u-verkhovnij-radi-1084208.html (in Ukrainian).

Fisun, O., Movchan, U. 2023. Regime Cycles and Neopatrimonialism in Ukraine. In: Ukraine’s Patronal Democracy and the Russian Invasion: The Russia-Ukraine War, Volume One, edited by B. Madlovics and B. Magyar, 119-140. Central European University Press. https://doi.org/10.7829/jj.3985461.8

Avksentiev, A., Kyselova, V. 2018. Calculated versus Ideological Motives: The Logic of National and Regional Coalition Formation in Ukraine. The Ideology and Politics Journal, 1(9), 22-65. URL: https://www.ideopol.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018%201.%208.%20ENG.%20Kiseliova%20Avxentiev.%20Demodernization_EditedCB%20(1).pdf

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Official web portal of the Parliament of Ukraine. 2026. URL: https://www.rada.gov.ua

Romaniuk R. 2021a. A group of three people: «For the Future» Palitsa, Kolomoisky and Avakov. Ukrainska Pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2021/08/18/7304170 (in Ukrainian).

Romaniuk R. 2021b. The President's Crutches. Why the «Dovira» Group is Helping Zelensky. Ukrainska Pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2021/09/16/7307291 (in Ukrainian).

Bezpalko, U. 2023. Strangers among their own. What is happening in the OPZH after the party ban and Medvedchuk's treason. RBC. URL: https://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/chuzhi-sered-svoyih-shcho-vidbuvaetsya-opzzh-1681675750.html (in Ukrainian).

Fedorenko, K., Rybiy, O., Umland. A. 2015. The Ukrainian Party System before and after the Euromaidan of 2013–2014. Scientific Notes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Issue 2 (98), 5-43. URL: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/fedorenko_ukrainska.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Fisun, O., & Avksentiev, A. (2026). THE MONOMAJORITY ILLUSION: THE ROLE OF OLIGARCHIC DEPUTY GROUPS IN UKRAINE’S PARLIAMENTARY COALITION. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Issues of Political Science", 49, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2026-49-05