METAPHYSICAL GOOD GROUNDS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-14

Keywords:

goodness, evil, spiritual knowledge, good, peidia, co-existence

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of the good ethics metaphysical basis. As a phenomenon whose nature is transcendent, the good reveals itself in two projective optics. It is on the one hand about the ontological aspects of the good ethics, acting as a being together mode. On the other hand, the relevance of the human charitable nature to the good ethics principles. Thus, the good builds the basis, the output operating mode of co-existence. The phenomenon has objective properties and a universal character. In other words, goodness creates the condition, the nature of the order of being. This logic has traces of Socrates, which identifies concepts: good, knowledge and virtue. Good is a living knowledge that acquires the status of Truth – the knowledge of real. It opens to the person the essence of its purpose, improves and transforms its personality. It is about spiritual knowledge that opens to a person who knows, in the process of mastering the world around him. This knowledge fills the personality with the content, gives uniqueness. It is a living knowledge, aimed at improving the image, its spiritual development, growth. And, consequently, the projection of knowledge-good at the level of society acts as a mechanism for organizing and maintaining social order. A person who through the social context knows the ethical principles of good (love, respect, complicity, etc.), comprehends the laws of the spiritual order. She is an integral part of the order, and thus recognizes itself as real, unique, finds a connection to reality. The transformation of these principles into cultural universal, opens the world to the world as a single whole, an integral part of which is itself. With the explication of meanings, culture «introduces» a person in the previously compiled symbolic-communicative space, forming the ability to understand, with the message, with participation, in general forms an orientation to the community, the integrity of social relations. In this perspective well-being issues are opened. This is the principle of the spiritual knowledge power, realized in accordance with human principles of the good ethics.

Author Biography

  • Yuliia Yu. Brodetska, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University; 72, Gagarin Avenue, 49010, Dnіpro, Ukraine

    D.Sc. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy

References

Aristotle. (1983). Works (Vol. 4. Nicomachean Ethics). (A. I. Dovatur, Trans., Ed.). Мoscow: Mysl.

Berdyaev, N. (1931). About the Appointment of the Person. Paris: Modern Notes, 1931. (In Russian).

Brodetskaya, Yu. (2014). Community Human Relations. Dnepropetrovsk. (In Russian).

Brodetskaya, Yu. (2017). The Phenomenon of the Society Integrity. Dnipro. (In Ukrainian).

Dionysius the Areopagite. (2006). Corpus of Works. (G. Prokhorov, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House. (In Russian).

Diogenes Laertius. (1979). Lives, Teachings, and Sayings of Famous Philosophers. (M. Gasparov, Trans.). Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Frank, S. (1922). Brief Introduction to Philosophy. Saint Petersburg: Academy. (In Russian).

Frank, S. (1990). The Unknowable. Ontological Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Мoscow: Pravda. (In Russian).

Frank, S. (2003). Reality and Man. Metaphysics of Human Existence. In S. Frank, God is with Us (pp. 133–438). Мoscow: AST. (In Russian).

Frank, S. (1992). Spiritual Foundations of Society. Мoscow: Republic. (In Russian).

Frank, S. (1995). On the Subject of Knowledge. The Soul of Man. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).

Guseinov, A. (Ed.). (2015). Ethics: Textbook. Мoscow: Yurayt, 2015. (In Russian).

Heidegger, М. (1997). Being and Time. (V. Bibikhin, Trans). Мoscow: Ad Marginem. (Original work published 1927). (In Russian).

Heidegger, M. (1993). Works and Reflections of Different Years. (A. Mikhailov, Trans). Мoscow: Gnosis. (In Russian).

Jaeger, W. (1954-1955) Paideia, die Formung des Griechischen Menschen (Bd. 1–3). Berlin: W. de Gruyter. (Original work published 1933).

Kukina, E. (2009). “Paideia”: the Essence and Significance in the Historical and Modern Sense. Gumanitarnyye i Sotsialnyye Nauki – Humanities and Social Sciences, 5, 33–40. (In Russian).

Metropolitan of Minsk and Slutsk. (2006). Problem of Evil in Orthodox Theology. The Problem of Evil and Theodicy: Materials of the Intern. conf. Moscow, June 6–9. Мoscow. (In Russian).

Pigalev, A. (2001). Culture as Integrity. Volgograd: Volgograd State University. (In Russian).

Plato. (1998). State. Laws. Politician. (A. Egunov, S. Sheinman-Topshtein, Trans.). Мoscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Solovyov, V. (1988). Works (Vol. 1). Мoscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Solovyov, V. (1989). Works (Vol. 2). Мoscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Skovoroda, G. (1973). Works (Vol. 1). Мoscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Skovoroda, G. (1973). Works (Vol. 2). Мoscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Vinogradov, V. (1994). History of Words. Мoscow: Tolk. Retrieved from http://wordhist.narod.ru. (In Russian).

Zoya, L. (2004). Individuation and Paideia. Zhurnal Prakticheskoy Psikhologii i Psikhoanaliza – Journal of Practical Psychology and Psychoanalysis, 2. Retrieved from http://psyjournal.ru/articles/individuaciya-i-paydeyya. (In Russian).

Downloads

Published

2018-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

METAPHYSICAL GOOD GROUNDS. (2018). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 59, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2018-59-14

Most read articles by the same author(s)