Prevention of reproductive disorders in women with female genital tract malformations

  • Nataliya Veresniuk PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5233-7105
  • Vira Pyrohova M.D., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-6365
Keywords: reproductive disorders, female genital tract malformations

Abstract

Summary. Reproductive health is a priority in today’s global health care system. Among the factors of reproductive health disorders are female genital tract malformations. This pathology is mostly diagnosed with the onset of reproductive disorders at different ages of women, negatively affecting not only the reproductive but also the sexual functions of women, absorbing the quality of her life. The objective: to develop measures for the prevention of reproductive disorders in patients with female genital tract malformations based on the assessment of clinical manifestations and the frequency of reproductive disorders. Materials and methods. A retrospective assessment of reproductive disorders in 84 patients with a verified diagnosis of abnormalities in the development of the female genital organs was performed. The diagnosis was based on complaints, anamnestic data, the results of objective examination, clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods. The control group consisted of 25 women without abnormalities in the development of the female genitalia. Results. The mean age of the surveyed women was 27.6 ± 3.8 years. The duration of verification of the diagnosis of female genital tract malformations from the moment of the first visit to the gynecologist took an average of 3.1 ± 1.3 years. Of all the abnormalities in the development of the female reproductive system, 14.3 % were so-called «obstructive» abnormalities associated with impaired menstrual blood flow. Therefore, their clinical manifestation was earlier and more pronounced than in other patients and was manifested primarily by severe dysmenorrhea. Deviations in the age of onset of menarche occurred in 25 % of patients (OR =8; 95 % CI 1,019 – 62,798). In 73.8 % of women, the first reproductive disorders began during puberty. Dys menorrhea of varying severity occurred in 69.1 % of patients (OR = 7,064; 95 % СІ 2,527 – 19,744), of whom 70.6 % used medical treatment. The share of infertility among the women with anomalies in the development of the reproductive system was 19.1 %, pregnancy loss – 40.5 %. It was found that the risk of miscarriage in patients with congenital pathology of the female genitalia increases significantly (OR = 3,570; 95 % CI 1,125 – 11,325). 34.5 % of patients were diagnosed with genital endometriosis (OR = 6,064; 95 % СI 1,335 – 27,540). In 21.4 % of cases, abnormalities in the development of the female genitals were combined with congenital kidney disease. Conclusions. Prevention and predictability of reproductive disorders in patients with female genital tract malformations should begin with the pubertal period of the girl. A separate risk group consists of girls with pathology of the kidneys diagnosed prenatally. The basis for the prevention of reproductive health disorders in women with female genital tract malformations is the timely verification of congenital pathology and the development of a personalized system of management. The results of our research and the literature suggest that verification of the diagnosis of female genital tract malformations in women usually begins when patients have lost pregnancy or are experiencing infertility, while dysmenorrhea, menstrual irregularities that may occur in adolescence, often do not alert and do not become the basis for exclusion of congenital anomalies. That is why we believe that screening ultrasound examination of the pelvic organs in the presence of these disorders, it is advisable to conduct girls during puberty, if necessary – using 3D ultrasound and/or MRI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nataliya Veresniuk, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University

69, Pekarska st., Lviv, Ukraine, 79010

Vira Pyrohova, M.D., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University

69, Pekarska st., Lviv, Ukraine, 79010

References

Flores M, Glusman G, Brogaard K, Price ND, Hood L. P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society. Per Med. 2013;10(6):565-576. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.13.57

Christiansen ME, Detti L. Clinically Relevant Female Genital Tract Anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017, Mar; 60 (1): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000258

Robbins JB, Broadwell C, Chow LC, Parry JP, Sadowski EA. Müllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015, Jan; 41 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24771

Akhtar MA, Saravelos SH, Li TC, K Jayaprakasan. Reproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies. BJOG. 2020, Apr; 127 (5): e1–e13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15968

Şükür YE, Yakıştıran B, Özmen B, Sönmezer M, Berker B, Atabekoğlu C. Hysteroscopic Corrections for Complete Septate and T-Shaped Uteri Have Similar Surgical and Reproductive Outcome. Reprod Sci. 2018, Dec; 25 (12): 1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118756774

Lovelace D. Congenital Uterine Anomalies and Uterine Rupture. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016, Jul; 61 (4): 501–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12423

Kapczuk K, Friebe Z, Iwaniec K, Kędzia W. Obstructive Müllerian Anomalies in Menstruating Adolescent Girls: A Report of 22 Cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018, Jun; 31 (3): 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2017.09.013

Patel V, Gomez-Lobo V. Obstructive anomalies of the gynecologic tract. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016, Oct; 28 (5): 339–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000300

Kougioumtsidou A, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF, Karavida A, Theodoridis TD, Sotiriadis A, Tarlatzis BC, Athanasiadis AP. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019, Mar; 299 (3): 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05050-x

Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013, Aug; 28 (8): 2032–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098

Maciel C, Bharwani N, Kubik-Huch RA, Manganaro L, Otero-Garcia M, Nougaret S, Alt CD, Cunha TM, Forstner R. MRI of female genital tract congenital anomalies: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2020, Aug; 30 (8): 4272–4283. Epub 2020, Mar 27. PMID: 32221681; PMCID: PMC7338830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06750-8

Published
2020-12-08
How to Cite
Veresniuk, N., & Pyrohova, V. (2020). Prevention of reproductive disorders in women with female genital tract malformations. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Medicine", (40), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.26565/2313-6693-2020-40-12