Corporate social responsibility: model in Germany
Abstract
The article focuses on the concept of corporate social responsibility research in Germany. In the world practice the concept of corporate social responsibility of business has become synonymous to the concept of an effective and transparent business with sustainability effects. Corporate social responsibility is considered as the ability of an organization or an enterprise to evaluate the consequences of their actions for sustainable social development. German multinationals have more positive public image, enhance a modal of profitability, and show the benefits of corporate investments in society.
Presenting the challenges and perspectives of corporate social responsibility the authors examine the current state and future directions of the development of German multinationals. The aim of the article is to define the typical features of the model of corporate social responsibility in Germany and proposes its application for Ukrainian companies. The theoretical section includes economic analysis of the methods and tools of German multinationals. The authors prove that the analysis of the basic features of German corporate social responsibility model can be applied for emerging economies in order to ensure competitiveness, high level of productivity and profitability. The institutions of corporate social responsibility can be used to address critical economic, social and environmental issues, and to act in favor of the development of the national economy. The authors emphasize the necessity of qualitative changes in the institutional environment that will promote entrepreneurial activities and economic growth.
Downloads
References
Achieving Sustainable Development Through Corporate Social Responsibility. (2013).Centre for Economic and Social Development. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. Retrieved from :http:// http://www.iz.or.at/images/doku/csr_research_paper_cesd_kas.pdf
Blindheim , B.T. (2015). Institutional Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Proposed Refinement of the Explicit-Implicit Framework. Business & Society, Vol. 54(1), 52–88.
Bloomfield, S. Theory and Practice of Corporate Governance. An Integrated Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2013. – 421 p.
BMWi (2012). German Mittelstand 2012. Bundesministerium fuer Wirtschaft und Technologie, u.a. umfassende Foerdemitteldatenbank. Retrieved from: http://bmwi.de
Brammer & Millington (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.29, (No.12).
Bustamante Silke (2011). Localization vs. Standardization: Global approaches to CSR Management in multinational companies Paper. Working Papers of the Institute of Management Berlin at the Berlin School of Economics and Law (HWR Berlin), No. 60, Date: 03/2011.
Claessens, S., Yurtoglu, B. (2012). Corporate Governance and Development – An Update. Global Corporate Governance Forum Focus 10, International Finance Corporation.
CSR Practices in Ukraine 2015. (2015). Eds. M. A. Saprykina; Centre for CSR Development. Kyiv, 2015. Retrieved from: http://csr-ukraine.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/ /12/cases_praktice2015.pdf
Griffin, J. J., Prakash, A., (2014). Corporate Responsibility: Initiatives and Mechanisms. Business Society, Vol. 53(4), 465–482.
Heal, G. & Garret, P. (2014): Corporate Social Responsibility – An Economic and Financial Framework. Palgrave Macmillan. December. Retrieved from: www.palgrave-journals.com
Kennedy J.F. (1961): Ask not what your country can do. John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961. Retrieved from: http://www.ushistory.org/documents/ask-not.htm
Monks Robert, Minow Nell, (2011): Corporate Governance. Centre for Financial and Management Studies, SOAS, University of London.
Nosova, O., Bartels, K. (2006).Statistical analysis of the corporate governance system in the Ukraine: problems and development perspectives. Statistische Diskussionsbeiträge ; Nr. 25/. Universität Potsdam. Retrieved from: https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1125
Nosova O., Makovoz O. (2014). Nosova O., Makovoz O. Social responsibility of authorities, business, citizens monograph: 2 t. / State. Higher Teach National Mining University; According to the general edition of G. G. Pivnyak – D. : NGU, 2014. – T. 1. – S. 536–544. (In Ukr.)
Johnson, Lyman, P.Q. (1988) The Eventual Clash Between Judicial and Legislative Notions of Target Management Conduct, 14 Journal of Corporation Law, 35.
Rodriguez, L., C., Montiel, I., Ozuna,T. (2014): A Conceptualization of How Firms Engage in Corporate Responsibility Based on Country Risk. Business & Society, Vol. 53 (5), 625 – 651.
Soellner, A. (2014). Globalization, greed, and exploitation. How to break the baleful path? Journal Business Economics, No. 84, 1211–1235.
Jackson, G. & Witt, A. M. (2016) Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Comparative Advantage: A test and Reinterpretation. Journal of International Business Studies, September, Volume 47, Issue 7, 778–806.