BITCOIN MINING CARBON FOOTPRINT
Abstract
The theoretical framework of the study covers the formation and development of cryptoeconomics, as well as its impact on the environment. The term cryptoeconomics is used to refer to a new industry, which develops around cryptocurrencies and blockchain. Cryptocurrency mining consumes a lot of electricity. As of September 2019, the estimated annual electricity consumption was 78.93 TWh (with an electricity price of 0.05 USD). This model was used to create the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Index web service. If we assume that electricity for mining is generated at coal-fired power plants only, then knowing the energy consumption of bitcoin miners, we can estimate carbon dioxide emissions at the upper boundary. In this case, carbon dioxide emissions are about 80.43 million tons of CO2, which corresponds to 0.24% of the total emissions in the world. The aim of this work is to simulate carbon dioxide emissions caused by bitcoin mining, taking into account the regional distribution of miners and various sources of electricity that are used for mining. To achieve it, the following tasks were set: 1) the formation of a reasonable list of mining pools; 2) clarification of the geographical distribution of miners; 3) assessment of the distribution of mining capacities by region; 4) evaluation of air pollution by regions. The problem of increasing electricity consumption by the network of bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) miners and the corresponding environmental impact should be discussed with policymakers, industry participants and the general public. According to the proposed method for assessing the geographical distribution of mining using the traffic of mining pools web pages, carbon dioxide emissions is about 44.12 million tons per year (0.13% of global emissions), which is two times lower than the upper boundary estimate.
Downloads
References
Rauchs, M., Blandin, A., Klein, K., Pieters, G., Recanatini, M., Zhang, B. (2018). 2nd Global Cryptoasset Benchmarking Study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Retrieved from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/research/centres/alternative-finance/downloads/2018-12-ccaf-2nd-global-cryptoasset-benchmarking.pdf.
The Houses of Parliament (United Kingdom), Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2011). Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation, 383, 4. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn_383-carbon-footprint-electricity-generation.pdf.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (2019). Electricity from Coal. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/cleanrgy/energy-and-you/affect/coal.html.
Raghuvanshi, S. P., Chandra, A., Raghav, A.K. (2006). Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal Based Power Generation in India. Energy Conversion and Management, 47, 4, 427-441. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890405001214.
Rauchs, M., Blandin, A., Dek, A. (2019). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. Retrieved from https://cbeci.org/.
Coinshares. The Bitcoin Mining Network. (2019). Retrieved from https://coinshares.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/MiningWhitepaperJun2019FinalForeword.pdf.
Foteinis, S. (2018). Bitcoin’s Alarming Carbon Footprint. Nature, 554 (7691), 169. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01625-x.
Krause, M. J., Tolaymat, T. (2018). Quantification of Energy and Carbon Costs for Mining Cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability,1, 711-718. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0152-7.pdf.
McCook, H. (2018). The Cost & Sustainability of Bitcoin. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/37178295/The_Cost_and_ Sustainability_of_Bitcoin_August_2018.
Mora, C., Rollin,s R.L., Taladay, K., Kantar, M.B., Chock, M.K., Shimada, M., Franklin, E.C. (2018). Bitcoin Emissions Alone Could Push Global Warming Above 2°C. Nature Climate Change, 8, 931-933. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0321-8.pdf.
British Petroleum (2018). Statistical Review of World Energy 2018. British Petroleum Report: 67th edition. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf.
Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L., Gallersdörfer, U. (2019). The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin. Joule,3, 7, 1647-1661. Retrieved from https://www.cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2542-4351%2819%2930255-7.
Vires, A. (2019). Renewable Energy Will Not Solve Bitcoin’s Sustainability Problem Joule. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.007.
Vries, A. (2018) Bitcoin's Growing Energy Problem. Joule, 2, 5, 801-805.
International Energy Agency (2017). World Energy Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2017.