SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE

Keywords: public policies, public governance, social complexity, complex adaptive systems, self-organization

Abstract

Steering social processes becomes more and more problematic, which implies the necessity to seek new, more sophisticated methods of public policy and forms of social coordination. The condition for their development and then their effective implementation is to learn nature and logic of action of complex social systems, the objective that can largely be met by using system approach.

The paper concerns possibilities to use virtues of thinking in system categories for conceptualization and projection of actions in public sphere. Reflection on the social complexity phenomenon and determinants of system approach application as a method to reduce such complexity, in order to capture the logics of social systems, represents a starting point. Key research issue is represented by deliberations on public governance expressed as steering complex social systems. A lot of effort has been devoted to self-organization phenomenon while making use of the scientific outputs of cybernetics and macrosociology. The conclusion is that in the conditions of complexity and high dynamics of processes, the efficacy of public governance depends on the abilities to use endogenic potentials of social systems.

Redefinition of government role in public authority area should be aimed at, through giving up top-down and narrowly defined interventions for exercising general supervision and active leadership. Thus soft forms of coordination should be opted for, such as soft law, with the possibility of further, ex post, specification of public policy goals, modelled after standards of contractual relationships. Public actions should have inclusive character, and the goals defined should be an outcome of public debate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashby, W. R. (2004). Principles of the self-organizing system. Classical Papers - Principles of the self-organizing system, Vol. 6, No. 1-2, pp. 102-126.

Batten, D. (2000). Discovering Artificial Economics. How Agents Learn and Economics Evolve. Oxford: Westviev Press.

Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller Inc.

Chapman, J. (2002). System Failure. Why governments must learn to think differently. London: DEMOS.

Checkland, P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 17, p.11-58.

Esmark, A. (2011). Systems Theory, in: Brevir M. The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hausner, J. (2012). The development and types of social knowledge, Public Governance (Zarzadzanie Publiczne), nr 1 (19).

Jessop, B. (2011). Metagovernance, in: Brevir M. The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kickert, J.M., Erik-Hans, Klijn & Joop, F.M. Koppenjan (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, London: SAGE Publications.

Kauffman, S. A. (2008). Reinventing the Sacred. A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. New York: Basic Books.

Klijn, E. H. (2008). Complexity Theory and Public Administration: what’s new?, Public Management Review, Vol. 10, No 3, pp. 299-317.

Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance, SAGE, London.

Kooiman, J. (2008). Interactive Governance and Governability: An Introduction, The Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-11.

Luhmann, N. (1996). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Published
2019-06-06
How to Cite
Bialynicki-Birula, P. (2019). SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Economic Series, (96), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-2379-2019-96-01