Main directions of search for effective methods of state regulation of economic relations of business structures

Keywords: state regulation, economic relations, entrepreneurship, business structures, mechanisms of Public Administration, methods of state regulation

Abstract

The article examines the main directions of searching for effective methods of state regulation of economic relations of business structures. The objective nature of the growing attention of the state to the level, quality and efficiency of economic relations arising between various economic entities is proved. This is due to many different factors and phenomena, which implies the search for an adequate regulatory mechanism that operates on the basis of ensuring a compromise between market (corresponding to the ideas of entrepreneurship) and administrative tools, methods and models. At the same time, it is concluded that the existence of an effective system of state regulation of economic relations is one of the most important components and conditions for the development of the business environment and the entire national economy.

Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign experience, one of the most effective tools in this area can be considered the use of the so-called "risk-based approach in the implementation of state control (supervision)". Significant experience of such work has been accumulated in many economically developed countries, especially in those that hold leading positions in international ratings of the development of the business environment and entrepreneurial activity.

At the national level, it is necessary to create a developed socio-economic system that will serve as the basis for the formation of an effective business environment and the establishment of economic relations that satisfy the interests of a significant part of economic entities.

When building a management mechanism and regulatory mechanism, it is necessary to rely on existing forecasts of socio-economic development and, on the basis of this, model results designed for the long term.

The creation and functioning of a clear and transparent system of economic relations provides for the formation of an effective management mechanism based on a combination of state and market regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natalia Stativka , Харківський регіональний інститут державного управління Національної академії державного управління при Президентові України, м. Харків

Doctor of Public Administration, Professor, Head of Department of Labor Economics and Personnel Management, KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

Maksym Bubliy , KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Labor Economics and Personnel Management, KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

Alla Nadtochii , KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

PhD of Public Administration, Associate Professor of Personnel Management and Labor Economic Department, KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

References

Bezuhla, L.S. (2011). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti v Ukraini [Mechanisms of state regulation of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, vol. 6, 89–92 [in Ukrainian].

Bila, I.S., Salatiuk, N.M. (2014). Svitovyi dosvid derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia pidpryiemnytstva [World experience of state regulation of entrepreneurship]. Svitova ekonomika ta mizhnarodni vidnosyny. – World economy and in ternational relations, vol. 1. 26–30 [in Ukrainian].

Varnalii, Z.S., Kuznietsova, I. S. (2012). Derzhavna rehuliatorna polityka v sferi maloho pidpryiemnytstva [State regulatory policy in the sphere of small business]. Kyiv: In-t ekon. prohnozuvannia [in Ukrainian].

Zharaia, S.B. (2011), Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti na rehionalnomu rivni: shliakhy rozvytku v Ukraini ta yevropeiska praktyka [Mechanisms of state regulation of entrepreneurial activity at the regional level: ways of development in Ukraine and European practice], Kyiv: NAPA [in Ukrainian].

Zianko, V.V. (2008)/ Innovatsiine pidpryiemnytstvo: sutnist, mekhanizmy i formy rozvytku [Innovative entrepreneurship: essence, mechanisms and forms of development]. Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM Vinnytsia [in Ukrainian].

Olianych, V.V. (2012). Pryvatne ta kooperatyvne pidpryiemnytstvo selianskykh hospodarstv v Ukraini: istorychnyi aspekt [Private and cooperative entrepreneurship of peasant farms in Ukraine: historical aspect]. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.N. Karazina [in Ukrainian].

Pyrih, O.A. (2011). Pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: vid vytokiv do sohodennia [Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: from the origins to the present]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Prokopets, L.V. (2018). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti. [Mechanisms of state regulation of entrepreneurial activity]. Biznes-navihator – Business Navigator, vol. 1-1, 162–166 [in Ukrainian].

Saher, L.Iu. (2017). Upravlinnia vnutrishnimy komunikatsiiamy pidpryiemstv: teoriia, metodyka, praktyka [Management of internal communications of enterprises: theory, methodology, practice]. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury [in Ukrainian].

Published
2021-06-03
Section
Theory and Philosophy of Public Administration