Рекомендації до впровадження технологій розподіленого реєстру (блокчейн) у публічний сектор України на основі світового досвіду
Анотація
Інтеграція нових технологій, таких як технологія розподіленого реєстру, в державні системи є багатогранним процесом, що характеризується безліччю потенційних переваг, пов’язаних з ними витрат і ризиків. Попередні та існуючі пілотні впровадження програмних рішень на базі технології розподіленого реєстру у державному секторі продемонстрували, що ця технологія може мати різний вплив залежно від контекстуальних факторів, включаючи і конкретний тип обраної державної послуги. Крім того, у кожній окремій сфері публічних послуг впровадження технологій електронного врядування може мати різні результати для різних зацікавлених сторін, зокрема, державних органів, державних службовців та громадян.
Тому, в рамках цієї статті був проведений огляд та аналіз світового досвіду використання технології розподіленого реєстру в різних сферах державного сектору. Для цього було визначено декілька країн, що мають передовий досвід в області електронного врядування та імплементації рішень на базі технології розподіленого реєстру. Опираючись на досвід цих країн, а також на особливості, переваги, рівень зрілості технології блокчейн та наявних рішень на її основі були сформовані загальні рекомендації, щодо впровадження технологій розподіленого реєстру (блокчейн) у публічний сектор України.
Завантаження
Посилання
Allessie, D., Sobolewski, M., Vaccari, L. Blockchain for digital Government.
An assessment of pioneering implementations in public services. 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332901048_Blockchain_for_digital_government_An_assessment_of_pioneering_implementations_in_public_services
Amstad, M., Huang, B., Morgan, P.J., & Shirai, S. (2019). Fintech, cryptoassets, and Central Bank Digital Currency in the Republic of Korea, is. 1018. URL: www.adbi.org
Andrews, Seoul. (2019). The Blockchain city. Cities Today. URL: https://cities-today.com/seoul-the-blockchain-city/
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C.G., Giannakidou, I., Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare. gov website. Gov Inf Quart. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0740624X15000799?via%3Dihub
Australian Government. (2023). Australia’s National Blockchain Roadmap. URL: https://www.services-exports.gov.au/progress/australias-national-blockchain-roadmap
Australian Government. (2023). The Data and Digital Government Strategy. URL: https://www.dataanddigital.gov.au/
Bank of England, HM Treasury. The digital pound:a new form of money for households and businesses? Consultation Paper. 2023. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/paper/2023/the-digital-pound-consultation-working-paper.pdf?la=en&hash=5CC053D3820DCE2F40656E772D9105FA10C654EC
Bank of England. (2021). Bank of England publishes policy for omnibus accounts in RTGS. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2021/april/boe-publishes-policy-for-omnibus-accounts-in-rtgs
Bank of England. (2021). Bank of England statement on Central Bank Digital Currency. URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2021/april/bank-of-england-statement-on-central-bank-digital-currency
Basiuk, O. (2022). Digital technologies in optimization of the budget process: best international experience and conclusions for Ukraine. Pressing problems of public administration, no. 1 (60), 117–132.
Basyuk, O. (2022). Analysis of the budgetary policy of Ukraine taking into account the experience of using digital technologies. Bulletin of Postgraduate Education, is. 19(48). Series «Social and Behavioural Sciences». URL: http://umo.edu.ua/images/content/nashi_vydanya/visnyk_PO/19_48_2022/social/Bulletin_19_48_Social_and_behavioral_sciences_Basiuk.pdf
Burger, C., Kuhlmann, A., Richard, P.R., Weinmann, J. (2016). Blockchain in the energy transition. A survey among decision-makers in the German energy industry. German Energy Agency, May 2020, 41. URL: www.esmt.org
Cagigas, D., Clifton, J., Diaz-Fuentes, D., Fernández-Gutiérrez, M. & Harpes, C. (2023). Blockchain in government: toward an evaluation framework. Policy Design and Practice. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2023.2230702
Cha, S. (2021). South Korea to issue blockchain-protected Digital ‘vaccine passports’. Reuters. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-idUSKBN2BO43W
Choi, Y. (2021). Blockchain, artificial intelligence and big data: how Korea Customs Service leverages technology to supervise e-commerce. URL: https://mag.wcoomd.org/magazine/wco-news-96/blockchain-artificial-intelligence-and-big-data-korea/
Commonwealth Bank. (2018). Making Money Smart. URL: https://www.commbank.com.au/content/dam/commbank-assets/business/industries/2018-11/making_money_smart_report.pdf
Cooper, H., Hill, T., Kangalingam, S. (2022). PwC Australia. Around the world in government blockchain. URL: https://www.pwc.com.au/digitalpulse/government-blockchain-use-cases.html
CSIRO & CBA. (2018). Making Money Smart. URL: https://data61.csiro.au/en/Our-Research/Our-Work/SmartMoney
Digital Transformation Agency. Blockchain case study: Australian Taxation Office. Digital Transformation Agency. URL: https://www.dta.gov.au/help-and-advice/technology/blockchain/do-you-need-blockchain/blockchain-case-studies/blockchain-case-study-australian-taxation-office
Digital Transformation Agency. Digital Transformation Strategy 2018-2025. URL: https://www.dta.gov.au/digital-transformation-strategy/digital-transformation-strategy-2018-2025
Dunayev, I., Byelova, L., Kud, A., Rodchenko, V. (2023). Implementing the “Government as a platform” concept: the assessment method and an optimal humancentered structure to address technological challenges. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 2/13 (122). URL: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/275613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.
275613
Dunayev, I., Petrovska, I., Safronova, O. (2022). Development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of smart cities under the conditions of digitalization of city governance. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 3/13 (117). URL : http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/265017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.260304
Dziundziuk, V., Dziundziuk, B. (2022). Public administration using blockchain technology and platforms: new opportunities. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, no. 2 (61), 104–115. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/apdu/article/view/21848/20248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-2-07
E-Democracy & open data. E-Governance Estonia. URL: https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-governance/e-democracy/.
Eesti Pank. (2020). Eesti Pank ran an experiment to investigate the technological possibilities of a central bank digital currency based on blockchain. URL: https://www.eestipank.ee/en/press/eesti-pank-ran-experiment-investigate-technological-possibilities-central-bank-digital-currency-13122021
Electronic Trade Documents Act. (2023). URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/38/enacted/data.pdf
Estonian Tech & IT solutions. This is the story of the world’s most advanced digital society. URL: https://digiexpo.e-estonia.com/story-of-e-estonia/
Guardtime. KSI Blockchain Timestamping. Guardtime. URL: https://guardtime.com/timestamping
Hall, I. (2023). Digital pound ‘likely to be needed in future’: UK CBDC consultation launches. URL: https://www.globalgovernmentfintech.com/digital-pound-likely-to-be-needed-in-future-uk-cbdc-consultation-launches/
Healthcare – e-Estonia. URL: https://e-estonia.com/solutions/healthcare/
HM Treasury. (2022). Government sets out plan to make UK a global cryptoasset technology hub. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-sets-out-plan-to-make-uk-a-global-cryptoasset-technology-hub
Kattel, R., Mergel, I. (2019). Estonia’s Digital Transformation. Great Policy Successes. 143–160. URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/42635/chapter/358101931
Kitsing, M. (2008). Success Without Strategy: E-Government Development in Estonia. Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Partnerships for Public Innovation, DG.O 2008, Montreal, Canada, May 18–21, no. 3(1). 86–106. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221584877_Explaining_the_e-government_success_in_Estonia
Korol, V., Dmytryk, O., Karpenko, O., Riadinska, V., Basiuk, O. (2022). Elaboration of recommendations on the development of the state internal audit system when applying the digital technologies Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 1 (13 (115)), 39–48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.252424
KSI ® blockchain in Estonia. Frequently Asked Questions. 2020. URL: https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020mar-faq-ksi-blockchain-1-1.pdf
Kud, A. (2021). Decentralized Information Platforms in Public Governance: Reconstruction of the Modern Democracy or Comfort Blinding?, International Journal of Public Administration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1993905
Kud, A. (2022). Methodological approach to creating the mechanism for modernizing the public governance system based on decentralized information platforms. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2522-9931-2022-21(50)-160-220
Martinson, P. (2019). Estonia: the digital republic secured by blockchain. Pwc, 2019, 1–12. URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/legal/tech/assets/estonia-the-digital-republic-secured-by-blockchain.pdf
Mcarthy, N. (2018). The Countries That Trust Their Government Most And Least. Fobes. 2018. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/01/22/the-countries-that-trust-their-government-most-and-least-infographic/?sh=507716f2777a
OECD Data. (2021). Australia. OECD: OECD Data. URL: https://data.oecd.org/australia.htm
OECD Data. (2022). Gross domestic spending on R&D. URL: https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm
Pew Research Center. (2023). Public Trust in Government: 1958-2023. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/01/22/the-countries-that-trust-their-government-most-and-least-infographic/?sh=507716f2777a
Politou, E., Casino, F., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2019). Blockchain Mutability: Challenges and Proposed Solutions. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, April 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2019.2949510
Schlatt, V., Guggenberger, T., Schmid, J., Urbach, N. (2023). Attacking the trust machine: developing an information systems research agenda for blockchain cybersecurity. Int J Inf Manage. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268401222000019?via%3Dihub
Shumba, C. (2023). Coindesk. U.K. Move to Digitize Trade Documents Could Rely on Blockchain, Government Says. URL: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/07/27/uk-move-to-digitize-trade-documents-could-rely-on-blockchain-government-says/
Sullivan, C., Burger, E. (2017). E-residency and blockchain. Computer law and security review, no. 33 (4), 470–481. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0267364917300845?via%3Dihub
The Law Commission. (2021). Smart contracts. URL: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts/#:~:text=We%20published%20our%20advice%20to,use%20of%20smart%20legal%20contracts
The Law Commission. (2021). Smart legal contracts. Advice to Government. URL: https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2021/11/Smart-legal-contracts-accessible.pdf
The Legal 500. United Kingdom: Blockchain. (2022). URL: https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/united-kingdom-blockchain/
The Reserve Bank of Australia, The Digital Finance CRC. Australian CBDC Pilot for Digital Finance Innovation. (2023). URL: https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/central-bank-digital-currency/pdf/australian-cbdc-pilot-for-digital-finance-innovation-project-report.pdf
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Data-Center
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. Estonia. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/57-Estonia
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. Republic of Korea. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/138-Republic-of-Korea
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. Australia. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/9-Australia
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. E-Government Development Index. Country data. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. (2022). URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/182-United-Kingdom-of-Great-Britain-and-Northern-Ireland
Wong, P., Chia, F., Kiu, M., Lou, E. (2020). Potential integration of blockchain technology into smart sustainable city (SSC) developments: a systematic review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2020-0140
Young, J. (2019). Here’s how the gov’t of Seoul is using a public blockchain in the real-world. CCN.com. URL: https://www.ccn.com/heres-how-the-govt-of-seoul-is-using-a-public-blockchain-in-the-real-world/
Young-sil, Y. (2018). Korean gov’t Unveils blockchain technology development strategy. Businesskorea. URL: http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=23184
Zelenovic, A. (2020). Publicis Sapient. Blockchain: Now a Reality and Rising Rapidly in the Public Sector. URL: https://www.publicissapient.com/insights/blockchain-now-a-reality
Zhao, W. (2018). Korean government to LEAD 6 Blockchain pilots with $9 million fund. CoinDesk. URL: https://www.coindesk.com/korean-government-lead-6-blockchain-pilots-9-million-fund
